Chuck Robey wrote:
> per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > Chuck Robey wrote:
> >> But I do need to figure out how to get the subversion archive (not
> >> a particular branch of the archive, the whole kit and kaboodle).
> >
> > devel/svk? (From a mention last December; I have not tried it.)
>
> Huh.
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:18:33 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>>> What I don't know is, I use cvsup all the time, but when I switch to
>>> svn, what does the "cvsup" job of tracking an archive (not tracking
>>> the sour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> But I do need to figure out how to get the subversion archive (not
>> a particular branch of the archive, the whole kit and kaboodle).
>
> devel/svk? (From a mention last December; I have not trie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:18:33 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> What I don't know is, I use cvsup all the time, but when I switch to
>> svn, what does the "cvsup" job of tracking an archive (not tracking
>> the sources, I mean the
Chuck Robey wrote:
> But I do need to figure out how to get the subversion archive (not
> a particular branch of the archive, the whole kit and kaboodle).
devel/svk? (From a mention last December; I have not tried it.)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:05:53 -0300 (ADT), Andrew Hamilton-Wright
wrote:
> o ***Early Adopter Warning***: There has not been (as far as I know)
>a general call for people to move to this type of repository access
>except for committers -- therefore expect rough edges until a
>general a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:18:33 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> What I don't know is, I use cvsup all the time, but when I switch to
> svn, what does the "cvsup" job of tracking an archive (not tracking
> the sources, I mean the archive)? Does svn do it all itself? If so,
> I can find out how, I just w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Hamilton-Wright wrote:
>
> Sorry to follow-up my own note, but . . .
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Andrew Wright wrote:
>
> [ further snippage of previous note ]
>
>> Strong Caveats:
>
>> o ***Early Adopter Warning***: There has not been (as far
Sorry to follow-up my own note, but . . .
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Andrew Wright wrote:
[ further snippage of previous note ]
Strong Caveats:
o ***Early Adopter Warning***: There has not been (as far as I know) a
general call for people to move to this type of repository access except
for c
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 07:05:53AM -0300, Andrew Hamilton-Wright wrote:
>
> [ snippage of question re: svn and cvs ]
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> > Andrew Wright wrote:
> >>
> >> The primary advantage of using svn is that the _server_ uses a
> >> different protocol to track ob
[ snippage of question re: svn and cvs ]
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
Andrew Wright wrote:
The primary advantage of using svn is that the _server_ uses a
different protocol to track objects.
I think that's unclear, you can't mean that just having the protocol be
different, that'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Wright wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> I've finally decided that it's way past time that I switched from
>> using cvs for
>> my home archive (currently /home/ncvs) to using subversion. I'm
>> trying to hunt
>> down a w
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
I've finally decided that it's way past time that I switched from using cvs for
my home archive (currently /home/ncvs) to using subversion. I'm trying to hunt
down a web page that might give a set of rules to help moving things. I've
It appears that y
13 matches
Mail list logo
