Re: NFS 4.1 RECLAIM_COMPLETE FS failed error in combination with ESXi client

NAGY Andreas wrote: >Compiling with the last patch also failed: > >error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSV4OPEN_WDSUPPFTYPE If you apply the attached patch along with wantdeleg.patch, it should build. At most, this will get rid of the warnings about invalid reason for not issuing a delegation,

Re: NFS 4.1 RECLAIM_COMPLETE FS failed error in combination with ESXi client

NAGY Andreas wrote: >Okay, that was the main reason for using NFS 4.1. >Is it planned to implement it, or is the focus on pNFS? Do the VMware people claim that this improves performance? (I know nothing about the world of VMs, but for real hardware I can't see any advantage of having more than

Re: DDD hangs on start on 11.1-R

On Monday, March 05, 2018 08:19:24 AM Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Trond Endrest�l wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:09+0100, Holm Tiffe wrote: > > > >> can anyone get ddd get to work in 11.1-R or stable? > > > > I've more or less given up on devel/ddd, since it relies on the old

Re: NFS 4.1 RECLAIM_COMPLETE FS failed error in combination with ESXi client

Okay, that was the main reason for using NFS 4.1. Is it planned to implement it, or is the focus on pNFS? Thanks, Andi Von: Rick Macklem Gesendet: 05.03.2018 11:49 nachm. An: NAGY Andreas; 'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org' Betreff: Re: NFS 4.1

Call for Testing: 11.1-RELEASE Meltdown/Spectre mitigation merge

Background -- A number of issues relating to speculative execution were found last year and publicly announced January 3rd. A variety of techniques used to mitigate these issues have been committed to FreeBSD-CURRENT and have been merged to the stable/11 branch. The changes will be

Re: [CFT] [X11] graphics/drm-next-kmod now builds, loads and works on FreeBSD-11-stable

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 11:33:57 -0800 Pete Wright wrote: > > Hey there - thanks for testing!  I would recommend posting an issue on > the Github repo for this.  If you could be sure to include which > revision you are running (11-stable or 12-current revision) in addition > to

[Bug 183817] [mac] kernel compiled with options INVARIANTS and MAC_PORTACL panices if loader loads mac_portacl.ko too

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable9?, mfc-stable10? |mfc-stable10+,