On nie, lut 09, 2014 at 02:59:06 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:56:24AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > On sob, lut 08, 2014 at 09:45:46 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:49:28PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > > > On pi??, lut 07, 2014 at 09:12:08 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > This came up on irc so I tried to build a linux libusb port (before > > > > > I learned about ports/146895), mine uses linux_base-gentoo-stage3 > > > > > like linux_kdump with a src/lib/libusb head snapshot so it's more > > > > > up to date than wkoszek's build (ports/146895), and it's really > > > > > easy to update it again. Also maybe it can be used as linux > > > > > libusb-1.0.so too; I didn't actually test it tho. > > > > > > > > > > Should this be committed? Is wkoszek's version better since it > > > > > also builds on < 10.x? Comments welcome... > > > > > > > > > > wkoszek's version: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146895 > > > > > > > > > > Mine: > > > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/linux_libusb.shar > > > > > > > > > > Distfile: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/distfiles/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.tar.bz2 > > > > > > > > > > 10/amd64 package: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/packages/10amd64/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.txz > > > > > > > > > > (built via: > > > > > > > > > > poudriere bulk -v -j 10amd64 -p custom devel/linux_libusb > > > > > > > > > > - btw for some reason the dependency > > > > > emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 > > > > > doesn't build for 10i386 in poudriere bulk, I get a pkg segfault. > > > > > bapt > > > > > Cc'd...) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Juergen, > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > What would be the reason for this update? > > > > > > > > My stuff may be out of date, but it was all tested and working. I > > > > verified > > > > it with Linux'ish lsusb(1) and USB-based FPGA JTAG programmer, for which > > > > this stuff was written. > > > > > > > I was just thinking an updated version may be useful, but if it's > > > already working for everyone maybe less so... > > > > > > Or would it work as a linux libusb-1.0.so too? I know the libusb 1.0 > > > stuff added some functions since 9.x at least... maybe hps would know > > > (Cc'd.) > > > > > > > Juergen, > > > > I think this package is useful and is looking for maintainer, so if you have > > time and energy, I'm OK with upgrading it, but I suggest testing it first. > > Bjoern might be interested too. > > > You mean bz@ ? Cc'd. I tried testing lsusb from debian sid but it printed > nothing, neither with my nor with your older version, but maybe it's just > `too new' for our current linuxolator.
I assume you have at least 1 USB device while trying this. I don't remember exactly, but while trying within Linuxolator, you may need devfs/procfs to be mounted under Linuxolator's root directory. So you'll have to figure this out. Does it return with 0 exit code? If not, lsusb should be simple enough to let you place printf() all over the place and understand out when it's failing. -- Wojciech A. Koszek wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"