Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and compare results with machine cost. Hope this will be usefull for someone. BENCHMARKS: OMNI3 (current cost 2400$): Intel entry server mainboard, intel 1U case, 20 2HDD MIRROR, 2GB ECC 533Mhz, Pentium D 3.4Ghz Built-in LSI MegaRAID RAID controller on the mainbopard. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE /bin/sh: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped /dev/ar0s1e 289385582 2514874 263719862 1%/usr Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10588607.7 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1293.5 MWIPS (10.6 secs, 10 samples) System Call Overhead 494540.4 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe Throughput 597906.5 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 34342.0 lps (12.3 secs, 10 samples) Process Creation 3009.9 lps (38.8 secs, 3 samples) Execl Throughput no measured results File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks464078.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 110822.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks110268.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 124661.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 86272.0 KBps ( File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 50327.0 KBps ( File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks1394205.0 KBps File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks67200.0 KBps ( File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 64455.0 KBps ( Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3212.6 lpm ( Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)579.2 lpm ( Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 293.2 lpm ( Arithmetic Test (type = short) 892425.3 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = int) 954128.2 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = long)298186.4 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = float) 1035063.3 lps Arithmetic Test (type = double) 516773.0 lps ( Arithoh 17328248.7 lps C Compiler Throughput 1815.1 lpm ( Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places 73558.8 lpm ( Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi 141070.4 lps ( INDEX VALUES TESTBASELINE Dhrystone 2 using register variables116700.0 1058 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 Execl Throughput43.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 11 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.05 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.06 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 59 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.03 Process Creation 126.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 49 OMNI2 (current cost approx 4000$): Supermicro mainboard, supermicro case. 360 3HDD RAID-5, 4GB ECC 400Mhz, DUal Xeon 2.67Ghz 3WARE 8 with 4 PORTS FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE /bin/sh: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), for FreeBSD 5.4-CURRENT (rev 2), dynamically linked ( uses shared libs), stripped /dev/twed0s1e 10154158 5684520 365730661%/usr Dhrystone 2 using register variables 3979893.5 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 837.4 MWIPS (10.3 secs, 10 samples) System Call Overhead 218348.2 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Pipe Throughput 236742.1 lps (10.1 secs, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 56205.9 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples) Process Creation 2662.7 lps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) Execl Throughput719.6 lps (29.6 secs, 3 samples) File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks250541.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks11986.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 12850.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 71142.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 10535.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 10247.0 KBps ( File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks617670.0 KBps ( File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks26746.0 KBps ( File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 21936.0 KBps ( Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1285.4 lpm ( Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)163.4 lpm ( Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 133.2 lpm ( Arithmetic Test (type = short) 630290.8 lps ( Arithmetic Test (type = int)
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running over IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run over IP eventually. Isn't it? Anyway, nobody said anothing about getting freebsd boot prompt over SOL. My guess, that this is THE MOST usefull usage of SOL for remote upgrades. I understand that this is not as simple as sending data to UART. THis is must be done explicitely in the boot loader, i thinks. But why no do it? -- Regards, Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: Hi All, On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason. You definitly need to use libthr (which is still CPU hungry, but works better). I don't think it is a problem with libpthread. FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Thanks for all. -- Renato Botelho garga @ FreeBSD.org freebsd @ galle.com.br GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc Love at first sight is one of the greatest labor-saving devices the world has ever seen. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
Artem Kuchin wrote: I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running over IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run over IP eventually. Isn't it? Anyway, nobody said anothing about getting freebsd boot prompt over SOL. My guess, that this is THE MOST usefull usage of SOL for remote upgrades. I understand that this is not as simple as sending data to UART. THis is must be done explicitely in the boot loader, i thinks. But why no do it? We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, on the system. Tom ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs
I was ripping one CD (SCSI CD-drive) and inserting another CD into an ATA CD-DRIVE. Suddenly the machine paniced... Although I have the crash dump, it seems corrupted -- kgdb can't print out the stack. The panic is: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs. Please, advise. Thanks! -mi ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em
On 3/4/07, Duane Whitty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: The Machine: I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU) cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.2.9 port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xda00-0xda01 irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 The machine has 4G RAM and a 3ware 9000 series RAID controller with 2 drives. pciconf -l says: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x15d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:1: class=0x02 card=0x15d9 chip=0x10968086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter (realtek), and it works straight away. tcpdump -n arp sees the same noise as other machines on that LAN. Sounds like it could be bad hardware. Can you swap nics? No he can't these are LOMs (on the motherboard). I read through the recent threads on the em driver, but didn't see any reported symptoms like this. Has anyone seen anything like this? Got any hints for me? Am I doing something stupid? Did I leave out any useful information about my configuration? Maybe more of your dmesg might help as it could show interrrupt issues that perhaps others could help diagnose Yes, agreed, this might be revealing. Jack If your NIC is knackered, where are you from? I can post you one I'm not using, instead of you buying one. It's a Realtek PCI 8139 10/100 Mb/s. Let me know if you're interested. Chris ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
Artem Kuchin wrote: I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running over IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run over IP eventually. Isn't it? Anyway, nobody said anothing about getting freebsd boot prompt over SOL. My guess, that this is THE MOST usefull usage of SOL for remote upgrades. I understand that this is not as simple as sending data to UART. THis is must be done explicitely in the boot loader, i thinks. But why no do it? We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, on the system. Aha! This is something already. When our system boot it says: Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: port may not be enabled Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: type 16550A Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled My guess is that sio0 is the real port and sio1 is the IPMI port of Intel AMT. But what does this message really say? What must i do to enable the port? The other question, do i need to include device ipmi in the kernel config? And how do i tell the boot loader to redirect its output to serial port? Sorry, working with freebsd for 10 years now but never touched this issue. -- Regads, Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
Artem Kuchin wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: snip/ We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, on the system. Aha! This is something already. When our system boot it says: Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: port may not be enabled Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: type 16550A Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled My guess is that sio0 is the real port and sio1 is the IPMI port of Intel AMT. But what does this message really say? What must i do to enable the port? The other question, do i need to include device ipmi in the kernel config? And how do i tell the boot loader to redirect its output to serial port? Sorry, working with freebsd for 10 years now but never touched this issue. This is the dmesg from our servers (sio1 is the ipmi SOL port): sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A, console As far as I know it is not required to have ipmi in the kernel (we dont have it in our kernels) to use the SOL port. This page should help you setup the serial console: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html Tom ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable?
Hi! I just setup a new machine and while it is supposed to be full SATA II i still see these lines in at kernel init: Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB Seagate ST3320620AS 3.AAE at ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB Seagate ST3320620AS 3.AAE at ata5-master SATA150 As you see, it says SATA150 , while the drives are SATA II (which is, as i understand, SATA 300). Both drives are connected to RAID controller and form a mirror raid: Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: 305108MB LSILogic v3 MegaRAID RAID1 status: READY Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad8 at ata4-master Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad10 at ata5-master Any idea how to make it work as SATA II? -- Regards, Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sunlabel trouble
Hi, This is on 6.2-STABLE, updated last week. I've added a new ~250 GB disc to my netra X1. It's working OK but somehow sunlabel is unwilling to install the bootstrap code on the disc because of some sizing issue with the c partition (whole disk). Even though sysinstall let me partition the disc just fine for some reason it has made the c partition way too small, causing the sunlabel -B command to error out. Any tips? ad1: 238475MB WDC WD2500JB-00REA0 20.00K20 at ata3-master UDMA66 # sunlabel -nB ad1 sunlabel: partition f extends past end of disk sunlabel: invalid label # # sunlabel ad1 # /dev/ad1: text: FreeBSD233G cyl 25767 alt 2 hd 16 sec 63 bytes/sector: 512 sectors/cylinder: 1008 sectors/unit: 25973136 8 partitions: # # Size is in sectors. # Offset is in cylinders. #size offset #-- -- a:1049328 0 b:4195296 1041 c: 25973136 0 d:4195296 5203 e:1049328 9365 f: 16778160 10406 g: 461127744 27051 cheers, Ruben ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: = How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is = memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing = will panic. = = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its = consumers. Then removing the -M flag and making swap backing the = default is a very sound choice. Thank you for correcting me. Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? Done in CURRENT. I'll MFC it in a week. -- Yar ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT (serial port redirection on Intel AMT)
- Original Message - From: Tom Judge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:04 PM Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT Artem Kuchin wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: snip/ We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that the IPMI serial port is connected to the system as COM2, which we select in the bios configuration. We then set device.hints so that the freebsd console is set to use the same port. We use the open source ipmitool to access the ipmi controller, and serial port, on the system. Aha! This is something already. When our system boot it says: Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: port may not be enabled Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio0: type 16550A Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Mar 5 23:59:04 aaa kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled My guess is that sio0 is the real port and sio1 is the IPMI port of Intel AMT. But what does this message really say? What must i do to enable the port? The other question, do i need to include device ipmi in the kernel config? And how do i tell the boot loader to redirect its output to serial port? Sorry, working with freebsd for 10 years now but never touched this issue. This is the dmesg from our servers (sio1 is the ipmi SOL port): sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A, console As far as I know it is not required to have ipmi in the kernel (we dont have it in our kernels) to use the SOL port. This page should help you setup the serial console: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html Hmm. i am stuck now. I have setup everything as described but still see nothing in SOL terminal when system boots (still can see BIOS). I can turn on video redirection to serial port COM1 in the BIOS and then i can see boot prompt and boot menu, but i cannot do anything there because keyboard is not working at all. Now i have the floowing questions: 1) What port is redirected over SOL in intel ? It is not COM1. 2) Can it do serial redirection at all? 3) Did anybody ever managed to set this thing up on Intel Server with AMT? My server is ENtry level SE7230ONH1-E -- Regards Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 vmstat 1 shows: # vmstat 1 procs memory pagedisks faults cpu r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr da0 da1 in sy cs us sy id 0 1577 0 7813112 657312 1553 9 1 1 1325 68 0 0 569 4774 2359 7 10 83 0 1578 0 7815368 656600 199 59 0 0 64 0 0 2 226 679 616 0 6 93 0 1578 0 7815368 656564 1120 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 208 638 608 1 8 91 0 1578 0 7815368 6565645 0 0 0 314 0 0 9 343 890 974 1 8 91 0 1578 0 7815368 656564 804 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 233 469 633 1 9 90 Normally I'd look for any mysql processes using alot of CPU, but I'm not finding anything using alot of CPU (this system is the only one we have using gmirror, if that helps any) ... - --On Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:10:53 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built Fri Feb 23 07:47:20 AST 2007, and the interface is an fxp0 device ... # ps auxl | grep ping root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 70555 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:05AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 73863 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:33AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 75857 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:49AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 76676 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:53AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 77048 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:54AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 80071 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 80198 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 5 j 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81210 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81212 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81841 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:25AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 88041 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D10:11AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 88418 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D10:13AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 89800 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D10:24AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 90774 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 91118 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 91635 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D11:04AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7YR94QvfyHIvDvMRAqo7AKCsPVLSXhtMD4pFd/ho2hoX3CL5cgCfcQmy HkV4+EgX4ue/gxVZzyuXE+U= =8YX2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7YZ54QvfyHIvDvMRAp2SAKCnpJJLgxI1SnkfE83L+xH05/981QCfYQBQ NUqCavoRoH8lo6ZPdXLyBFg= =Ww+Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built Fri Feb 23 07:47:20 AST 2007, and the interface is an fxp0 device ... # ps auxl | grep ping root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 70555 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:05AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 73863 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:33AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 75857 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 8:49AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 76676 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:53AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 77048 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 8:54AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 80071 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 80198 0.0 0.0 1452 520 ?? D 9:15AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 5 j 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81210 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81212 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:22AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 81841 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 9:25AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 88041 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D10:11AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 88418 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D10:13AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 89800 0.0 0.0 1452 524 ?? D10:24AM 0:00.01 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 90774 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 91118 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D10:58AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli root 91635 0.0 0.0 1452 556 ?? D11:04AM 0:00.00 ping -c 1 -t 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7YR94QvfyHIvDvMRAqo7AKCsPVLSXhtMD4pFd/ho2hoX3CL5cgCfcQmy HkV4+EgX4ue/gxVZzyuXE+U= =8YX2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:24:46AM +, Chris Rees wrote: If your NIC is knackered, where are you from? I can post you one I'm not using, instead of you buying one. It's a Realtek PCI 8139 10/100 Mb/s. Let me know if you're interested. Thank you very much for the offer! However, I have tried another NIC in the machine (a Realtek USB adaptor) and it worked normally. At that point I would suspect the hardware except that when this machine had linux loaded on it, it worked normally. The box is in a 1U case with no spare PCI slots, so I need the motherboard NIC to work for it to be useful long-term. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Costlow| Southwest Cyberport | Fax: +1-505-232-7975 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Web: www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992 abq-strange.com -- Interesting photos taken in Albuquerque, NM Last post: Art Is OK...And Dangerous - 2007-03-02 10:27:17 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
Hello Marc, You wrote on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 6:10:45 PM: MGF Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... MGF this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built Fri Feb MGF 23 07:47:20 AST 2007, and the interface is an fxp0 device ... MGF # ps auxl | grep ping MGF root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t MGF 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli This is know problem: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/errata.html There are some different cases when zonelimit livelock is possible. Send vmstat -z output (when processes lock in zonelimit state). -- Anton Yuzhaninov. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Hi, On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:40AM -0300, Carlos Horowicz wrote: Anybody tried this additionally in /etc/libmap.conf ? [/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1] libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 clamav-0.90_2 reduced CPU consumption for me on 6.2-Stable since I added the two sections in libmap.conf Apart from already running with libthr for clamav for a long time, I just changed my exim config: While having big CPU usage problems in the last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir plus the complete e-mail. That way clamd need to examine every single part and also checked the whole e-mail unpacking the structure by itself. When using the TCP socket the mail is just sent as a stream and clamd handles it completely. For us this was anyhow just the first step before moving clamd to a loadbalanced set of servers, so that a failing clamd does not affect exim anymore. - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
At 10:39 AM 3/6/2007, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before Perhaps this is why we were not seeing the high CPU usage post our upgrade, as we have the milters on our sendmail boxes talking back via TCP to a number of boxes running clamd. ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, March 06, 2007 18:59:04 +0300 Anton Yuzhaninov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Marc, You wrote on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 6:10:45 PM: MGF Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... MGF this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built Fri Feb MGF 23 07:47:20 AST 2007, and the interface is an fxp0 device ... MGF # ps auxl | grep ping MGF root 68994 0.0 0.0 1556 808 ?? D 7:58AM 0:00.02 ping -c 1 -t MGF 30 0 1 0 -16 0 zoneli This is know problem: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/errata.html There are some different cases when zonelimit livelock is possible. Send vmstat -z output (when processes lock in zonelimit state). Great, thanks ... just read the errata on zonelimit, and it seems to imply that it was fixed on the 12th of February, but (of course) it doesn't indicate which files ... I just did a new cvsup since my last one, and all that has changed is: Updating collection src-all/cvs Edit src/lib/libarchive/archive_read_extract.c Edit src/share/man/man4/tap.4 Edit src/share/man/man4/tun.4 Edit src/sys/amd64/conf/SMP Edit src/sys/dev/wi/if_wi_pccard.c Edit src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c Edit src/sys/net/if_tap.c Edit src/sys/net/if_tun.c Edit src/sys/netgraph/ng_ksocket.c Edit src/sys/netinet/ip_mroute.c Edit src/sys/netinet/tcp.h Finished successfully Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or if I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? Thanks ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7ZYU4QvfyHIvDvMRAhr6AKDQqpDNoCvq1UJYLbS4ayjcfZ2tSgCfawZX WNM499ARzFVvxW6ubUJtYDo= =ImQ+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or if I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? I think so. Try patching your system with: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.18 and perhaps also: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.293. Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir Interesting, am trying this now - have changed clamd to work via a socket, but do you still have the 'demime = *' in your config where the message is scanned ? Is this necessary anymore ? -pcf. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Hello, On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:45:37PM +, Pete French wrote: last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir Interesting, am trying this now - have changed clamd to work via a socket, but do you still have the 'demime = *' in your config where the message is scanned ? Is this necessary anymore ? Actually, the message gets unpacked by exim even without this option for the malware acl. It's removed, but doesn't give any difference. I don't know if it would have worked before, since it was already unpacked when the scanner was called. - Olli -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | pgp5prJfKpTyU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, March 07, 2007 00:44:25 +0800 ??/LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or if I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? I think so. Try patching your system with: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.18 and perhaps also: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.293. Here's what I have right now: __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 2007/02/11 03:31:18 mohans Exp $); * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $); __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $); __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.242.2.8 2007/02/03 04:01:22 bms Exp $); The only one that looks off is uipc_socket.c ... do I need to copy that from HEAD? Are there any compatibility issues with doing that? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7aKV4QvfyHIvDvMRAloYAKCsA0x+THahW+MZjW/8MjDZwsJDrgCcD4Qw WbA/0nXgvv4xwEDtBxirLlo= =Ro3T -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5
Sam Baskinger wrote: Juergen Nickelsen wrote: On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote: Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4 which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs. linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 Hm. I cannot imagine how this could lead to the problems I saw, but another thing to try. Thanks! Linux systems store tons of need-to-know data in the /proc file system. If you've ever installed a chrooted Linux environment you must 'mount -o bind' the /proc file system from the running system to the chroot for many OS functions to work correctly. I suspect that Java was looking for some process information in linprocfs and since it wasn't mounted, it blew up. :) Hope this clears up the why question. :) I have been having problems with this as well, I have the linprocfs mounted, but the buil is dying with the following error: ../../../src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1186 : warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for las t parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning return (IOException)ctr.newInstance(args); ^ ../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/StandardMetaDataImpl.java:637 : warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for las t parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning result = meth.invoke(instance,null); ^ ../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/MBeanInstantiatorImpl.java:16 2: warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for la st parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning moi= cons.newInstance(null); ^ Note: * uses or overrides a deprecated API. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. 21 errors 12 warnings gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. any offers? -- Bill ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
Artem Kuchin wrote: I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and compare results with machine cost. Hope this will be usefull for someone. Several things: a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole rectangles of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you copied it through Excel? b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now. c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare results :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
On 3/6/07, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as seen in their demo, can be used to control MS DOS prompt. well because it isnt using IP, besides SOIP is uninspiring :) Wait.. how so? I was sure that the whose SOL (IPMI) protocal is running over IP and i can REMOTELY (e.g. from anoth planet with IP connection) access the machine in the data center. If i can do such thing, then it DOES run over IP eventually. Isn't it? Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about the whole apparatus however :) Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
Artem Kuchin wrote: I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and compare results with machine cost. Hope this will be usefull for someone. Several things: a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole rectangles of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you copied it through Excel? Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing. Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it. b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now. oh! that's good. will retest. c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare results :) I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it. Which one is easier to install? -- Regards Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Had a similar behavior here, but with other MTA (qmail, clamdscan getting used from simscan). After raising MaxThreads from 10 (default) to 40 CPU usage got back to its normal consuming level. No idea if this info can help, but that was my recent experience. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Hi, I am running latest CVSUP branch today. Still having the same problem. Only way to reduce cpu usage is to increase maxthreads as others mentioned. What version it is fixed? is it not submitted through ports yet? Regards Dimi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Renato Botelho Sent: Friday, 2 March 2007 2:56 AM To: Alexander Shikoff Cc: Marko Lerota; Chris; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Daniel Eischen; Martin Blapp; Anton Karpov Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: Hi All, On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason. You definitly need to use libthr (which is still CPU hungry, but works better). I don't think it is a problem with libpthread. FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Thanks for all. -- Renato Botelho garga @ FreeBSD.org freebsd @ galle.com.br GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc Love at first sight is one of the greatest labor-saving devices the world has ever seen. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about the whole apparatus however :) :-) Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they do boot an embedded linux, and the command set is, shall we say, confusing... It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's connected to the public wires.
Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
Artem Kuchin wrote: a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole rectangles of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you copied it through Excel? Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing. Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it. See here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare results :) I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it. Which one is easier to install? Both CentOS (aka repacked RedHat Enterprise Server) and SuSE (actually, openSuSE which is free) are easy to install. But I think you'll have to compile unixbench for them. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
At 10:55 AM 3/1/2007, Renato Botelho wrote: FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db update) ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
On 3/6/07, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about the whole apparatus however :) :-) Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they do boot an embedded linux, and the command set is, shall we say, confusing... It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's connected to the public wires. Yes, this was a concern while i was at IBM as well, they were talking about configurations that would have the 'management' net seperated out from the public. That seems very expensive on infrastructure to me. Course when you have server farms with thousands of systems I suppose its complicated anyway. Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
See here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty terminal originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis are there. -- Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LOR #193
Hello. I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running gmirror and SMP if that matters). With reference to your question on http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/031048.html: What application you run that triggers the LOR ? Bacula, I guess. I'm taking filesystem snapshots, running the backup job and deleting the snapshots. In fact I've always seen some problems with some files in the snapshots not being accessible to bacula-fd. In a previous (quite old) thread it was in fact suggested I might be seeing some LOR, but only recently I activated all the debugging stuff. What's the risk of running the suggested patch on a (quite critical) production server? BTW: Sometimes, upon reboot, delayed fscks start and say that the filesystem cannot be fixed with -p and I should run a full fsck. If I reboot in single user mode and run a full fsck, it will find no errors. Also, I have a couple of other boxes on which I run bacula this way and I never experienced this problem: they are respectively i386/gmirror/UP and amd64/hardware RAID/SMP; so, might the combination of amd64/gmirror or gmirror/SMP be in the way? bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
Artem Kuchin wrote: See here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty terminal originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis are there. The block under the header: INDEX VALUES TESTBASELINE is important - it summarises the results and your post is missing the summaries :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, this was a concern while i was at IBM as well, they were talking about configurations that would have the 'management' net seperated out from the public. That seems very expensive on infrastructure to me. Course when you have server farms with thousands of systems I suppose its complicated anyway. If your infrastructure supports VLANs (and which one doesn't today) it's not so complicated. The company I work for have a separate management network. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen also an (ex) IBM'er ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processes get stuck in ufs state
Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that interacts with disk gets stuck in ufs state, but in my case SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. uname -a output: FreeBSD serv2.vsi.ru 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 i386 dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850 (2389.26-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x20f51 Stepping = 1 Features=0x78bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2 Features2=0x1SSE3 AMD Features=0xe2500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,LM,3DNow+,3DNow AMD Features2=0x1LAHF real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB) avail memory = 8350457856 (7963 MB) ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 1.1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 1.1 irqs 28-31 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 1.1 irqs 32-35 on motherboard ioapic4 Version 1.1 irqs 36-39 on motherboard ioapic5 Version 1.1 irqs 40-43 on motherboard ioapic6 Version 1.1 irqs 44-47 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: PTLTDXSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0xf008-0xf00b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff,0xf000-0xf07f,0xf080-0xf0ff iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfc90-0xfc900fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfc901000-0xfc901fff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci1: display, VGA at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: AMD 8111 UDMA133 controller port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1000-0x100f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 pci0: bridge at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 bge0: Broadcom BCM5704 A3, ASIC rev. 0x2003 mem 0xfe01-0xfe01,0xfe00-0xfe00 irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: MII bus on bge0 brgphy0: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:00 bge1: Broadcom BCM5704 A3, ASIC rev. 0x2003 mem 0xfe03-0xfe03,0xfe02-0xfe02 irq 26 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: MII bus on bge1 brgphy1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:01 mpt0: LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xfe05-0xfe05,0xfe04-0xfe04 irq 27 at device 4.0 on pci2 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.15.0 mpt0: Capabilities: ( RAID-1E RAID-1 SAFTE ) mpt0: 0 Active Volumes (1 Max) mpt0: 0 Hidden Drive Members (6 Max) pci0: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 pci0: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 11.1 (no driver attached) pcib4: ACPI Host-PCI bridge iomem 0xfe301000-0xfe301fff,0xfe303000-0xfe303fff,0xfe305000-0xfe305fff,0xfe307000-0xfe307fff on acpi0 pci32: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge mem
Processes get stuck in ufs state
Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that interacts with disk gets stuck in ufs state, but in my case SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. uname -a output: FreeBSD serv2.vsi.ru 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 i386 dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sat Mar 3 01:59:08 MSK 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/serv2 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850 (2389.26-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x20f51 Stepping = 1 Features=0x78bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2 Features2=0x1SSE3 AMD Features=0xe2500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,LM,3DNow+,3DNow AMD Features2=0x1LAHF real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB) avail memory = 8350457856 (7963 MB) ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 1.1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 1.1 irqs 28-31 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 1.1 irqs 32-35 on motherboard ioapic4 Version 1.1 irqs 36-39 on motherboard ioapic5 Version 1.1 irqs 40-43 on motherboard ioapic6 Version 1.1 irqs 44-47 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: PTLTDXSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0xf008-0xf00b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff,0xf000-0xf07f,0xf080-0xf0ff iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfc90-0xfc900fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfc901000-0xfc901fff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered pci1: display, VGA at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: AMD 8111 UDMA133 controller port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1000-0x100f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 pci0: bridge at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 bge0: Broadcom BCM5704 A3, ASIC rev. 0x2003 mem 0xfe01-0xfe01,0xfe00-0xfe00 irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: MII bus on bge0 brgphy0: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:00 bge1: Broadcom BCM5704 A3, ASIC rev. 0x2003 mem 0xfe03-0xfe03,0xfe02-0xfe02 irq 26 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: MII bus on bge1 brgphy1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:09:3d:13:fd:01 mpt0: LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xfe05-0xfe05,0xfe04-0xfe04 irq 27 at device 4.0 on pci2 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.15.0 mpt0: Capabilities: ( RAID-1E RAID-1 SAFTE ) mpt0: 0 Active Volumes (1 Max) mpt0: 0 Hidden Drive Members (6 Max) pci0: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 pci0: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 11.1 (no driver attached) pcib4: ACPI Host-PCI bridge iomem 0xfe301000-0xfe301fff,0xfe303000-0xfe303fff,0xfe305000-0xfe305fff,0xfe307000-0xfe307fff on acpi0 pci32: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge mem
Re: LOR #193
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running gmirror and SMP if that matters). With reference to your question on http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/031048.html: What application you run that triggers the LOR ? Bacula, I guess. I'm taking filesystem snapshots, running the backup job and deleting the snapshots. In fact I've always seen some problems with some files in the snapshots not being accessible to bacula-fd. In a previous (quite old) thread it was in fact suggested I might be seeing some LOR, but only recently I activated all the debugging stuff. The (usual) consequence of the LOR is lock up. What's the risk of running the suggested patch on a (quite critical) production server? It shall be safe unless you run filesystems compiled as modules, that where not built against patched kernel (patch changes the kernel binary interface). BTW: Sometimes, upon reboot, delayed fscks start and say that the filesystem cannot be fixed with -p and I should run a full fsck. If I reboot in single user mode and run a full fsck, it will find no errors. Also, I have a couple of other boxes on which I run bacula this way and I never experienced this problem: they are respectively i386/gmirror/UP and amd64/hardware RAID/SMP; so, might the combination of amd64/gmirror or gmirror/SMP be in the way? I doubt that gmirror could affect this. pgpZjnA9NT0tl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Processes get stuck in ufs state
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that interacts with disk gets stuck in ufs state, but in my case SIGSTOP/SIGCONT seemingly does not help. See developer handbook, Deadlock Debugging chapter for instruction what information shall be gathered to debug the problem. pgp97NW2c4Doa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?
Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] Here's what I have right now: __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 2007/02/11 03:31:18 mohans Exp $); * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $); __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v 1.119.2.19 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $); __FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v 1.242.2.8 2007/02/03 04:01:22 bms Exp $); The only one that looks off is uipc_socket.c ... do I need to copy that from HEAD? Are there any compatibility issues with doing that? No, you can not simply copy the file. Try patching your system with: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c.diff?r1=1.292r2=1.293 You can just ignore the first hunk. Please note that you may also need to modify uipc_socket2.c just in the way that this file is changed. Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5
- Juergen Nickelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... But indeed I was ignorant of the diablo port. What is the relation between these two ports anyway? I do not really get the difference, in spite of http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml. ... There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is distributation. The port, is just source, and does not require testing. A binary built from the port may or may not pass, depending on the current state of development. There can be regressions as things change in the OS, and linked in packages. The jdk has a fair number of dependencies, so it is pretty easy to blow-up a jdk build. Some of the developers on the FreeBSD java list have the TCK, and can tell if you if the port would pass the TCK. And you should really be asking about this on the FreeBSD java list, as they are constantly making changes to the port, and dependencies. Tom ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about the whole apparatus however :) :-) Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they do boot an embedded linux, and the command set is, shall we say, confusing... It scares me to have something like SOL on an ethernet that's connected to the public wires. ah, you don't believe in firewalls, i see :-) danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5
On 07. Mrz 2007, at 8:12, Tom Samplonius wrote: There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is distributation. The port, is just source, and does not require testing. A binary built from the port may or may not pass, depending on the current state of development. There can be regressions as things change in the OS, and linked in packages. The jdk has a fair number of dependencies, so it is pretty easy to blow-up a jdk build. I see. Thanks for the clarification! Regards, Juergen. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
