On Wed November 26 2003 23:41, Dragoncrest wrote:
> Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer
> Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and does as good a
> job as mergemaster with less thinking involved on the part of the user. :)
>
> At 12:43 AM 11/20/0
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Dragoncrest wrote:
> Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer
> Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and
> does as good a job as mergemaster with less thinking involved
> on the part of the user. :)
Confusion
Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer
Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and does as good a
job as mergemaster with less thinking involved on the part of the user. :)
Just CVsup your ports, then do "portupgrade -r -all", then walk
away an
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:27:59AM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> if I upgrade from 4.8 to 4.9, will I also have to upgrade (by whatever
> method) the applications running on the box? I.e. those that are not
> part of the src tree?
On the whole... no. But that doesn't mean you won't run into
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:24 am, Lewis Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:13:29AM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> > is there a method (other than de-installing all pkgs and reisntalling)
> > to upgrade the ports or packages appropriately from 4.8 to 4.9?
>
> Not quite sure I fully unders
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:13:29AM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> is there a method (other than de-installing all pkgs and reisntalling)
> to upgrade the ports or packages appropriately from 4.8 to 4.9?
Not quite sure I fully understand, but you might want to take a look at
portupgrade (portu
