On pią, lut 07, 2014 at 09:12:08 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > Hi! > > This came up on irc so I tried to build a linux libusb port (before > I learned about ports/146895), mine uses linux_base-gentoo-stage3 > like linux_kdump with a src/lib/libusb head snapshot so it's more > up to date than wkoszek's build (ports/146895), and it's really > easy to update it again. Also maybe it can be used as linux > libusb-1.0.so too; I didn't actually test it tho. > > Should this be committed? Is wkoszek's version better since it > also builds on < 10.x? Comments welcome... > > wkoszek's version: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146895 > > Mine: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/linux_libusb.shar > > Distfile: > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/distfiles/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.tar.bz2 > > 10/amd64 package: > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/packages/10amd64/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.txz > > (built via: > > poudriere bulk -v -j 10amd64 -p custom devel/linux_libusb > > - btw for some reason the dependency emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 > doesn't build for 10i386 in poudriere bulk, I get a pkg segfault. bapt > Cc'd...) >
Juergen, What would be the reason for this update? My stuff may be out of date, but it was all tested and working. I verified it with Linux'ish lsusb(1) and USB-based FPGA JTAG programmer, for which this stuff was written. Can you show the diff between USB code from src/lib and from the distfile? Instead of having a port with .c code, I'd drive towards having src/lib changes (if any) be commited. And then that port only has to do: cp -rf src/lib/libusb port/tmp/dir and build it with different -DDEFINES if necessary. Thanks, -- Wojciech A. Koszek wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/ _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"