Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-05 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500 "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable > release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from > moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that > authorizes the movement of

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-04 Thread Jonathan Arnold
fbsd_user wrote: Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? You can grab ISO of the latest build from here: http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/ At least, you used to be able to. Not sure exactly how up to date they are. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
[ please don't post on top, tnx ] On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500 "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable > release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from > moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circl

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: > Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable > release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from > moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that > authorizes the movement of development bra

RE: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread fbsd_user
: fbsd_user Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: > Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download > images? No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered after that. H

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: > Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download > images? No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered after that. However, binary patches are being produced by Colin Percival's FreeBSD-update serv

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
fbsd_user wrote: Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? Not sure, but certainly not put into -RELEASES. I imagine you'd have to grab a "snapshot" ISO Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Matthew Seaman wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was still "officially supported" and every other advisory up to this one has been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for example.

RE: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread fbsd_user
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download images? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Seaman Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:40 AM To: Ronald Clark Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest security advisory and

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0600, Ronald Clark wrote: > I have what I hope is a simple question. If I cvsup my sources and > complete the makeworld and installworld processes, will that install the > patch, or do I need to apply manually and recompile the kernel? (I have > been under the i

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: > I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was > still "officially supported" and every other advisory up to this one has > been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for > example. So am I to assume

RE: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ronald Clark
patch when sources were updated) Thanks in advance for the clarification, Ron Clark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 7:29 AM To: Ed Budd Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest security

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Ed Budd
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:29:14 + Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: > > > Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's > > security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)? > > > > On the one hand it says that this affects

Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: > Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's > security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)? > > On the one hand it says that this affects "All FreeBSD releases" but on > the other hand only lists STABLE, 5.2, 5.2.1, 4.9 and 4.