Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Tino Engel
Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Engel wrote: Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Tino Engel wrote: > freebsdangel# setenv PATH "${PATH}:/usr/compat/linux/lib" you are looking for LD_LIBRARY_PATH You should do this with ldconfig so its there all the time; but use the linux compat one, not the freebsd base system one. The port should have done this for you. cat /compat/linux/e

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Engel wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >>> I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right >>> now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, >>

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Tino Engel
Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, which does not work on many sites. To get Flash 9, you need to use wine under freebs

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right > now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, > which does not work on many sites. To get Flash 9, you need to use > wine under freebsd and install the win

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Mark Moellering
On Friday 09 November 2007 4:20 pm, John wrote: > I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good > progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do > flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the > linuxpluginwrapper approach, an

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-11 Thread icantthinkofone
Tino Engel wrote: icantthinkofone wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Chuck Robey
Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:53:40AM +, Tino Engel wrote: > icantthinkofone wrote: >> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >>> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >>> John wrote: > I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making > good > progress, but then I ran into t

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
icantthinkofone wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I trie

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > John wrote: > >> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good > >> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do > >> flash. Definite showstopper, for m

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread icantthinkofone
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxplugin

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread icantthinkofone
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxplugin

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > John wrote: >> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good >> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do >> flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the >> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
John wrote: > I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good > progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do > flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the > linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. > > It made me re