On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:00:57 -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
Hard to get unless you have several kilobucks to spend on an online
type UPS, though. I actually had one I got surplus, several years
back, but the constant inverter buzz got old fast in a home
environment.
Refurbups.com -- go look at
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I don't consider the ability to stay up for a few minutes when there's a
> brief blackout to be the most important function of a good UPS, even
> though that's kinda the reason the things were invented in the first
> place. The most important
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:47:55PM +, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > No power conditioning (implied by no UPS) is nothing to brag about.
>
> If your utility power is very -- common now in places with buried
> utilities -- a UPS of the non-enter
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> No power conditioning (implied by no UPS) is nothing to brag about.
>
> If your utility power is very -- common now in places with buried
> utilities -- a UPS of the non-enterprise var
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> No power conditioning (implied by no UPS) is nothing to brag about.
If your utility power is very -- common now in places with buried
utilities -- a UPS of the non-enterprise variety can actually make
reliability *worse*. I've found that stan
On Friday 15 June 2012 09:49:49 Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 14 22:56:16 2012
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:51:45 -0500
> > From: Mark Felder
> > Cc: Steve Bertrand
> > Subje
On 06/15/2012 08:30, Bernt Hansson wrote:
>
> Aha.A pissing contest and it's fridaycount me in...
>
> FreeBSD fqdn 4.11-RELEASE-p20 FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p20 #0: Mon Aug 28
> 07:21:42 CEST 2006 user@fqdn:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HPNETSERVERFW i386
> _
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 07:49:49AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> Heh. check out -this- one:
>
> % uname -a
> ** *** ** *** Kernel #0: Thu Mar 20
> 16:40:01 CST 1997 :/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL
> i386
>
> The build date _is_ acc
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:20:19PM -0600, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I still have non-root access to a box from my old job... it is
> non-available and doing nothing, so updates are irrelevant:
>
> %uptime
> 9:01PM up 1142 days, 5:29, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Hmm. My longest uptim
On 06/15/2012 05:51 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
FreeBSD REDACTED 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Nov 15 16:29:10
CST 2006 root@REDACTED:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/IPFW-POLING-ALTQ i386
Theres no way I'm giving out the organization name or hostname haha. We're
slowly moving customers away fro
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 14 22:56:16 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:51:45 -0500
> From: Mark Felder
> Cc: Steve Bertrand
> Subject: Re: Uptime [OT]
>
> FreeBSD REDACTED 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
On 14/06/2012 9:43 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:37:59 -0500, Steve Bertrand
wrote:
That's hardcore homie... wow!
What does this box survive to do?
Transparent traffic shaping/firewalling via IPFW; it's not actually
visible to the internet. There isn't much load at all, but
FreeBSD REDACTED 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Nov 15 16:29:10
CST 2006 root@REDACTED:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/IPFW-POLING-ALTQ i386
Theres no way I'm giving out the organization name or hostname haha. We're
slowly moving customers away from this device, but not forcing anyone.
I
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:37:59 -0500, Steve Bertrand
wrote:
That's hardcore homie... wow!
What does this box survive to do?
Transparent traffic shaping/firewalling via IPFW; it's not actually
visible to the internet. There isn't much load at all, but the hardware is
quickly aging. The d
On 14/06/2012 9:35 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
In production and survived many area-wide power outages:
% uptime
10:34PM up 2021 days, 18:02, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
That's hardcore homie... wow!
What does this box survive to do?
Steve
On 14/06/2012 9:20 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I still have non-root access to a box from my old job... it is
non-available and doing nothing, so updates are irrelevant:
%uptime
9:01PM up 1142 days, 5:29, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
fwiw:
%uname -a
FreeBSD ..xxx 7.2-PRERELEA
In production and survived many area-wide power outages:
% uptime
10:34PM up 2021 days, 18:02, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:09:31 Polytropon wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm going to setup a system with a dial-up modem for sporadic
> Internet access; a provider that charges per second online time
> is used. Is there a way ppp (which is used for dialing) can log
> the online time (or at least the connec
Many thanks for your ideas. I think I'll use #2 and have start
and stop time recorded in epoch format (because its easy to
get the substraction result instead of fiddling around with
date's ymdhms parameters).
This is because I'm not very familiar with ppp's logs, and
maybe they provide the needed
I'm going to setup a system with a dial-up modem for sporadic
Internet access; a provider that charges per second online time
is used. Is there a way ppp (which is used for dialing) can log
the online time (or at least the connection's start and stop time)
so the costs can be calculated?
option
> I love the direction this thread has taken. First, humorous,
then it
> will turn into flames. I bet all my US$:-)
>
Unfortunately that doesn't really offer much value anymore with
the
recent market downturn- got anything else to
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 10:03 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Thursday, October 09, 2008 09:34:02 -0500 Jerry
McAllister
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:07:31AM -0700, Chad Marshall
wrote:
>
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 07:50 -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
> Here's what I said to the last guy who says my skin is thin,
just
> leave well enough alone and drop it please. Seems your skin is
thin as
> well if you can't handle a little back talk :)
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 10:52 -0400, Mikel King wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Chad Marshall wrote:
>
> > No Problem, I figured that there are other systems out there
with a
> > longer uptime. I have this server as a
postfix/courier-im
8 9:56 AM
> To: User Questions
> Cc: Chad Marshall; Jon Radel
> Subject: Re: uptime 2 years!
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Zbigniew Szalbot
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/10/9 Jon Radel:
> >>
> >> Dear Mr. Marshall:
> >>
Zbigniew Szalbot:
2008/10/9 Jon Radel:
Dear Mr. Marshall:
I'm terribly sorry that our representatives in charge of answering emails
have been rude to you. I've just fired the lot of them, particularly as we
can't afford to keep then on anymore seeing as how your generous donations
are now in j
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:00:38PM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
>
> No Problem, I figured that there are other systems out there with a
> longer uptime. I have this server as a postfix/courier-imap/
> squirrelmail (60+ accounts and 30-40 forwards) mailserver with apache/
> php/mysql. Also use
--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: uptime 2 years!
> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
> Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 8:41 PM
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> [snip]
> > And in th
--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: uptime 2 years!
> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
> Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 8:41 PM
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> [snip]
> > And in th
>> uptime 2 years!
Congratulations. Long uptimes should be shared, so as to encourage people to
consider FreeBSD for long-term stability. Thank you for posting.
Through this discussion the lazy administrator topic came up... In
regards to that, we
must keep in mind, 'stability,' pertains not only
Thank you. Although I have always felt there are better systems for
Administrative purposes, FreeBSD is a rock solid performer. I'm a Mac
user/Fan as well and since a lot of it's core was built on FreeBSD, goes
to show how great it is. Thanks to all of you who were at least
constructive and su
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
[snip]
And in theory it should be possible to change time_t to unsigned, and
get another two-thirds of a century out of it...
However this would break binary compatibility with anything compiled
before the change.
--
GNU Key fingerptrint: 2E13 BC16 5F54 0FBD 62ED 42B6 B6
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:11:13PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
But the discussion that followed made me realize that uptime is not
everything. I also love to see huge uptimes on my servers but if
anything this discussion brought it home to me that more than anything
I need to take care of sec
Chad Marshall wrote:
Here's what I said to the last guy who says my skin is thin, just
leave well enough alone and drop it please. Seems your skin is thin as
well if you can't handle a little back talk :)
Well, I can always except critism. The problem is that I don't need
rude responses for s
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/10/9 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I love the direction this thread has taken. First, humorous, then it
> > will turn into flames. I bet all my US$:-)
>
> Well, I do not have much to lose in
Hi,
2008/10/9 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I love the direction this thread has taken. First, humorous, then it
> will turn into flames. I bet all my US$:-)
Well, I do not have much to lose in terms of USD ;) but I cannot
really understand why some people are still sort of getting
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/9 Jon Radel:
>>
>> Dear Mr. Marshall:
>>
>> I'm terribly sorry that our representatives in charge of answering emails
>> have been rude to you. I've just fired the lot of them, particularly as we
>> can't afford
2008/10/9 Jon Radel:
>
> Dear Mr. Marshall:
>
> I'm terribly sorry that our representatives in charge of answering emails
> have been rude to you. I've just fired the lot of them, particularly as we
> can't afford to keep then on anymore seeing as how your generous donations
> are now in jeopardy.
Chad Marshall wrote:
Here's what I said to the last guy who says my skin is thin, just leave
well enough alone and drop it please. Seems your skin is thin as well if
you can't handle a little back talk :)
Well, I can always except critism. The problem is that I don't need rude
responses fo
--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Chad Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you should put someone in charge of answering emails
> who aren't
> cocky and smug
This is a public mailing list. No one is in charge of answering mails to it.
When sending to -questions, you are emailing the community of p
Hi,
2008/10/9 Chad Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, I can always except critism. The problem is that I don't need rude
> responses for something I thought would be something to share for your
> organization, a success story of FreeBSD. Only for people to call me lazy
> and say "Big Deal". If
--On Thursday, October 09, 2008 09:34:02 -0500 Jerry McAllister
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:07:31AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
Sorry to bother you...You know, you could just leave well enough
alone if you don't care. There goes any future donations from me and
my
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Chad Marshall wrote:
No Problem, I figured that there are other systems out there with a
longer uptime. I have this server as a postfix/courier-imap/
squirrelmail (60+ accounts and 30-40 forwards) mailserver with
apache/php/mysql. Also use it as a slave authori
Here's what I said to the last guy who says my skin is thin, just
leave well enough alone and drop it please. Seems your skin is thin as
well if you can't handle a little back talk :)
Well, I can always except critism. The problem is that I don't need
rude responses for something I thought
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:07:31AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
>
> Sorry to bother you...You know, you could just leave well enough
> alone if you don't care. There goes any future donations from me and
> my organization as this is more than the first untactful email I
> recieved from this
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:07:31AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
>
> Sorry to bother you...You know, you could just leave well enough
> alone if you don't care. There goes any future donations from me and
> my organization as this is more than the first untactful email I
> recieved from this,
On Behalf Of matt donovan
> why is this news or even important? heck most servers
> are up longer then this.
It's neither. But the discussion proved useful as it served to remind me
that there are security updates that need to be reviewed periodically,
even for machines that are not directly conn
Sorry to bother you...You know, you could just leave well enough
alone if you don't care. There goes any future donations from me and
my organization as this is more than the first untactful email I
recieved from this, I'll donate and use other platforms. Please don't
send any other emai
Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> andrew clarke wrote:
>>
>> Is FreeBSD 7.1 2038-proof? ;-)
>>
>
> As far as I know the amd64 version is (anyone care to verify/correct?)
All 64-bit platforms have 64-bit time_t, so that covers most of the
possible problems. Even on 32-bit platforms, the
Well sometimes you don't need to upgrade and you aren't connected to
the
internet directly.
elephant: {25} uptime
5:54PM up 1756 days, 7:07, 2 users, load averages: 1.04, 1.01, 1.00
elephant 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT
2003
This machin
Well sometimes you don't need to upgrade and you aren't connected to the
internet directly.
elephant: {25} uptime
5:54PM up 1756 days, 7:07, 2 users, load averages: 1.04, 1.01, 1.00
elephant 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003
This machine is semi-retired now but
why is this news or even important? heck most servers are up longer then
this.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
No Problem, I figured that there are other systems out there with a
longer uptime. I have this server as a postfix/courier-imap/
squirrelmail (60+ accounts and 30-40 forwards) mailserver with apache/
php/mysql. Also use it as a slave authoritative nameserver for over
100 zones (one zone wit
Nice, but what does port audit say?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Chad Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the past
> but one of my servers running FreeBSD will have an uptime of 2 years
> tomorrow. I plan on putting
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 22:47 +, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Frank Shute wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:54:47AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
> >> past but one of my servers r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Duane Hill wrote:
| On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Frank Shute wrote:
|
|> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:54:47AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
|>>
|>>
|>> Hello,
|>>
|>> Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
|>> past but one of my ser
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Frank Shute wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:54:47AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
Hello,
Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
past but one of my servers running FreeBSD will have an uptime of 2
years tomorrow. I plan on putting on my blog b
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:54:47AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
> past but one of my servers running FreeBSD will have an uptime of 2
> years tomorrow. I plan on putting on my blog but as it doesn't have
>
andrew clarke wrote:
>
> Is FreeBSD 7.1 2038-proof? ;-)
>
As far as I know the amd64 version is (anyone care to verify/correct?)
--
GNU Key fingerptrint: 2E13 BC16 5F54 0FBD 62ED 42B6 B65F 24AB E9C2 CCD1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
--On Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:54:47 -0500 Chad Marshall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
past but one of my servers running FreeBSD will have an uptime of 2
years tomorrow. I plan on putting on my blog but as it does
On Wed 2008-10-08 09:21:53 UTC-0700, Jeremy Chadwick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't want to rain on your parade, but uptime ultimately means squat.
Agreed.
> I can install FreeBSD on a box under my desk at home, on a UPS, and
> leave it powered on for the next 30 years -- it tells people a
On Wednesday 08 October 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:54:47AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
> > Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
> > past but one of my servers running FreeBSD will have an uptime of 2
> > years tomorrow. I plan on puttin
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:54:47AM -0700, Chad Marshall wrote:
> Would like to share a success story which I'm sure you've had in the
> past but one of my servers running FreeBSD will have an uptime of 2
> years tomorrow. I plan on putting on my blog but as it doesn't have much
> reach but wan
Stan Cooper wrote:
It was that obvious, huh? <:-)
Yup ;-)
The think I didn't see anyone mention was how you could have found this
for yourself.
apropos uptime
gives you a list of manual pages which mention the word you give. Just
like google, sometimes you need to be creative about t
It was that obvious, huh? <:-)
Thanks,
Stan
Don O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Type uptime at the prompt.
Hi;
How do I determine the uptime of my server?
Thanks,
Stan2
Top will also show it
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
It was that obvious, huh? <:-)
Thanks,
Stan
Don O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Type uptime at the prompt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Cooper
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:45 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Up
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:59:20 +0600
Bachilo Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В сообщении от Пятница 23 марта 2007 12:45 Stan Cooper написал(a):
> > Hi;
> > How do I determine the uptime of my server?
> > Thanks,
> > Stan2
> >
>
> give the 'uptime' comand in console.
>
On Friday 23 March 2007 01:45:16 am Stan Cooper wrote:
> Hi;
> How do I determine the uptime of my server?
> Thanks,
> Stan2
Oddly enough, by typing 'uptime' at the command prompt.
David
--
An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.
___
freebs
Type uptime at the prompt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Cooper
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:45 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Uptime
Hi;
How do I determine the uptime of my server?
Thanks,
Stan2
You measure the time between kicking it, and someone catching it, I think.
No..thats hangtime.
Try: uptime
On 3/23/07, Stan Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi;
How do I determine the uptime of my server?
Thanks,
Stan2
-
TV dinner still cooling?
Check ou
В сообщении от Пятница 23 марта 2007 12:45 Stan Cooper написал(a):
> Hi;
> How do I determine the uptime of my server?
> Thanks,
> Stan2
>
give the 'uptime' comand in console.
С уважением, Бачило Дмитрий
Руководитель отдела системной интеграции
ООО "Компания Солинк"
--
Wi
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these
> sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels, or is
> there some black magic going on that I don't know about?
OF COURSE there's black magic involved. It involves daemons, chickens
and a few ot
On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Tom Vilot wrote:
Mark wrote:
So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what
I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things
now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these
sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels,...
Yep
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:31:19PM -0800, Mark wrote:
> I realise this may be the wrong list to post to, but it *is*
> a question and it *is* about FreeBSD... :)
>
> http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html
>
> So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what
> I'd like to kno
Mark wrote:
So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what
I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things
now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these
sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels,...
Yep!! (AFAIK)
___
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:42:01AM +0800, Spades wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My box has been up for 50+ days, however uptime only
> shows always less than 2:00 hrs.
>
> Any idea?
>
> 5:59PM up 1:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>
> Thanks.
Perhaps your box rebooted and you didn't know it? L
Hi,
My box has been up for 50+ days, however uptime only
shows always less than 2:00 hrs.
Any idea?
5:59PM up 1:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Hi,
My box has been up for 50+ days, however uptime only
shows always less than 2:00 hrs.
Any idea?
5:59PM up 1:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
78 matches
Mail list logo
