Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-19 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On May 12, 2009 6:33:03 AM -0700 Peter Steele wrote: So, based on what I've read here and in my searches, for wake-on-LAN to work on a given system, the NIC itself has to support this feature, and in addition the OS has to be able to enable this feature (via the driver for the NIC). It seems

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-14 Thread Peter Steele
>I just noticed my 7.2-R i386 PC-Engines ALIX2 board with vr devices show up >(WOL_UCAST,WOL_MAGIC) in the ifconfig listing. Seems they're making some of >it available in 7.2-RELEASE > >I'll have to test/try this out, I'm glad I'm starting to see it happen. Unfortunately we're pretty much stu

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-13 Thread Tim Judd
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:36:31AM -0700, Peter Steele typed: > > > FUD, read ifconfig(8) > > > > There is no mention of wake-on-LAN in the man page for ifconfig in 7.0. > I'd be interested in seeing if the 8.0 man page has added anything.

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-13 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:36:31AM -0700, Peter Steele typed: > > FUD, read ifconfig(8) > > There is no mention of wake-on-LAN in the man page for ifconfig in 7.0. I'd > be interested in seeing if the 8.0 man page has added anything. It has: wol, wol_ucast, wol_mcast, wol_magic

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Fabian Keil
Peter Steele wrote: > Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD > system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work? Yes, with CURRENT and re(4): f...@africanqueen ~ $pciconf -lv | grep -A 4 re0 r...@pci0:0:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x816910ec ch

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Peter
> --On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd wrote: >> >> I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the >> last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode >> the NIC gets set to and then the ACPI shuts the power off. >> >> Without this mode, the W

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Peter Steele
>In some cases (depending on the NIC and the BIOS) WOL works even without >OS support. It might be worth testing before you do anything else. I've tried various experiments with the wol command to try to wake up one of our boxes with no luck. We're using the stock nVidia driver. There is also n

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Laursen
Peter Steele wrote: I came across that same reference. Unfortunately we're stuck on 7.0. I take it the point of the "wol" command that available in the ports collection is that it can be used to wake any system that supports wake-on-LAN, and these systems can be running any OS. So, based on what

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Peter Steele
> FUD, read ifconfig(8) There is no mention of wake-on-LAN in the man page for ifconfig in 7.0. I'd be interested in seeing if the 8.0 man page has added anything. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Peter Steele
>Tim, I know nothing about WOL on FreeBSD, but according to the wiki, >development just started in 8 CURRENT: >http://wiki.freebsd.org/WakeOnLan I came across that same reference. Unfortunately we're stuck on 7.0. I take it the point of the "wol" command that available in the ports collection

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-12 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 5/12/09, Tim Judd wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Peter Steele wrote: > >> Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD >> system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work? >> > > Search the archives. The question of Wake-on-LAN has bee

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Tim Judd
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd wrote: > >> >> I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the >> last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode >> the NIC gets set to and then the

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd wrote: I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode the NIC gets set to and then the ACPI shuts the power off. Without this mode, the WOL packets get t

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Tim Judd
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Wojciech Puchar < woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD >> system? >> > > wake on lan works before any OS is started, actually before computer is > powered up - as it's made to power up

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts the NIC in a mode at shutdown that allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has isn't it BIOS option? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD system? wake on lan works before any OS is started, actually before computer is powered up - as it's made to power up computer by LAN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Peter Steele
> Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts the > NIC in a mode at shutdown that >allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has no > Wake-on-LAN driver support, hence, no host running FreeBSD has >Wake-on-LAN > capabilities. > >I'm shocked that the Intel NICs don't

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

2009-05-11 Thread Tim Judd
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Peter Steele wrote: > Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD > system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work? > Search the archives. The question of Wake-on-LAN has been around for a while. I typically res

Re: wake-on-lan support?

2003-11-02 Thread Manuel Rabade
I also use wake-on-lan to turn on my laptop from my nat box when i leave it home, i have a 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL (the xl driver) and works fine, the only thing that i setup to make it work was my bios: turn on the 'Wake-On-Lan' option. On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:25:40AM +0100, Elessar w

Re: wake-on-lan support?

2003-11-02 Thread Elessar
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:29:40 +0100 Alexander Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > is wake-on-lan possible on a PC running FreeBSD? I want to boot my > FreeBSD-PC with wake-on-lan. In Linux there is a problem with many > drivers because they disable wake-on-lan. Only a few drivers give the

Re: wake-on-lan support? (WOL)

2003-11-02 Thread Q
This is mostly true, but the NIC driver also needs to ensure that it leaves this feature enabled after it has reset the hardware and set it up to it's liking. If the driver doesn't have WOL awareness the feature will more likely be disabled during the attach phase of loading the driver. Using "On

Re: wake-on-lan support? (WOL)

2003-11-01 Thread Alexander Mayer
Hi, Alexander Kühn wrote: powered down. You need to enable it in the PC bios and for some NICs also in the NIC's BIOS as well (e.g. RTL 8139) using a NIC specific tool But most drivers in Linux disable WOL per default (on the NIC). It's a common problem: WOL works if I boot into Windows then sh

Re: wake-on-lan support? (WOL)

2003-11-01 Thread Alexander Kühn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Wake-On-Lan (WOL) is something that has next to nothing to do with the installed OS. If it's a x86 PC you need a ATX power supply and board, a network card that supports WOL, have the powerconnector of the network card connected to the board, so it