On Friday 09 May 2008 14:40:06 Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> Now I would like to mount ext3 partition from FreeBSD at least for reading,
> or vice versa, UFS2 from linux for writing. With kernel option EXT2FS, I
> can
I mounted UFS2 paritions under Linux like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ grep fbsd7 /et
I have installed a linux distro on a partition of my machine (latest
Mandriva i686, default installation). I only need it to use a piece of
software for Nikon Coolscan IV film scanner (yes, sane works, but a cheap
commercial package called vuescan has better interface and uses some
hardware feature
On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Move this line down and place it after mounting of /usr.
Thanks.
That was actually one of the first things I tried, I guess I must have
screwed-up something else at the time.
___
freebsd-quest
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:31:33 +0100 RW wrote:
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:26, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
> > > On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> > > but it's complaining th
On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:26, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> > but it's complaining that /compat/linux
>
> Who? Can you provide us with some
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> > Can't confirm that the problem exists:
> > $ uname -a
> > FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
> > 23:26:59 MS
>
> On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
>
> > Can't confirm that the problem exists:
> > $ uname -a
> > FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
> > 23:26:59 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/us
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> Can't confirm that the problem exists:
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
> 23:26:59 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SRV i3
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > I tried it and it didn't work. Irrespective of whether it should begin
> > linproc
> > or linprocfs, /compat is a link to /usr/compat, and /usr isn't mounted at
> > that point. Do you have a different arrangement?
Would it be possible to submit the output of 'dme
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 August 2006 21:55, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> > > What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
> > >
> > > I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
> > >
> > > linproc/compat
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 21:55, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
> >
> > I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
> >
> > linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
> >
> > But in a st
RW wrote:
> What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
>
> I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
>
> linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
>
> But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which
>
What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which
isn't mounted until pass 2.
Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has passed and the machine has been
shut down and rebooted a few times. After that initial success, I have
never been able to mount that [EMAIL PROTECTED] drive again. I invariably get a
Operation not permitted
error. What gives? How can I retrieve my form
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:39:16AM -0500, Damon Butler wrote:
> I recompiled my kernel, including the "options EXT2FS" option line. No
> problem. After rebooting, I was able to successfully mount my linux
> drive thusly:
>
> mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /linux
>
> I transferred some files and
sysctl -a | grep securelevel ?
Regards
S.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:52:06 -0500, Damon Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grégory Nou wrote:
> > May sound as a stupid question, but did you actually logged as root, or
> > su before performing this command ?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Have yo
Grégory Nou wrote:
May sound as a stupid question, but did you actually logged as root, or
su before performing this command ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Have you tried to mount the drive as root?
Heh. Yes indeed, first thing I tried. I've also tried mounting the drive
as virtually every other us
I recompiled my kernel, including the "options EXT2FS" option line. No
problem. After rebooting, I was able to successfully mount my linux
drive thusly:
mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /linux
I transferred some files and was very happy.
Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has passed and the mach
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 08:23, John Widenoja wrote:
Your linux fs must be ext2 or ext3
Compile in the kernel the
option EXT2FS
command line after reboot
mount_ext2 /dev/adxxx /mnt with eventually the -o ro option gentoo for
example).
Kind regards.
Jens
> I appologize in advance for havi
I appologize in advance for having to ask this question. I have skimmed
through the manual, and have missed the answer.
I use BSD on a disk which is 50-50 win 98 and 5.2. I use, on the same
computer win ME and RH linux 8.0. I can access the dos partitions with
no problem using "mount_msdosfs",
> -Original Message-
> From: User & [mailto:User &]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 December 2003 8:43 AM
> To: DG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mounting linux filesystems
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Do you happen to know where to add these options in the
> kernel?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Pekarske
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 December 2003 3:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mounting linux filesystems
>
>
> I have two disks (IDE) that came from a dismantled Lin
I have two disks (IDE) that came from a dismantled Linux workstation. I
would like to scan them for files worthy of saving.
Is there any tool which will allow me to mount and read files from a
linux filesystem?
Thank you,
Bob Pekarske
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
+-- Joshua Oreman [freebsd] [26-08-03 21:21 IST]:
| On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:03:33AM -0400 or thereabouts, dave wrote:
| > Hello,
| > I'm trying to mount a linux ext3 partition. I understand that it's
| > possible to do it using the ext2 kernel driver so i've recompiled a kernel
| > with that
"dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mount_ext2fs /dev/ad1 /mnt
ad1 means the whole disk.
> The data for partition 1 is:
> sysid 131 (0x83),(Linux native)
> start 63, size 78156162 (38162 Meg), flag 80 (active)
> beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1;
> end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63
Then you wa
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:03:33AM -0400 or thereabouts, dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to mount a linux ext3 partition. I understand that it's
> possible to do it using the ext2 kernel driver so i've recompiled a kernel
> with that option in it. When i do:
> mount_ext2fs /dev/ad1 /mnt
> thi
Hello,
I'm trying to mount a linux ext3 partition. I understand that it's
possible to do it using the ext2 kernel driver so i've recompiled a kernel
with that option in it. When i do:
mount_ext2fs /dev/ad1 /mnt
this is what i get.
ad1: 38166MB [77545/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100
ext2fs: ad1:
27 matches
Mail list logo
