On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
> release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
> moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that
> authorizes the movement of
fbsd_user wrote:
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
You can grab ISO of the latest build from here:
http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/
At least, you used to be able to. Not sure exactly how up to date
they are.
--
Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ please don't post on top, tnx ]
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
> release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
> moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circl
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
> release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
> moving to the stable branch. Are you in the inter-circle that
> authorizes the movement of development bra
: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
> images?
No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered
after that. H
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:54:22AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
> images?
No -- the iso images are produced at release time and not altered
after that. However, binary patches are being produced by Colin
Percival's FreeBSD-update serv
fbsd_user wrote:
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
Not sure, but certainly not put into -RELEASES.
I imagine you'd have to grab a "snapshot" ISO
Kevin Kinsey
DaleCo, S.P.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was
still "officially supported" and every other advisory up to this one has
been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for
example.
Are the security advisory fixes rolled into the .iso ftp download
images?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew
Seaman
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:40 AM
To: Ronald Clark
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: latest security advisory and
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0600, Ronald Clark wrote:
> I have what I hope is a simple question. If I cvsup my sources and
> complete the makeworld and installworld processes, will that install the
> patch, or do I need to apply manually and recompile the kernel? (I have
> been under the i
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
> I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was
> still "officially supported" and every other advisory up to this one has
> been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for
> example. So am I to assume
patch when sources were updated)
Thanks in advance for the clarification,
Ron Clark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 7:29 AM
To: Ed Budd
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: latest security
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:29:14 +
Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
>
> > Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's
> > security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)?
> >
> > On the one hand it says that this affects
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote:
> Can anyone confirm whether 5.1R is affected by yesterday's
> security advisory (FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp)?
>
> On the one hand it says that this affects "All FreeBSD releases" but on
> the other hand only lists STABLE, 5.2, 5.2.1, 4.9 and 4.
14 matches
Mail list logo