Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r242867: When will buildworld + clang + ccache be functional? I think I read somewhere that buildworld + clang - ccache was working fine now. Any info on date ccache will work with clang and when to try? Also, clang users - do you see any speed advantage for kernel / world /

Re: Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
Thanks to both. Care to not specify CCACHE_CPP2 for virtualbox and friends. Not true for Jails I assume? Define CCACHE_CPP2 as otherwise clang will yell at ccache Is this the same reason CMAKE yells at CCACHE? -- View this message in context:

Re: Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
Is this the same reason CMAKE yells at CCACHE? Haven't seen this before. Can you share? I meant for ports, not buildworld... I use bsdadminscripts and specify preferences in /usr/local/etc/buildflags.conf. I tried these and did not work. What is the setting for this, and I assume I can set

Re: Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
I think maybe it has to be like this: BUILDFLAGS_GCC_CC= clang BUILDFLAGS_GCC_CPP= clang BUILDFLAGS_GCC_CXX= clang But BUILDFLAGS_GCC_CXX looks at CCACHE_CPP2 I think and must be modified. -- View this message in context:

Re: Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
I think I made a mistake: clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) *** [tblgen] Error code 1 1 error *** [bootstrap-tools] Error code 2 1 error *** [_bootstrap-tools] Error code 2 1 error *** [buildworld] Error code 2 in /urs/local/buildflags.conf I have:

Re: Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
It breaks while spitting all these errors. I will try without ccache and see how that goes... undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' undefined reference to `__cxa_guard_acquire' undefined reference to `__cxa_guard_release' undefined reference to `__cxa_pure_virtual' undefined reference

Re: Latest for buildworld + clang + ccache

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
Sorry for my stupidity. I placed wrong entries: CPP= clang instead of clang-cpp CXX= clang instead of clang++ It works very beautifully now Spasiba vam bolshoi... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Latest-for-buildworld-clang-ccache-tp5763430p5763459.html

buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
I am doing a buildworld with clang on amd64 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r242867. In /etc/src.conf I have WITHOUT_GCC= yes. Compile progresses up to below then breaks: === usr.bin/xlint/xlint (all) === usr.bin/xlint/llib (all) lint -cghapbx -Cposix /asp/src/usr.bin/xlint/llib/llib-lposix lint -cghapbx

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
I hacked it with cd /usr/obj/asp/src/tmp/usr/bin/ # ln -s clang cc BUT NOW I HAVE: === lib/libz (install) sh /asp/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libz.a /usr/obj/asp/src/lib32/usr/lib32 sh /asp/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 /asp/src/lib/libz/zconf.h

buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
Looks like I should have placed these in my /etc/src.conf: WITH_CLANG= yes WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS= yes WITH_CLANG_IS_CC= yes I don't believe I will need anything under /usr/src/tools. How can I disable that in /etc/src.conf? The man page does not have that info. Thanks. -- View this message in

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
I am now stuck with trying to make this work. I am doing buildworld with clang and ccache enabled. 1. I have to keep re-starting buildworld at different points of break. When re-started the build continues past the last break-point and goes on to break somewhere else. 2. This continues until

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
Thanks for the suggestion. Build progressed a little further then had other problem: === gnu/lib/libstdc++ (all) building shared library libstdc++.so.6 /usr/obj/asp/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in a shared object. clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
OK, I disabled -j and ccache in the config file, deleted the entire previous build and re-started a plain old run of buildworld. Compile stopped at the exact same place as above (libstdc++) I did not remove WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=yes from /etc/src.conf. For ports building I have and use gcc-46, so I

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
I went ahead and hacked gnu/lib/Makefile and changed to: if ${MK_CXX} != no #SUBDIR+= libstdc++ libsupc++ .endif I then restarted buildworld. Next stop, new error: clang -m32 -march=k8 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -isystem /usr/obj/asp/src/lib32/usr/include/ -L/usr/obj/asp/src/lib32/usr/lib32

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-23 Thread Beeblebrox
Thanks for your answer. You've already been told that WITHOUT_GCC is currently unsupported. No, I have not been informed of that. If you are referring to this by V Kostryko: And WITHOUT_GCC is not right thing to do for now, gcc is still needed for a number of ports. I understood his message

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-24 Thread Beeblebrox
Hi Dimitry, I have been working at this for 6 hours today (I don't want to tell you how long I was at it yesterday). Thanks for your input / suggestions. I will try to answer all of them, please let me know if I forget something. 1. Fist the good news: I have just now finished buildworld with

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-24 Thread Beeblebrox
I just finished installkernel + installworld - I'm up and running with world that has WITHOUT_GCC= yes!! Just for reference: I ran into this chronic error at installworld: (to paraphrase) can't find btx/btx loader something... I keep a separate section in my notes for chronic recurring errors.

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-24 Thread Beeblebrox
@ Dr. Seaman: Ahh yes, forgot about script. Thanks. @ Chuck So I hear you like spam. Hipster Monty Python talked about spam before it was cool: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE Bonus: The Lumberjack Song is an alternative to the spam song:

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-26 Thread Beeblebrox
Some strange errors continue - I'm not complaining, just informing: /asp/src/release # make release OR # make cdrom etc.. breaks at kernel.txz: === zlib (install) install -o root -g wheel -m 555 zlib.ko //usr/obj/asp/src/release/dist/kernel/boot/kernel kldxref

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-26 Thread Beeblebrox
Dimitry Andric-4 wrote As said earlier, since you seem to be doing multithreaded builds, the actual error is obscured here. It will have occurred some time before the part of the log you posted. Thanks for your help Dimitry. I commented out THREADS = 6 in buildflags.conf and re-ran make

Question regarding /etc/src.conf

2012-12-16 Thread Beeblebrox
Hi I have a question about src.conf for buildworld: I would like to exclude building a number of modules which I do not need in world, so I cretated a file modex.conf in a new directory /etc/make. Then, in makefile.conf I tried placing: .include /etc/make/modex.conf WITHOUT_MODULES=

Question regarding /etc/src.conf

2012-12-16 Thread Beeblebrox
WITHOUT_MODULES= ... in make.conf traditionally Exactly - that's why my /etc/make/modex.conf has: WITHOUT_MODULES= aac acpi_asus acpi_dock acpi_fujitsu acpi_hp \ and on and on... I do not want to put this long list in the make.conf because it makes that file a lot more complicated than

Re: How do I circumvent the use of clang during build?

2012-12-17 Thread Beeblebrox
have a look at /etc/src.conf and $ man src.cof you can set many buildworld options there. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-do-I-circumvent-the-use-of-clang-during-build-tp5769907p5770203.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at

burncd audio produces white noise

2006-05-16 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
My method has always been to use cdrecord with atapicam. cdrecord will accept .wav files and do the right thing on its own. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

Re: [OT] resolv.conf and dhclient

2006-06-05 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 6/5/06, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've often wondered why dhclient.conf doesn't have an 'ignore' directive. There's a 'require' in there; it doesn't seem like much of a stretch to 'ignore' something. Why not just write a simple script

Re: How can I know which files a proccess is accessing?

2006-06-08 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Note that problems with lsof are generally fixed by recompiling it. It doesn't take well to upgrades of the OS underneath it. On 6/7/06, Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:20:03AM -0700, pete wright wrote: On 6/6/06, Darren Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: NFS processes locking up!!

2006-06-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
[nfsd's and other processes locking in 'D' state] One thing I've seen cause this kind of thing is a disk that needs to be manually fsck'd. Try bringing up the system in single user and manually fsck'ing the volume. I have no idea what causes this kind of state --- where the disk is bad, but

Re: unmounting a filesystem safely that doesn't exist anymore

2006-06-13 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 6/12/06, Ulrich Spoerlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Björn König wrote: I did a mistake: I unplugged my digital camera accidentally before I unmounted the filesystem. *doh* This happens very often, because I'm very scatterbrained. =) The kernel will panic and all filesystems remain

Re: bridge.ko, sysctrl.conf and ifconfig_XXX_name, SCSI as a boot device

2006-06-20 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 6/19/06, Todor Dragnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, I will use if_bridge from now. Anyone have ideas about second problem? Maybe I must remove device usb from GENERIC config and recompile kernel ? This really is an FAQ. There are many ways. You can use the device.hintsfile to tie

Re: What is a good choice of sata-ii raid controller for freebsd?

2007-02-13 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
One thing I would like to see is a list of favoured non-raid multiport cards that are not dumb. We have a server running a rocket RAID controller (largely to get 8 ports of SATA). It doesn't do hot swap, it doesn't do SMART and I'm beginning to believe it might occasionally corrupt sectors

gvinum setstate missing?

2004-11-14 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I'm in the uncomfortable position of needing to setstate down a gvinum drive. I can't seem to effect this as the gvinum command doesn't understand setstate (even though it proclaims that it does in gvinum help). Is there a way of making this so? ___

gvinum again?

2004-11-14 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now... I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes, but does gvinum not (yet) load balance on reads?

Re: gvinum again?

2004-11-14 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers various load-balancing options). Is this something planned for the near future?

Re: status of ehci(4) in 5.3-stable?

2004-11-16 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:58:53 -0500, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 05:55 AM 16/11/2004, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: Hiho! :-) What is the current status of ehci(4) in 5.3-stable, i.e. what are my chances that if I buy cheap 3.5 external usb 2.0 case it will just or probably work?

Re: USB Flash reader under RELENG_6: force GEOM rescan

2006-02-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 2/9/06, Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about 'fdisk da0'? :) That's only bad when it actually decides to do something :). I have a usb drive that takes a while to become ready after being inserted. It initially generates errors when attempting to access it. Yours may have a

Re: USB Flash reader under RELENG_6: force GEOM rescan

2006-02-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 2/10/06, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Concerning the SCSI and CAM code I'm not an expert, but I think it should be possible to nudge devfs when a rescan has detected a new device. You'd think, but no. You see, the device , according to CAM, doesn't change. Magically, it has

Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-09 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
If you have a dual-em card in this server, you should get better performance putting your primary load out the em interface(s). In general, we've benched the em (and to a lesser extent, the fxp) interfaces as performing much better than other ethernets (especially bge). I have a bge on my laptop

Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 4/10/06, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: metoo I can't comment on gigabit performance but at Fast Ethernet speeds, I've found that fxp performs much better than dc, tl and tx NICs. I've had fairly bad experiences with bge under even moderate load (though the one in my laptop seems

Re: removing external usb hdd without unmounting causes reboot?

2007-07-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Nobody's said what the problem is. I'm not a filesystem code monkey, but IIRC, the problem is that the filesystem plays fast and loose with pointers and is too closely related to the VM. One solution is (as mentioned) a userland filesystem that doesn't panic. automount approximates this if you

Re: ZFS and NFS: changing handles between reboots

2009-03-30 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.comwrote: on any request to previously mounted FS. On UFS, mounted NFS file systems survive server reboots... Are you sure anout that ? I have a lot of systems sharing files using UFS and I see the 'stale NFS file handle'

Re: 32bit filesystem limitations

2009-04-01 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Andrei Kolu an...@bsd.ee wrote: I forgot to try ZFS on that particular server- maybe that one would be better alternative? I have experience with ZFS on terabyte sized volumes and had no ill effects so far- what about really large filesystems? I know that ZFS

Re: Evaluating the performance of a single FreeBSD server

2009-04-23 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Michel Di Croci michel.dicr...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, One of my ex colleague wanna startup a web project. I'm still unsure about [...] However what I want to know here is how much could handle this server as a standalone? How many requests at the same time

Re: mountd doean`t start when ZFS is enabled.

2009-05-19 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
2009/5/18 Михаил Кипа msnk...@mail.ru I have two servers with Identical FreeBSD7.2 system. On both I have such config in /etc/rc.conf: rpcbind_enable=YES rpc_lockd_enable=YES rpc_statd_enable=YES nfs_client_enable=YES nfs_server_enable=YES nfs_server_flags=-u -t -n 5 -h 192.168.x.y

Re: ZFS NAS configuration question

2009-06-02 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 31/05/2009, at 4:41 AM, Dan Naumov wrote: To top that off, even when/if you do it right, not your entire disk goes to ZFS anyway, because you still do need a swap and a /boot to be non-ZFS, so you will have to

Changes in the routing socket datagram between 7.0 and 7.2?

2009-06-15 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Did we change something in the routing socket's datagram between 7.0 and 7.2? I have a binary I compiled on 7.0-RELEASE and it fails to add a route on 7.2. If I recompile the source on 7.2, it works. Roughly put, the code make a datagram for the route socket like this: bzero(rtmsg,

Re: What happened to DVD writing?

2009-09-20 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: Recording data DVDs worked a few weeks/months ago on this system with a PATA Lite-On DVD recorder: FreeBSD lightning 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Sun Sep 20 07:25:58 MDT 2009

Re: What happened to DVD writing?

2009-09-20 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Richard Mahlerwein mahle...@yahoo.comwrote: I have had several exhibit behavior even more odd. The most unusual was this particular CD writer... It read both DVDs and CDs but would write neither (it had worked fine the week before). I took it out of the

Re: fusefs-ntfs makes fatal trap/page fault in FreeBSD-7.0

2008-02-04 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Feb 4, 2008 10:31 PM, Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble mounting external NTFS hard drive using fusefs-ntfs port on Dell Latitude D620. I havn't seen this specific problem, but on my Dell XPS 1730 (core-2-duo-extreme) The NTFS-3g mounts doen't seem to shutdown properly.

Re: kevent on UDP sockets

2008-02-07 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Feb 7, 2008 1:54 PM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble with kevent() in connection with UDP sockets (6.2-STABLE). Registering an event seems to work, but when UDP packet arrives on the socket, kevent returns with 0. Is there currently a working support for UDP sockets

Re:more than 4gb of RAM (configurations)

2008-02-20 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Feb 19, 2008 5:10 PM, Kevin K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386 FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb. Siding with most of the group (go amd64), I'll add my own comment: Using PAE to access 4G of RAM (because 4G shows up as

uchcom MFC?

2008-02-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Now that 7.0 has been cut, any chance that the uchcom driver could be MFC'd? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PAUSE support for Ethernet interfaces ?

2008-03-03 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Bruce M. Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are switch ASICs out there which implement upstream bandwidth limiting on ports by sending the PAUSE frame. I believe thompsa@ recently committed a fix to if_bridge to allow it to ignore PAUSE frames for the

Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice?

2008-04-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, freebsd-stable. Does somebody use some software RAID5 on FreeBSD in real production system? I want to build storage server for my home: RAW photos, multi-layer PhotoShop files and FLAC-encoded music consume

Re: Dreadful gmirror performance, though each half works fine

2008-04-17 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to run a system with a pair of drives mirrored under gmirror, one of thhem being local and the other remote using ggated. I have experimented with this rather extensively and have operationally decided not to

Re: Dreadful gmirror performance, though each half works fine

2008-04-17 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have experimented with this rather extensively and have operationally decided not to use ggated in combination with gmirror --- it doesn't appear to work as well as one might expect. Ah, thats unmfortunate :-( I

Re: Dreadful gmirror performance, though each half works fine

2008-04-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the end we found that ggate was crashy after a week or two of heavy use, too... dispite it's performance problems (which can be somewhat fixed by telling gmirror to only read from the local disk) That last part

Re: Dreadful gmirror performance, though each half works fine

2008-04-22 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete French wrote: I did some benchmarking, and load gives me a bit better performance than round-robin so I've elected to use that. Haven't tried prefer as syncing all the drives backwards and forwards to get the

Re: Status of ZFS in -stable?

2008-05-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Marc UBM Bocklet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:26:49 -0400 Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more stable now?

Re: Status of ZFS in -stable?

2008-05-20 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 20, 2008 12:08 pm Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 18 May Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: However, when using Norton Ghost to make backup snapshots, the files (on ZFS) come out corrupt. They are not corrupt on UFS backed

Re: ZFS on root and disk write caching.

2008-05-24 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Andrew Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but what struck me as odd is the desire to create two separate zpools - one for data storage and one for the system. i think one of zfs's greatest strengths is the abstraction/separation between disks and filesystems.

Re: MCP55 SATA data corruption in FreeBSD 7

2008-07-03 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Daniel Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having problems with silent data corruption on (some) drives connected to an MCP55 SATA controller. I have an MCP55 controller here running most of my RAID array. When I origionally loaded this machine, I had

Re: IPMI and Dell ERA/O

2008-08-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I have a 1950-III 1U on the floor here that I'm loading. After configuring IPMI in the BIOS, I can: [2:6:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ipmitool -I lanplus -U root -H 192.168.221.160 shell Password: ipmitool power on Chassis Power Control: Up/On Now. strike is not the 1U in question... and does not, in

Re: IPMI and Dell ERA/O

2008-08-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Bob Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only problem I have seen on em is that by default the driver resets the phy during boot which confuses IPMI; if a SOL console session is active, the driver is signalled not to do the reset. Same here. The 1950-III

Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY

2008-09-28 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Derek Kuliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ZFS is the first filesystem, to my knowledge, which provides 1) a reliable filesystem, 2) detection of filesystem problems in real-time or during scrubbing, 3) repair of problems in real-time (assuming raidz1 or

Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY

2008-09-28 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:30:01PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: However, as a core general purpose filesystem, it seems to have flaws, not the least of which is a re-separation of file cache and memory cache

Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY

2008-09-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, as a core general purpose filesystem, it seems to have flaws, not the least of which is a re-separation of file cache and memory cache. For me, this doesn't matter because ZFS is so much faster than UFS overall.

Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY

2008-09-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I certainly can't agree with this. I don't think you're measuring the performance of the machine --- only measuring the performance of the filesystem. When ZFS is active, memory is committed in the kernel to ZFS

Re: constant zfs data corruption

2008-10-20 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:18:01PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote: On Monday 20 October 2008 15:03:14 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Hm... I thought we determined earlier in this

zpool crash.

2008-11-06 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Someone posted something like this earlier... [3:6:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/u/dgilbert zpool attach canoe ad8s4d ad4s3d Assertion failed: (èQ), function rv == 0, file /canoe/64/usr/src/cddl/sbin/zpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool_vdev.c, line 131. Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) ...

Re: tcpdump(1) filter by date

2008-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I don't know whether or not this has been fixed, but I found that I had to recompile tcpslice and/or tcpdump to deal with files larger than 4 gig (or maybe 2 gig). I suppose it's a better situation than wireshark. After a few million packets, it falls over because it makes the widgets in the

MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-21 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed. So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us, when is it intended that ZFS

Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-21 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul B. Mahol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/22/08, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other chatter about

SATA CD fail.

2008-12-04 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I've got an HP DL-360 1U here that has a slim SATA CDROM. I've (so far) tried booting FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE and FreeBSD-7.1-BETA2. I've tried both rewritable media (my first choice) and write-once media. The kernel loads fine, but multiuser fails with acd0: TIMEOUT - READ_BIG retrying ... twice,

Re: NIC for VLAN

2009-01-07 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Edvaldo Silva e...@americanadigital.com.brwrote: Hello, guys! Please, can someone point a NIC, PCI 2.2 specs, full VLAN capable under FreeBSD? I´m finding terrible issues using RTL8169 and 3C9x, almost all for the fact NIC cannot handle MTU a little bigger

FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I have a dell 1950 here on the floor. Since 1950 seems to refer to a lot of things with a lot of configurations, I'm going to attempt to narrow that down a bit. It's got 2x 2.33Ghz dual core pentiums (stepping 06-0F-6 according to the bios) in it and it has an SAS RAID card that FreeBSD

FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: does not respond device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6

Re: FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-13 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Richard Tector richardtec...@thekeelecentre.com wrote: Can you try with 7.0 (should be available on ftp-archive)? I can confirm that 7.0 exhibits the same behaviour (and is incidentally very chatty about probing the raid controller) I have a 1950 from Sept

Re: FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-22 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: This 1950 may predate that a bit, but I'm not sure how to nail it down exactly, other than by it's hardware components. Anyways, 7.0 does the same thing --- still wedged. I haven't seen anyone recommend

Re: FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-22 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: This 1950 may predate that a bit, but I'm not sure how to nail it down exactly, other than by it's hardware components. Anyways

Re: FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-24 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: This 1950 may predate that a bit, but I'm not sure

Quggaa locking hard.

2009-12-03 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I'm still investigating this, but my quagga is locking hard on FreeBSD 8.0 and not locking hard on 7.2. It seems (at this early point in the investigation) that both bgpd and zebra are wedging and zebra is listed as being in the RUN state. curiously, the load is also 4.0 (exactly the number of

Re: Quggaa locking hard.

2009-12-05 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: At 04:07 PM 12/4/2009, K. Macy wrote: If you have a large number of routes then you will want to disable the flowtable. Thanks! I will remove from boxes that act as routers / large firewalls. However, the high load avg is

Re: USB GPS mouse in Wine

2009-12-13 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.auwrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Pim Bliek wrote: Anyone any suggestions on this issue? I did a lot of Google... but did not find anything usefull beyond this point. Seems this works on Linux with Wine, but no clues for

Re: ZFS pool upgrade to v14 broke ZFS booting

2010-01-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Xin LI delp...@delphij.net wrote: On 2010/01/27 11:18, Paul Mather wrote: I have a FreeBSD guest running under VirtualBox 3.1.2 on Mac OS X.  It's running a recent 8-STABLE and is a ZFS-only install booting via gptzfsboot.   I use this VirtualBox guest as a

Re: Extending your zfs pool with multiple devices

2010-09-02 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
[regarding getting more disks in a machine] On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote: You need an HP SAS expander card in the new box, and an HBA in your primary box with external ports to hook it into. Then the drives in the other box will show up as local drives on

Re: Extending your zfs pool with multiple devices

2010-09-02 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:56:04PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: With 1.5T disks, I find that the 4 to 1 multipliers have a small effect on speed.  The 4 drives I have on the multipler are saturated at 100

Re: FreeBSD 7 installs where FreeBSD 8 wont due to CD

2010-12-07 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com wrote: I am not burning a CD or using any physical media. I am booting directly off the image file using iLO. Hence the stuff in that thread doesnt apply. It's defintely 8 specific - I can boot an mage from 7 it works

Re: 8.1 amd64 lockup (maybe zfs or disk related)

2011-02-07 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote: Given that you're running 8.1-RELEASE, what sort of ZFS tunings are you using in /boot/loader.conf?  Tuning is required on this version I haven't seen any new tuning recommendations. Has the tuning required on an

Intel em driver sleeps with non-sleepable lock.

2011-05-05 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
The motherboard in question is made by Intel and contains a Xeon 3440 (4 core x 2 HT per core). 16 Gig of RAM is installed and we are installing the 64 bit FreeBSD 8.2 using the PC-BSD installer (to install zfs root faster). The motherboard has 4 igb ethernet and one em ethernet. The em

Re: Intel em driver sleeps with non-sleepable lock.

2011-05-07 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: So, this happens EVERY time after an install of 8.2 ?? Give me details about the hardware please. Having had more time to experiment, it seems it happens whenever ifconfig_em0=DHCP is in rc.conf --- which happens after using

Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

2012-02-22 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
It could do some good to think of the scale of the problem and maybe the driver can tune to the hardware. First, is 8k packet buffers a reasonable default on a GigE port? Well... on a GigE port, you could have from 100k pps (packets per second) at 1500 bytes to 500k pps at around 300 bytes to

9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.

2012-11-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on it. The motherboard in question is the S3420GPRX and the IGB's show up as: igb0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 port 0x3020-0x303f mem 0xb1b2-0xb1b3,0xb1bc4000-0xb1bc7fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci3

Re: 9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.

2012-11-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
A further update to my problem: it only seems to occur when there is largely traffic out ie: the window is active with ... but typing in the window seems to prevent the effect. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.

2012-11-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
To Jack Vogel's comment, this problem only seems to occur on systems that are exceedingly lightly loaded (in this case, not yet in production and I'm the only one using it). On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote: r243570 in CURRENT should likely fix this

Re: 9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.

2012-11-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote: Are you using pf ? Also, did you confirm it is the igb nic and not something more general ? e.g. if you put in a different nic, does the problem go away ? No pf, the motherboard em-driver NIC does not have this problem. In

Re: multiple NFS mounts with bg,retrycount=0

2013-05-06 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
[about double background NFS mounts] I'm not sure on the fix to this, but I'm pretty sure it's because we retry the mount -a stuff twice at startup. If you watch your console, you'll see two places where it will mount NFS filesystems during boot. ... well... a fix to this would be to _not_ do

gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

2013-08-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
So I have a system running: FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55 EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386 and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep this post short, the crash.txt is here.

Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

2013-08-30 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
- crash - single user - fsck - fsck again -\ ^-/ On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: So I have a system

Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

2013-08-30 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com w dniu 29 sie 2013, o godz. 23:35: So I have a system running: FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55 EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386 and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep

Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

2013-08-30 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
at it, gmirror is dropping the same error and the underlying hardware is not causing the error... On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote: My bad. New link for the core.txt.4: https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=filest

  1   2   >