Re: Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:00:50AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 > > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: > > &g

Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe All of these drivers generate warnings in FreeBSD 12 and to the best of my knowledge, none have cleared

Re: Address Collision using i386 4G/4G Memory Split

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:58:05PM -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote: > Alexander Lochmann writes: > > According to git commit e3089a (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1463) > > FreeBSD 12.0 i386 uses separate address spaces for kernel and user > > space. So basically two memory areas, one in each space, can

Re: SCSI and dmesg

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:01:01AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:49 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:09 AM Alan Somers wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:57 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:32 PM Maxim

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-18:15.loader

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:32:54AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 28.11.2018 4:22, FreeBSD Errata Notices wrote: > > > Affects:All supported versions of FreeBSD. > > Corrected: 2018-10-24 23:17:17 UTC (stable/11, 11.2-STABLE) > > 2018-11-27 19:45:25 UTC (releng/11.2,

Re: "sockstat: struct xinpgen size mismatch" in 11.2-p4 jail on 12-STABLE host

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 09:17:23AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > I updated a system yesterday to the latest 12-STABLE as part of the upcoming > 12-RELEASE cycle. I've installed several BETA and at least one RC of 12 > since updating from 11-STABLE as part of the 12 cycle and have had no >

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 06:54:01AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > > > of a comma > > > > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:06:48PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, > > > > smc, > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc, > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > vr

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:22PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Remember, it's not simply deprecating cards less than 1Gig. > > I have a card that is 10/100 only, but works fine with the gigabit alc driver: > > alc0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem > 0xe050-0xe053 irq 16 at device 0.0 on

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

s a person who has edited every driver in the tree multiple times in the last year (mostly in an external tree), I will consider this process successful even if we keep the majority of listed drivers in the tree. On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:05:16PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> Pl

FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

ion list. The full FCP-0101 is included below. -- Brooks --- authors: Brooks Davis state: feedback --- # FCP 101: Deprecation and removal of 10/100 Ethernet drivers Deprecate most 10 and 10/100Mbps Ethernet drivers and remove them before FreeBSD 13. ## Problem Statement Each network driver create

Re: svn commit: r332493 - stable/11/sys/net

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 08:54:15AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On 14 April 2018 at 07:31, Magnus Ringman wrote: > > Hi Brooks, this MFC missed your r331077 > > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14706) thus stable buildkernel currently > > breaks on missing those two macros. > > Thanks

Re: Calling nxge(4) users

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE > > adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the > > company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant > > users of

Calling nxge(4) users

The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant users of this device and plan to remove it from FreeBSD-12 if not. -- Brooks signature.asc

Re: i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:09:44AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Andre Albsmeier < > andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 10:32:44 -0600, Mike Karels wrote: > > > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 15:57, Andre Albsmeier

Impending NATM removal

As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. This includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is time to move on. The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883 --

Re: Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4)

freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Brooks Davis > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:33 AM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Subject: Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4) > > Our current ATM stack s

Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4)

Our current ATM stack supports a small number of NICs that were current in the late 90s[0]. None of them have been manufactured in a long time and while you can buy hatm(4) devices on e-bay, it's increasingly difficult to find a motherboard that will accept them. I'd like to propose removing

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:16:16PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > I'll demur just a bit on your points. > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > > > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:53:08AM -0500, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1&quo

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with. > > Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD > supported? I have

Re: MFC r282973 (disable libgomp build) and r283060 (disable libgcov build)?

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: On 24 Jul, Matthieu Volat wrote: I'm not fond of lang/gcc as openmp provider: if a port use c++, it will cause linkage headaches with libc++ (I never was able to have graphics/darktable working, for example). You might want to

Re: buildworld without libncursesw

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:47:44AM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: On 4/03/2015 8:13 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: Is there a preferred way to buildworld without libncursesw? When I add to /etc/src.conf WITHOUT_NCURSESW=yes

Re: buildworld without libncursesw

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: Is there a preferred way to buildworld without libncursesw? When I add to /etc/src.conf WITHOUT_NCURSESW=yes I find that a buildworld fails due to missing libncursesw.*. So what uses libncurses? These guys do

Re: include/c++/v1 still in BSD.include.dist as well as in obsolete_files

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:22:55PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On Jun 18, 2013, at 21:03, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: When I run make check-old, the /usr/include/c++/v1 and v1/ext directories are listed as old, but they are still present in BSD.include.dist, so are recreated

Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After around 5 minutes of compile time, the process just hangs on same place. No error. I've tried compiling different commits from this week with the same

Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error

, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After around 5 minutes of compile time, the process just hangs on same place. No error. I've

Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error

of an issue. Thanks, Brooks On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After around 5 minutes

Re: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:22:44PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:15:02AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: Not unless you consider adding new functions in a reserved namespace (str*) to be ABI breakage. Well, what often happens is that when we add new functions, ports

[RFC] possible non-backward-compatible change to install(1)

In CURRENT I have added a number of features to the install(1) command that are derived from NetBSD. One of them is the -M metalog option that causes new-style mtree entries to be emitted for each object that is created in the target. In the interest of compatibility and usability I removed the

Re: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:06:27AM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2013-01-16 13:05, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: I just updated my stable/9 system

Re: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:01:00PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2013-01-16 13:05, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: I just updated my stable/9 system after clang3.2 was added. My system is amd64, both world and kernel are

Re: What is negative group permissions? (Re: narawntapu security run output)

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +, jb wrote: Mikhail T. mi+thun at aldan.algebra.com writes: On 23.12.2012 11:48, Chris Rees wrote: They involve a lot of thought to get right, as well as chmod g-w on something where you probably meant chmod go-w is a disastrous but

Re: Why not provide libclang.so in base?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:31:04AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-18 14:54, Yanhui Shen wrote: I'm using clang-complete plugin in vim, it claims with libclang.so instead of bin/clang it works better. However libclang.so is not installed by a default make buildworld make

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:52:00PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:38 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:30 -0700, Boris Kochergin wrote: On 10/15/10 12:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:04:53AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: So, trying

Re: Hardware

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:02:59PM -0300, M?rcio Luciano Donada wrote: Hi, We buy some hardware, new, but came with processors exchanged below what we ask. However, the manufacturing of hardware, informed us that we could install everything and then just replace the processor. how will I use

Re: install root certificates

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:59:31PM -0500, Xian Chen wrote: Hello, I use 8.0 Release on my thinkpad T42 laptop and want to connect to the WIFI AP near me. The AP is encrypted by WPA2. I also need some root certifications installed ( UTN-USERFirst-Hardware ). I install

Re: booting off GPT partitions

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: Hey I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel D945GCLF2) having

Re: booting off GPT partitions

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote: GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based bootstrap that can handle GPT-labelled

Re: dhclient starts after NETWORK

On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:04:20PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: Hello, On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:02:26 +0100 Ronald Klop ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org wrote: Does ifconfig_rl0=SYNCDHCP help? synchronous_dhclient=YES helps for me, ntpdate syncs after I changed rc.conf with it. Hmm,

Re: dhclient starts after NETWORK

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:03:39PM +0300, al...@ulgsm.ru wrote: Wrong order in /etc/rc.d scripts ~]rcorder /etc/rc.d/* | grep -n -e dhclient -e ntp 66:/etc/rc.d/ntpdate 112:/etc/rc.d/ntpd 139:/etc/rc.d/dhclient Then ifconfig_rl0=DHCP? ntpdate can`t sync time. It is right to add

Re: Base system's Heimdal with Openldap support?

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: Peter C. Lai wrote: What happens when you portupgrade? You will have to deal with rebuilding that part of world? Not unless the shared library version number changes, that's the beauty of shared libraries. Unfortunatly we're

Re: svn commit: r197065 - in stable/8: etc/defaults lib/libc/stdlib sys/amd64/conf sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: 2009/9/10 Ken Smith kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu: On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 15:29 +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: This seems like a step backwards to me: crash dumps have been left enabled in 7.x and have proved very useful from the point

Re: ifconfig_ed0=DHCP does not work on 8.0-BETA3

On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Ven 4 sep 09 ? 23:57:47 +0200, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org ?crivait?: This is a know issue with some devices supported by ed(4). You can work around it by changing DHCP to SYNCDHCP which will cause dhclient

Re: ifconfig_ed0=DHCP does not work on 8.0-BETA3

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Mer 9 sep 09 ? 17:52:57 +0200, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org ?crivait?: I'd rather not mention the link state changed message since I'd love to see it go away. How's this? Seems good, go! Thanks. I've committed

Re: ifconfig_ed0=DHCP does not work on 8.0-BETA3

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:41:48PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:38:11PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Hello, I have a machine with the following ethernet PCI card: ed0: RealTek 8029 port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 ed0: WARNING: using

Re: ue0 dhclient FBSD8-BETA2

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:05:43PM -0500, Paul A. Procacci wrote: Gents, Since the name changed for my cdce device, booting up the OS fails to obtain an address via dhcp on this interface. dhclient works normally after the machine is booted and I provide the command on the command line.

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:56:14PM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: I've got a 9 sata drive raidz1 array, started at version 6, upgraded to version 13. I had an apparent drive failure, and then at some point, a kernel panic (unrelated to ZFS.) The reboot caused the device numbers to shuffle,

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:40:02AM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Freddie Cashfjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mahlon E. Smith mah...@martini.nu wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2009, Freddie Cash wrote: This is why we've started using glabel(8)

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:32:12AM +1000, Andrew Snow wrote: Mahlon E. Smith wrote: Strangely, the ETA is jumping all over the place, from 50 hours to 2000+ hours. Never seen the percent complete over 0.01% done, but then it goes back to 0.00%. Are you taking snapshots from crontab?

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:53:17AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: I'm seeing essentially the same think on an 8.0-BETA1 box with an 8-disk raidz1 pool. Every once in a while the system makes it to 0.05% done and gives a vaguely

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote: On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:20:34PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a warning that values of network_interfaces other than

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote: Doug Barton wrote: If you use a value of network_interfaces other than AUTO please speak up so that we can make an intelligent decision about this issue. Maybe I am wrong, setting network_interfaces is the way I found I had to

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:51:25PM -0500, David Kelly wrote: On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Doug Barton wrote: Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Doug Barton wrote: Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a warning that values of network_interfaces other than AUTO are

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 07:22:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: To repeat what I wrote earlier today on another list there's no need to worry about hot plugged or newly added interfaces getting magically configured to do dhcp or anything else[0]. such as detected by services such as

Re: dhclient cant renew lease.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:40:15PM +0100, Peter Ankerst?l wrote: Hi Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE on my gateway and for the last week or so it cant renew its dhcp-lease. At boot-time it sends a request to broadcast: DHCPREQUEST on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 And then it gets an

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:31:48AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote: This is very odd. I got desperate last night and steeled myself for a reinstall. Copied all the known keeper files to an alternate drive including /home, /etc, /usr/local/etc and a couple others. It's on a completely separate drive

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

[This question would be better to ask on the freebsd-questions list, but see below.] On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:41:40AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote: Hello List, I'm trying to upgrade my system from 6_2 to 7_1 and cannot seem to do it. Perhaps I'm missing something. Here is the basic procedure I'm

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

OK, now I feel like an idiot, I completely misread the middle of your e-mail. You might still want to check out freebsd-update since it's a lot quicker than rebuilding, but that's not your issue here. On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:35:55PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: [This question would be better

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

mergemaster, you have not updated /etc/motd so it shows 6.2... Obviously among the other files. And, as pointed by Brooks Davis you should have rebooted before running make installworld. Try also reading the comments in /usr/src/Makefile

Re: FreeBSD6.2 to 7.1 Remote update

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:52:32AM +0300, l1nyx...@googlemail.com wrote: , FreeBSD-stable. It's real? I have one server with hard to access physically. Can I update him to new release over ssh only? It's quite possible if you're careful, but there are plenty of ways to do it

Re: dhclient doing DISCOVER with bad IP checksum - bge

On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:27:58AM -0800, Jonathan Feally wrote: Sorry for the cross-post, but this could be either lists problem. I have 2 boxes running 7-STABLE as of 20081130, both i386 SMP. One is running ISC DHCPD 3.0.x from recent ports, and the other dhclient from make world. The

Re: Fwd: FreeBSD 7.1 Content

On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 08:06:24AM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote: The ports tree distribution tarball provided on the installation disks is another area that needs some consideration. I suspect that many people aren't aware of the need for adoption:

Re: machine hangs on occasion - correlated with ssh break-in attempts

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:03:09PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Finally, consider moving to pf instead, if you really feel ipfw is what's causing your machine to crash. You might be pleasantly surprised by the syntax, and

Re: infrastructure

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27:37AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: How do I get in touch with FreeBSD infrastructure people about mailing list set up? Sorry to post here, but I've scoured the web site and cannot find anything more appropriate. Is there a [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something

Re: dhclient and resolv.conf.sav

when we took their client (which is derived from an early ISC client). If it's not in the stock isc dhclient-script adding it would be trivial. -- Brooks On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57:41AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:52:35AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello

Re: dhclient and resolv.conf.sav

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:52:35AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello, we have been bitten by something that obvoiusly is a feature, not a bug, but I do not quite understand the intentions and reasoning behind it. I have a host with manual interface and resolver configuration and an

Re: 6.3 stability and freebsd-update (was: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3)

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote: On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote: Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average more stable than 6.2. I really

Re: Two DHCP servers

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:09:06PM +0200, Szemer?dy G?bor wrote: Hello! We have a DHCP server listening on subnet 192.168.42.0. (On the server with address 192.168.42.1) One of the addresses , lets say 192.168.42.11 , we plan to use as a LTSP server for thin clients. So we installed the

Re: QA on textdumps (fwd)

On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: Dear all, I've now completed the MFC of basic textdump support to 7.0. Once I've had a chance to ping Brooks about it, either he or I will MFC support for ddb.conf, which allows configuring textdump and debugging scripts

Re: CVS tag for 7.0 - standard

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:18:26AM -0600, JD Bronson wrote: Can someone kindly tell me the CVS tag to follow the 7.0 patch branch (only)? I am running 7.0Beta1 and want to stay with that only. Nothing newer like the 'stable' branch. It seems that the tag I am using is 7.0-stable?

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:32:42PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Brooks Davis wrote: BD On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: BD BD [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in BD [EMAIL PROTECTED] BD

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear colleagues, any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? machine is mostly IO-bound,

Re: Background process

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:03:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I connect to my freebsd box via ssh using putty from a WindowsXP workstation, I want to run a process on the freebsd box, then close my ssh session (closing putty) while keeping the process running. So I run my

Re: install on USB flash memory

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:47:03PM +0200, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: Karel Miklav : Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I think this has been discussed before. The problem is that FreeBSD's bootloader doesn't support booting off of such devices, thus you need to use GRUB or another

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Kevin Way wrote: I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts that caused this command to be executed

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote: FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has existed historically, and the term alias is what is used in reference to rc.conf ifconfig_iface_aliasX entries.

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote: FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has existed historically, and the term alias is what is used

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: ipv4_addrs_interface is a much better replacement IMO. It's easy to use and doesn't required the hackish pseudo array traversal used

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:07:39AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: What do you need to set? It's sets IP and netmask. It doesn't handle broadcast, but I'd be pretty suprised if that's needed often. What else is needed? Axing

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:06:59PM +0200, John Hay wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:37:53AM +0100, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300 JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the problem here is that ifconfig_nic=inet IP ifconfig_nic=ether MAC does not work on one line and does not work on two either, the latter

Re: Desired behaviour of ifconfig -alias

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 01:49:08PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:06:56PM -0500, Kevin Way wrote: I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts that caused this command to be executed: ifconfig bce0 -alias It turns out that this command

Re: dhclient taking up all CPU

from RELENG_6 ( line 285 == - =) According to the cvs commit log this fixes my problem. Still leaves me wondering why this was not applied to RELENG_6_1 Kind regards, Spil. On 05/11/06, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should be fixed in STABLE. The particular fixes were

Re: dhclient taking up all CPU

It should be fixed in STABLE. The particular fixes were to bpf.c so I belive (but have not verified) that if you grab the latest version of that file, put it in src/sbin/dhclient/ and rebuild dhclient the problems will go away. -- Brooks On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Spil Oss wrote:

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP port 995, leaving inetd

Re: kernel panic mounting /tmp - 6.2-PRERELEASE

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:25:58AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: Hi everyone, tonight when I started my laptop, i was welcomed with a very nice panic, which was happening JUST when mounting the filesystems. Some info: Fault code : supervisor read, page not present. current process :

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based services have occupied the well

Re: kernel panic mounting /tmp - 6.2-PRERELEASE

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:11:55AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:59:46 -0500 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a bigger issue here? anything I can do to help diagnose / debug this? Possibly and no. By recreating the file system you've

Re: kernel panic mounting /tmp - 6.2-PRERELEASE

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:39AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:33:50 -0500 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gotcha - i thought as much... i hoped a dump -0 would save enough info though. I just needed to have /tmp back in place asap i'll keep

Re: scp -c none (was Re: NFS client slow on amd64 6.2-PRERELEASE #2)

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:05:55AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:54 , Oliver Fromme wrote: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] It's really too bad the OpenBSD guys refuse to incorporate the HP (high-performance) patches into OpenSSH, and being

Re: Recommendations for a serial port card you can actually BUY?

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:33:13AM +1000, Greg Black wrote: On 2006-10-05, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:04:47PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote

Re: Recommendations for a serial port card you can actually BUY?

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: FreeBSD's USB support has always been somewhat deficient. For example, apcupsd can't talk to their UPSs over the USB bus, even though the software itself knows how, because FreeBSD doesn't know what a UPS is and throws up its

Re: Recommendations for a serial port card you can actually BUY?

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:04:47PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: FreeBSD's USB support has always been somewhat deficient. For example, apcupsd can't talk

Re: Drives always come up dirty after shutdown on 6.2-PRERELEASE.

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:10:10PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: Hey guys, I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so I've

Re: Drives always come up dirty after shutdown on 6.2-PRERELEASE.

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: Hey guys, I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so I've not idea whether this has been discussed already. On my laptop running 6.2-PRERELEASE the drives always mount dirty, which suggests that

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: Hi Scott, On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:16:57AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: Well, the best I can say at the moment is, Wow. =-( I guess the thing to do here is to figure out if the problem lies with the em interrupt

  1   2   3   >