On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:30:45AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Your missing the whole point.
>
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
> the names.
> Pkg_add -r points t
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> This thread is not intended to point fingers at any one or start an
> flame war.
> Just trying to point out problem and get some kind of feedback from
> the
> list of their thought on the subject.
To be honest, I'm not sure that anyone else considers this
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> Yes, but doing it that way as example, entering 'apache' would
> download apache13 when I really wanted apache20. That logic does
> not follow through, it's only valid for single versions of an
> package.
Yes, it's true that the 'apache' package gets you
: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: RE: ports & package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and
Behalf Of David Fleck
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: RE: ports & package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find por
2003 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: ports & package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:30:45 -0500
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your missing the whole point.
>
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> h
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
> the names.
> Pkg_add -r points to directory location with out names with
> versions suff
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:30:45 -0500
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your missing the whole point.
>
> The FBSD handbook says to use
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
> names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
> the names.
> Pkg_
ednesday, December 31, 2003 12:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; Kris Kennaway
Subject: Re: ports & package names changing?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:07:32AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> I an running 4.9 the pkg_add -r command default path is
> /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packa
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:07:32AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> I an running 4.9 the pkg_add -r command default path is
> /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/Lastest/
> All the names in that location do not have versions suffix appended
> to the name.
>
> Though /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/pac
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 9:08 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: ports & package names changing?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:42:42PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
> names that
>
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:42:42PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
> names that
> you select on to include the version number as an suffix on the
> name?
What do you mean? Packages already include the version number in the
name.
Kris
pg
Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
names that
you select on to include the version number as an suffix on the
name?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
13 matches
Mail list logo