Would have loved to use a stable branch (ie 8.2) instead of development
(9.0-CURRENT),
though. Especially for the new DELL servers with Perc H200 providing a snapshot
with
the changes would be greatly appreciated!
Hi Holger,
Go for 8-STABLE. Works fine for me. No need for CURRENT for
COOL! THANKS a LOT Alexander!
Can't believe it. You post a panic at 11pm and get a patch at 1pm next
day...? You must be crazy! ;)
Works for me. I patched against 8/stable. I'll be testing the machine a
bit more. But for now, no panics!
I guess the patch should be committed soon, also
Hello,
Just encountered a panic when starting pf (/etc/rc.d/pf start) on a
FreeBSD benjamin 8.0-STABLE
uname -a
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 26 18:33:44 UTC 2010
r...@benjamin:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BYTESATWORK_R8_INTEL_DEBUG amd64
the system is a Dell PowerEdge R300 with bge
Hello,
I just got a PowerEdge R300, which netbooted fine with 7.2-STABLE
(FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #6: Wed Dec 2 01:25:52 CET 2009), but is dropping
me into a panic right at boot with 8.0-STABLE (just built).
This is what I'm getting (please forgive the lazyness of not
transcribing
On 25.02.10 22:11, Lorenzo Perone wrote:
I just got a PowerEdge R300, which netbooted fine with 7.2-STABLE
(FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #6: Wed Dec 2 01:25:52 CET 2009), but is dropping me
into a panic right at boot with 8.0-STABLE (just built).
This is what I'm getting (please forgive the lazyness
Hi there,
just wondering, since the ZFS v13 update (to be precise, 7.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #11: Wed Jun 3 23:11:29 CEST 2009) why the USAGE
column in a zfs list -t snapshot is not showing anymore the space used
by the snapshot? I made those snapshots with zfs snapshot -r.
They're
info I'll be happy to contribute it.
Big Regards!
Lorenzo
On 01.06.2009, at 19:09, Lorenzo Perone wrote:
On 31.05.2009, at 09:18, Adam McDougall wrote:
I encountered the same symptoms today on both a 32bit and 64bit
brand new install using gptzfsboot. It works for me when I use
a copy
with this tomorrow night!
(any hint, btw, on why the one in -STABLE seems to be
broken, or whether it has actually been fixed by now?)
Regards,
Lorenzo
(...)
2009/5/28 Lorenzo Perone:
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors
On 29.05.2009, at 13:06, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2009-May-27 00:42:52 +0200, Lorenzo Perone lopez.on.the.li...@yellowspace.net
wrote:
On 27.05.2009, at 00:08, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Ruben van Staveren wrote:
On 26 May 2009, at 22:38, Christian Walther wrote:
it finished successfully
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel
is not found. the console shows:
forth not found
definitions not found
only not found
(the above repeated several times)
can't load
for your help...
Lorenzo
2009/5/28 Lorenzo Perone lopez.on.the.li...@yellowspace.net:
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel
is not found. the console shows:
forth
On 27.05.2009, at 14:48, Artis Caune wrote:
I tried booting from a disk with GPT scheme, with a /boot/loader
build
with LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes in make.conf. I get the following
error:
panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x2fd4a6ac from
/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/biosdisk.c:1053
MFC r185095
/25 Philipp Wuensche cryx-free...@h3q.com:
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hello to all,
Having licked blood now, and read the news from Kip Macy about
- zfs boot for all types now works
I was wondering if anyone has some updated tutorial on how to
achieve a
zfs-only bootable FreeBSD
On 27.05.2009, at 00:08, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Ruben van Staveren wrote:
On 26 May 2009, at 22:38, Christian Walther wrote:
it finished successfully. From my point of view it appears that
cvsup.de.freebsd.org is out of sync.
cvsup.de.freebsd.org is definitely out of sync. I had build
Hello to all,
Having licked blood now, and read the news from Kip Macy about
- zfs boot for all types now works
I was wondering if anyone has some updated tutorial on how to achieve
a zfs-only bootable FreeBSD with a mirrored zpool. While gmirror is a
very nice thing, and I suppose it
On 22.05.2009, at 11:45, Pertti Kosunen wrote:
Kirk Strauser wrote:
So far so good here (amd64, Core2 Duo, ICH9 SATA) but I'm too
chicken to upgrade the on-disk format yet.
Me too, upgraded pool to v13 yesterday and everything still ok.
Removed also all loader.conf tunables. Many thanks
On 20.05.2009, at 22:41, Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
At 05:59 PM 5/20/2009, Kip Macy wrote:
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new features
you
will no longer be able to use it with sources prior to today. 'zfs
Hi,
in one production case (1), haven't seen panics or deadlocks for a
long time, yet on another much more powerful machine (2), I could not
get rid of vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed, ultimately
rendering the machine useless pretty fast. This was at least till
RELENG_7/november
On 22.11.2008, at 00:58, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when
this
will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other
chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.
So in a post with no other bug report or
For what's worth it, I have similar problems on a comparable system
(amd64/8GB,
7.1-PRERELEASE #3: Sun Nov 16 13:39:43), which I wouldn't call
heavilly threaded yet (as there is only one mysql51 running,
and courier-mta/imap, max 15 users now).
Perhaps worth a note: Bjoern's multi-IP jail
the dance :-
Hope to have good news to report after a few weeks of
zfs-entertainment...
Thanx a lot and regards...
Lorenzo
On 31.10.2008, at 03:15, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Lorenzo Perone wrote:
On 22.10.2008, at 17:38, Freddie Cash wrote:
Personally, we use
I use ZFS since 7.0-RELEASE. I'm currently using latest stable.
Ok the load is not as a production one, as the box is used as a home
server (NAS), but the hardware is limited too (only 512MB of RAM,
mono-core A64 3200+, motherborad integrated sata controler).
I tried to stress the filesystem
On 22.10.2008, at 17:38, Freddie Cash wrote:
Personally, we use it in production for a remote backup box using
ZFS and
Rsync (64-bit FreeBSD 7-Stable from August, 2x dual-core Opteron
2200s, 8
GB DDR2 RAM, 24x 500 GB SATA disks attached to two 3Ware 9650/9550
controllers as single-disks).
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
with it, so far with success.
Bjoern has made an excellent
24 matches
Mail list logo
