Re: CFT: Re: linux libusb again, I made an updated port...

2014-02-11 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:11:09AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:06:27AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > > On 10 Feb 2014, at 04:18 , Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > > > > On nie, lut 09, 2014 at 02:59:06 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > &

Re: CFT: Re: linux libusb again, I made an updated port...

2014-02-09 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On nie, lut 09, 2014 at 02:59:06 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:56:24AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > On sob, lut 08, 2014 at 09:45:46 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:49:28PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > &

Re: linux libusb again, I made an updated port...

2014-02-08 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On sob, lut 08, 2014 at 09:45:46 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:49:28PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > On pi??, lut 07, 2014 at 09:12:08 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > This came up on irc so I tried to build

Re: linux libusb again, I made an updated port...

2014-02-07 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
ied it with Linux'ish lsusb(1) and USB-based FPGA JTAG programmer, for which this stuff was written. Can you show the diff between USB code from src/lib and from the distfile? Instead of having a port with .c code, I'd drive towards having src/lib changes (if any) be commited. An

Re: usb/173666: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and FreeBSD

2012-12-18 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
The following reply was made to PR usb/173666; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/173666: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and Fr

Re: usb/173666: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and FreeBSD

2012-12-18 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 16 November 2012 23:47:29 Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > >Number: 173666 > > >Category: usb > > >Synopsis: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different betw

usb/173666: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and FreeBSD

2012-11-16 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
>Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Nov 16 22:50:00 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Wojciech A. Koszek >Release:9.0-RELEASE >Organization: FreeBSD >E

usb/90670: [PATCH] Flag NO_GETMAXLUN in USB quirks has no effect

2005-12-19 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
>Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Dec 20 00:10:01 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Wojciech A. Koszek >Release:FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 >Organization: >Environment: Syst

Re: usb/89889: [QUIRK] Motorola E398 Mobile Phone (TransFlash drive)

2005-12-04 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
The following reply was made to PR usb/89889; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: usb/89889: [QUIRK] Motorola E398 Mobile Phone (TransFlash drive) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:34:

Re: usb/89889: [QUIRK] Motorola E398 Mobile Phone (TransFlash drive)

2005-12-04 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
Hello, I've updated version of the patch: http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/diff.1.e398 This patch includes: - manual page change (updated to note that E398 is supported) - PR number in comment - "TransFlash memory card" Comments are welcome! -- * Wojciech A. K

usb/89889: [QUIRK] Motorola E398 Mobile Phone (TransFlash drive)

2005-12-03 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
>Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 03 18:40:02 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Wojciech A. Koszek >Release:FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 >Organization: >Environment: Sys