Re: make buildworld powers down system

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 03:28:09 -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 02:06:26 -0500 (EST), d...@safeport.com wrote: The screen does go into standby and I am not sure what is controling that

Re: make buildworld powers down system

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 03:28:09 -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 02:06:26 -0500 (EST), d...@safeport.com wrote: > > > The screen does go into standby and I am not > > > sure what is controling that, nothing in KDE or Xorg

Re: make buildworld powers down system

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 02:06:26 -0500 (EST), d...@safeport.com wrote: > > The screen does go into standby and I am not > > sure what is controling that, nothing in KDE or Xorg that I set, perhaps > a > > sysctl setting but I did not see one in the a

Re: make buildworld powers down system

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 02:06:26 -0500 (EST), d...@safeport.com wrote: > The screen does go into standby and I am not > sure what is controling that, nothing in KDE or Xorg that I set, perhaps a > sysctl setting but I did not see one in the acpi section. This might be a dafault option. You can overri

Re: make buildworld powers down system

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Robert Bonomi wrote: From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Dec 1 01:16:21 2011 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:14:04 -0500 (EST) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: make buildworld powers down system Three times in a row. It seems to be repeatable. A

Re: make buildworld powers down system

> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Dec 1 01:16:21 2011 > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:14:04 -0500 (EST) > From: doug > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: make buildworld powers down system > > Three times in a row. It seems to be repeatable. At the end what should my >

Re: Make buildworld don't run

From: Michael Powell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 4:00 PM Subject: Re: Make buildworld don't run Zantgo wrote: > I write "make buildworld", this is the answer: > > #make buildworld > m

Re: Make buildworld don't run

Zantgo wrote: > > El 02-11-2011, a las 17:00, Michael Powell > escribió: > >> If your only exposure to date with computers has been with Windows and >> you are looking to expand your reach, you will first find that the *Nix >> world is heavy on reading documentation and trying to figure stuff

Re: Make buildworld don't run

El 02-11-2011, a las 17:00, Michael Powell escribió: > If your only exposure to date with computers has been with Windows and you > are looking to expand your reach, you will first find that the *Nix world is > heavy on reading documentation and trying to figure stuff out for yourself > firs

Re: Make buildworld don't run

Zantgo wrote: > I write "make buildworld", this is the answer: > > #make buildworld > make: don't know how to make buildworld. Stop Since this works just fine for all those who have learned how to use FreeBSD I can only assume this indicates you do not know what you are doing. > PS: I use Fre

Re: Make buildworld don't run

El 02-11-2011, a las 16:33, Jerry McAllister escribió: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:45:39PM -0300, Zantgo wrote: > >> I write "make buildworld", this is the answer: >> >> #make buildworld >> make: don't know how to make buildworld. Stop >> >> PS: I use FreeBSD 9.0 RC1, and I try to follow curr

Re: Make buildworld don't run

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:45:39PM -0300, Zantgo wrote: > I write "make buildworld", this is the answer: > > #make buildworld > make: don't know how to make buildworld. Stop > > PS: I use FreeBSD 9.0 RC1, and I try to follow current What user/permissions did you have? Which directory were you i

Re: Make buildworld don't run

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Zantgo wrote: > I write "make buildworld", this is the answer: > > #make buildworld > make: don't know how to make buildworld. Stop > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-qu

Re: make buildworld errors

/freebsd-current/attachments/20091101/4084 8244/ifmcstat.obj Regards, // Mem - On 1st of January 2011 Manolis Kiagias wrote: - Subject: Re: make buildworld errors From: Manolis Kiagias Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:35:37 -0800 On 01/01/2011 9:54 ?.?., Mike wrote: > > Trying to buil

Re: make buildworld errors

On 01/01/2011 9:54 ?.?., Mike wrote: > > Trying to buildworld but it keeps failing. I finally deleted /usr/src > and recopyed from a cd then cvsup using standard-supfile. Tried > limiting how much ram freebsd uses and only using one stick of ram. > All attempts have failed at the same place. Would

Re: make buildworld runs out of space

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Bill Tillman wrote: > I have built two machines with 8.0-STABLE-201002-amd64. When I updated > the sources and ran make buildworld process it would fail claiming > that / was full. > > It seems to be running into the problem when the make installkernel >

Re: make buildworld runs out of space

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 20:08, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Bill Tillman > wrote: >> I rebuilt the machines with 1G / and all was well. But one >> shouldn't have to do this as 512M for / should be adequate. > > It's not only the new kernel - a backup of the previ

Re: make buildworld runs out of space

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:38:06 -0700 (PDT), Bill Tillman wrote: > I rebuilt the machines with 1G / and all was well. But one > shouldn't have to do this as 512M for / should be adequate. It's not only the new kernel - a backup of the previous existing kernel is kept in /boot (and so on /). If you

Re: Make buildworld

> I did some testing, at least for me, I get the most improvements when the > number > of cores or processors equals the -j number. You can make it higher, even > double it, withoout hurting things, but 95% of the improvements come from > matching the number of processes to the number of availabl

Re: Make buildworld

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian wrote: > Jos Chrispijn wrote: >> Can someone tell me the difference between 'make -j2 buildworld' and >> 'make -j4 buildworld' ? >> >> Thanks, >> Jos >> ___ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Make buildworld

Jos Chrispijn wrote: Can someone tell me the difference between 'make -j2 buildworld' and 'make -j4 buildworld' ? Thanks, Jos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, se

RE: Make buildworld

$ man make ... -j max_jobs Specify the maximum number of jobs that make may have running at any one time. Turns compatibility mode off, unless the -B flag is also specified. HTH - Tobias > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh

Re: make buildworld

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Aguiar Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > How can i fix the error below ? > > Thanks, > > Aguiar > > > # make buildworld > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include > -I/usr/s

Re: make buildworld 6.x on 7.x?

Kris Kennaway wrote: Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: Hi, Is it possible to do a ''make buildworld buildkernel'' of the FreeBSD 6.x series sources on a FreeBSD 7.x machine and then install them onto a FreeBSD 6.x machine? Yes, I did this a few minutes ago in fact :) No special procedures are ne

Re: make buildworld 6.x on 7.x?

Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: Hi, Is it possible to do a ''make buildworld buildkernel'' of the FreeBSD 6.x series sources on a FreeBSD 7.x machine and then install them onto a FreeBSD 6.x machine? Yes, I did this a few minutes ago in fact :) No special procedures are necessary, world builds a

Re: make buildworld fails

Jamie Avery wrote: > put KERNCONF=/kernelname/ into /etc/make.conf. However, when I make > buildkernel, I get the following error 7.x+ src.conf, below make.conf grep KERNCONF /etc/make.conf /etc/src.conf /etc/src.conf:KERNCONF?= RIDERWAY NO /s neccessary. --

Re: make buildworld (6-STABLE) -> stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdbserver

Hi, I think you did not see an earlier thread started by me started by me. I am also facing similar problem and you will find more details if you go through the thread. It seems gdb Makefile is the culprit. Right now I have commented out build of gdbserver and "buildworld" is running. Let's wait

Re: make buildworld ....gcc bug

James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 23:01 +0200, tethys ocean wrote: >> When I am rebuilding world FreeBSD 6.2 I have take error that is >> shown below. What can I do!? > The current version of gcc for FreeBSD is 4.2. Not in RELENG_6. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PR

Re: make buildworld ....gcc bug

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:42:58 -0700 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 23:01 +0200, tethys ocean wrote: > > > When I am rebuilding world FreeBSD 6.2 I have take error that is > > shown below. What can I do!? > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]# make buildworld > > > > >

Re: make buildworld ....gcc bug

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:01:21PM +0200, tethys ocean wrote: > When I am rebuilding world FreeBSD 6.2 I have take error that is > shown below. What can I do!? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]# make buildworld > In function `yylex': > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils

Re: make buildworld ....gcc bug

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 23:01 +0200, tethys ocean wrote: > When I am rebuilding world FreeBSD 6.2 I have take error that is > shown below. What can I do!? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]# make buildworld > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 syst

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

At 08:19 PM 7/27/2007 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:12:26AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > so I deleted /usr/src > redownloaded from a different mirror and tried > make buildworld again... > > It still failed -but this time at a different point: Standard behaviour of faili

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:12:26AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > so I deleted /usr/src > redownloaded from a different mirror and tried > make buildworld again... > > It still failed -but this time at a different point: Standard behaviour of failing hardware - most likely memory. -- Jonathan Chen

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

so I deleted /usr/src redownloaded from a different mirror and tried make buildworld again... It still failed -but this time at a different point: mkdep -f .depend -a-DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc/..

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

At 09:16 AM 07/26/2007, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: Am Donnerstag 26 Juli 2007 15:54:36 schrieb J.D. Bronson: > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. Mo

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

Am Donnerstag 26 Juli 2007 15:54:36 schrieb J.D. Bronson: > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. Most probably a (physical) memory error. As the message s

Re: make Buildworld fails...why?

Mark Stout wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to upgrade a 5.4-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE and having a bit of > a problem. > > Downloaded and untar's the source files for base, catpages, dict, doc, > games, info, manpages, proflibs, and src directories per INSTALL.TXT in the > releases/.../src dire

Re: make buildworld error

On 2007-03-20 00:21, Dino Vliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > on my pc , > > CPU: VIA C3 Samuel 2 (796.10-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 > Features=0x803035 > real memory = 503250944 (479 MB) > avail memory = 483028992 (460 MB) > > I get

RE: Make buildworld fail due to sendmail/sasl installation.

Well my last copying the header files all over the place apparently helped because now I'm down to the linker not being able to find the libraries. Suggestions? ===> libexec/mail.local cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL=2

Re: make buildworld errors

"Jacob Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, I am attempting to update my FreeBSD 6.0 installation's source > tree directly after the install. I have cvsup'ed "src-all" and run > "make buildworld" in /usr/src. However, this command fails in a > different spot each time with a segmentation

Re: make buildworld errors

memtest is a good start, but isn't definate. I would recommend running memtest86, which you can get at http://www.memtest86.com/, overnight or longer and see if it comes up with anything. I had some wierd problems with compilling and this let me know that one of my sticks was bad. replaced them an

Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On 5/9/06, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /us

Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? [] is

Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:21:52PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.

[SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? # (Intel CPUs) nocona pentium4[m] prescott pentium3[m] pentium

Re: make buildworld fails

Here's what I would try. Upgrade to RELENG_4 via the cvsup/buildworld process, read Bruce Mah's 4.11-5.X Migration Guide, and be sure and include "mergemaster -p" in your buildworld cycle. Can you tell me where is that migration guide? When I google for it, I only get posts about that gui

Re: make buildworld fails

gandalf wrote: Hello, I have this file /etc/sup.sys: *default host=cvsup.hu.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Then I traverse to /usr and execute this command: cvsup /etc/sup.sys

Re: make buildworld

On 2005-12-26 23:49, Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am upgrading a server to 6.0 and encountered an error in make > buildworld. However, I don't know what the error was as I piped > stdout to a file, but not stderr. I usually keep them both, with something like: # cd /usr/src/

Re: make buildworld

Doug Hardie schrieb: I am upgrading a server to 6.0 and encountered an error in make buildworld. However, I don't know what the error was as I piped stdout to a file, but not stderr. It was fairly near the end so I really hate to restart from the beginning again. The master server is a f

Re: make buildworld failure

On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 09:54 -0600, Dan Ross wrote: > I am trying to build a new kernel with smp. I started with make clean > and got no errors. > I then type make buildworld from /usr/src directory > suggestions? 1. You do not need to recompile world if you only want to build a new kernel with

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:12:50AM -1000, Robert Marella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Anthony > > Did you remove everything under the /usr/obj directory before make > buildworld? > > Good luck > Robert I now have, and that fixed the problem. Thanks for you help! Anthony _

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 03:11:46 -0600 Anthony Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to upgrade from 5.4 to 6.0. I ran cvsup and tried a make > buildworld, but it failed. So I checked out the handbook and noticed > that it mentioned I should run a mergemaster -p first. So I did t

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Monday 05 December 2005 09:51, Anthony Philipp wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:41:15AM +, > > Benjamin Sobotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey! > > > > You might want to have a look at > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > > > > especially

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:41:15AM +, Benjamin Sobotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey! > > You might want to have a look at > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > > especially subsection > > 20.4.16.6. What do I do if something goes wrong > I w

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

Hey! You might want to have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html especially subsection 20.4.16.6. What do I do if something goes wrong Further, I believe that you run mergemaster -p before make installworld. Not buildworld, after all I believe bu

Re: make buildworld run twice as fast

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:19:41PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote: > I recently rebuilt my FreeBSD system from sources and it took around 2 > hours on an old PIII 800MHz pc to run "make buildworld". If I include > the -j option to run multiple processes as once such as "make -j2 > buildworld" does t

Re: make buildworld fails on step 1.2 and questions

On Sep 20, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Chris wrote: A few things - If you are using CURRENT (anything) you have posted to the wrong list - try FreeBSD-CURRENT. K. If your a newb (as you seem to be), you should be using either 5.4-RELEASE or 4.11-RELEASE Meh. I just want to get my hands dir

Re: make buildworld fails on step 1.2 and questions

Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello, > I'm building my OS from source from the first time, and I realize > that I must have missed a step in configuring it properly. I just hate > treading through a lot of documentation when there isn't a really nice > search feature involved, so if someone can gi

RE: make buildworld + make buildkernel

Thanks Giorgos, I figured as much, but wasn't sure, thanks again, Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giorgos Keramidas Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:41 AM To: Middaugh, Bob Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re:

Re: make buildworld + make buildkernel

On 2005-09-13 10:32, "Middaugh, Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was in the process of doing make buildworld, make buildkernel, etc... > Make buildworld complete, but before I could do make buildkernel, etc... my > machine shutdown - power outtage. My question is, do I have to redo make > build

[solved] Re: make buildworld breaks in ncurses

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:10:29PM -0700, Mac Mason wrote: > While running a make buildworld on a system that was cvsup'd to > RELENG_5_4 about an hour ago, it breaks on > > [snip]/contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/make_keys.c > > with > > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/i386/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc >

Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED]

Marius Korsmo wrote: That does not look like an *old* version, it looks like a completely different file. Did you install anything not from ports that might have overwritten it? Did you try and install a port into a target hierarchy that /usr/local? (The same copyright header as the real 5

Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED]

Quoting Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Marius Korsmo wrote: It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few questions. The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. < /*- < * Cop

RE: make buildworld error

> I keep getting the following on a 4.9 system when trying to move to > 4.11. > > rm -f sa main.o pdb.o usrdb.o sa.8.gz sa.8.cat.gz > rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > ===> usr.sbin/setkey > ".depend", line 1: Need an operator > ".depend", line 2: Need an operator > ".depend", line 3: Need

Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED]

Marius Korsmo wrote: It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few questions. The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. < /*- < * Copyright (c) 1993 < *The Regents of the Univer

Re: make buildworld fails

Yes. You're using unsupported optimizations. Please read very carefully the comments above CFLAGS in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf - Giorgos Thanks a lot! I'll use a safer optimization. Valeiro ___ freebsd-questions@freebs

Re: make buildworld fails

On 2005-06-22 14:38, Valerio Daelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then I started to make buildworld. But it fails with this error: > __ > > cc -O3 -mtune=pentium4 -march=pentium4 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math > -march=pentium4 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include > -I/usr/src

Re: make buildworld errors

Charles Swiger wrote: Actually, if the compile crashes out at different points, that's almost a sure sign of a hardware issue, most probably overheating. If you were just running the system as a network router before, that involves so little load that you wouldn't stress anything, but building

Re: Make buildworld and UPDATING

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:11:27AM -0600, CHris Rich wrote: > While reading updating I see this: > > 20050227: > The default "world" build no longer supports running on an > 80386 CPU. In order to build a world for an 80386 CPU, one > needs to set CPUTYPE=i386 in /etc/make

Re: make buildworld errors

On Mar 17, 2005, at 4:43 PM, luke wrote: this is the 3rd place it's stopped, and like i said, if i repeat the make buildworld command it will go a little further and stop again. i'm going to start using time make buildworld and see if there is a pattern here. this machine has been acting as a slack

Re: make buildworld errors

On Thursday 17 March 2005 01:43 pm, luke wrote: > i just cvsup'd to release_5_3 and i'm making buildworld but it keeps > erroring out. > if i do make buildworld again, chaning nothing, it goes a little > further and errors > again. i've done this a few times. here's my /etc/make.conf These are u

Re: make buildworld

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:40:48 +0100 (CET), richard clairboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I face w/ problem when i execute make buildworld after > i've synced my source from the CVS current 5.3 > release. > What is the problem you are getting, if possible I'd post the error message to the list. -p

Re: Make buildworld and reboot

On Tuesday 08 March 2005 12:31 pm, Bnonn wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I recently let a make buildworld run overnight following updating > source, and came back in the morning to find that the process had > completed successfully, but that my keyboard had gone completely > dead. I don't know why this h

Re: make buildworld

On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:28:15AM -0700, RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > I am trying to make buildworld for freebsd 5.3 stable and have done > a complete cvsup and keep getting the following error messages. > Please help If you want to track -stable you should read the -stable mailing list. This prob

Re: make buildworld broke

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:18:58PM -0500, lists wrote: > I had a box crash and I got it up again. I lost some information in / and > /etc. > After some reconstructing, it seems to be running fine and all the services > are working. I wanted to do > a buildworld just to update anything I might have

Re: make buildworld error

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:45:52 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 January 2005 01:49 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:11:32 +0530, Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The correct way would be CPUTYPE=k8 as all "Hammers" are basically > > > hav

Re: make buildworld error

On Saturday 29 January 2005 01:49 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:11:32 +0530, Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The correct way would be CPUTYPE=k8 as all "Hammers" are basically > > having K8 cores. This is also revealed in dmesg. > > my dmesg > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-53

Re: make buildworld error

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:11:32 +0530, Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The correct way would be CPUTYPE=k8 as all "Hammers" are basically having K8 > cores. This is also revealed in dmesg. my dmesg CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-53 Processor (2400.01-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0

RE: make buildworld error

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donald J. O'Neill > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 0:57 > To: Gert Cuykens > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: make buildworld error > &g

Re: make buildworld error

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:37:59 +0100, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:33:12 +0100, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:27:15 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:55 am, Gert Cuykens

Re: make buildworld error

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:33:12 +0100, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:27:15 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:55 am, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:17:59 +0100, Peter Harmsen > > <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: make buildworld error

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:27:15 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:55 am, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:17:59 +0100, Peter Harmsen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Seems to me you specified amd64 in /etc/makeconf. > > > If i remember

Re: make buildworld error

On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:55 am, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:17:59 +0100, Peter Harmsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems to me you specified amd64 in /etc/makeconf. > > If i remember correctly from some posts ago this is obsolete. > > You can however switch to 32-bit mode

Re: make buildworld error

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:17:59 +0100, Peter Harmsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems to me you specified amd64 in /etc/makeconf. > If i remember correctly from some posts ago this is obsolete. > You can however switch to 32-bit mode by specifying athlon-xp. > Otherwise everything should be auto d

Re: make buildworld error

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:40:25 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you have in your /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/config file, show me > about the first 30 lines of it. config is the kernel config right ? i only did make cleanworld and make buildworld wasnt compiling the kernel

Re: make buildworld error

On Saturday 29 January 2005 02:56 am, Gert Cuykens wrote: > ... > cd /usr/src/etc; make buildincludes; make installincludes > ===> etc/sendmail > ===> etc/sendmail > > -- > > >>> stage 4.2: building libraries > > --

Re: make buildworld 5.3.0

On Sunday 26 December 2004 23:24, jason henson wrote: > > Finally, start from where you started: > > > > cd /usr/src > > make buildworld > > make installworld > > ... etc > > > > Make sure you read /usr/src/UPDATING (all the way through) before you > > restart > > "make buildworld" > > > > good luc

Re: make buildworld 5.3.0

Finally, start from where you started: cd /usr/src make buildworld make installworld ... etc Make sure you read /usr/src/UPDATING (all the way through) before you restart "make buildworld" good luck! ___ Maybe he doesn't need to read it all the way throu

Re: make buildworld 5.3.0

On Sunday 26 December 2004 18:45, sdhawley wrote: > Thanks for any help > stewart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Errors at end of make buildworld > xml.o(.text+0x1764): more undefined references to `xmalloc' follow > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/makeinfo. > *** Error code 1 >

Re: make buildworld dies

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:49:53AM -0500, Zachary Huang wrote: > Sorry for so many questions. On yet another FreeBSD (4.2), I first > did a sysinstall to upgrade to 5.10, it messed up everything because > the source (/usr/src) did not match all the config files, so sendmail > complains a lot and c

Re: make buildworld dies

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:49:53 -0500, Zachary Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for so many questions. On yet another FreeBSD (4.2), I first > did a sysinstall to upgrade to 5.10, Wha? 4.2 is very old. and 5.3 is the latest production release. I'll assume the above is a typo for 4.10. I'm

Re: make buildworld failing

try rm'ing your source tree and re-cvsup'ing Lo How could u do that? I'm interesting coz I've also got some problems cd /usr/src rm -rf * Then follow the instructions in the handbook for cvsup: Vonleigh Simmons

Re: make buildworld failing

>>>While trying to update to 5.3 stable, buildworld errors out on >>> >>> me. I'm >>> running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11. Following is part of the output, >>> if you need more output please let me know. No luck looking up the >>> errors in google, so your help is appreciated. >> >> try rm'in

Re: make buildworld failing

While trying to update to 5.3 stable, buildworld errors out on me. I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11. Following is part of the output, if you need more output please let me know. No luck looking up the errors in google, so your help is appreciated. try rm'ing your source tree and re-cvs

Re: make buildworld failing

On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:09:18 -0800, Vonleigh Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >While trying to update to 5.3 stable, buildworld errors out on me. I'm > running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11. Following is part of the output, if > you need more output please let me know. No luck looking up the e

Re: make buildworld failed at suidperl

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > Have you tried cvsuping from another source ? Yes, didn't help. > NOPERL=true The make buildworld work but make buildkernel exit with: ===> snp @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include perl @/kern/vnode_if

Re: make buildworld failed at suidperl

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:26:51 +0100, Matthias Teege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moin, > > I try a cd /usr/src && make buildworld. > > It fails with: > > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/suidperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/suidperl -DIAMSUID-c sper

Re: make buildworld.........24 hours????

Brian Bobowski wrote: Chuck Swiger wrote: Using -j is recommended only when you have lots of memory and can keep all of the processes resident in memory. Trying to run a parallel build on a low-memory machine is almost certainly going to be much slower, since you are going to swap more, not les

Re: make buildworld.........24 hours????

Chuck Swiger wrote: Using -j is recommended only when you have lots of memory and can keep all of the processes resident in memory. Trying to run a parallel build on a low-memory machine is almost certainly going to be much slower, since you are going to swap more, not less. Time it for yourse

Re: make buildworld.........24 hours????

Brian Bobowski wrote: [ ... ] One thing I have to wonder - how compatible is 'make buildworld' with multiple build processes(e.g. 'make -j4 buildworld')? I know some makefiles don't get along well with the -j parameter, but if buildworld is okay with it, this may offer a way to keep the

  1   2   3   >