On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:30:45AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Your missing the whole point.
>
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
> the names.
> Pkg_add -r points t
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> This thread is not intended to point fingers at any one or start an
> flame war.
> Just trying to point out problem and get some kind of feedback from
> the
> list of their thought on the subject.
To be honest, I'm not sure that anyone else considers this
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> Yes, but doing it that way as example, entering 'apache' would
> download apache13 when I really wanted apache20. That logic does
> not follow through, it's only valid for single versions of an
> package.
Yes, it's true that the 'apache' package gets you
: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: RE: ports & package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and
Behalf Of David Fleck
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: RE: ports & package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find por
2003 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: ports & package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:30:45 -0500
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your missing the whole point.
>
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> h
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
> the names.
> Pkg_add -r points to directory location with out names with
> versions suff
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:30:45 -0500
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your missing the whole point.
>
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
> the names.
> Pkg_
ednesday, December 31, 2003 12:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; Kris Kennaway
Subject: Re: ports & package names changing?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:07:32AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> I an running 4.9 the pkg_add -r command default path is
> /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packa
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:07:32AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> I an running 4.9 the pkg_add -r command default path is
> /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/Lastest/
> All the names in that location do not have versions suffix appended
> to the name.
>
> Though /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/pac
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 9:08 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: ports & package names changing?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:42:42PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
> names that
>
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:42:42PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
> names that
> you select on to include the version number as an suffix on the
> name?
What do you mean? Packages already include the version number in the
name.
Kris
pg
12 matches
Mail list logo
