Re: bhyve: is SIGTERM ACPI shutdown supported on linux guests?

That did it. Thank you! ronald On 03/11/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Grehan wrote: I'm on 10.2-RELEASE. sending SIGTERM to a FreeBSD guest bhyve shuts it down as expected, but my CentOS 6 guest does nothing. Is this expected to work? It isn't enabled by default on centos6. You'll have to do

Re: bhyve: is SIGTERM ACPI shutdown supported on linux guests?

I'm on 10.2-RELEASE. sending SIGTERM to a FreeBSD guest bhyve shuts it down as expected, but my CentOS 6 guest does nothing. Is this expected to work? It isn't enabled by default on centos6. You'll have to do something like this in your guest: yum -y install acpid chkconfig acpid

bhyve: is SIGTERM ACPI shutdown supported on linux guests?

Hi, I'm on 10.2-RELEASE. sending SIGTERM to a FreeBSD guest bhyve shuts it down as expected, but my CentOS 6 guest does nothing. Is this expected to work? thanks ronald ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Сергей Мамонов wrote: Hello! Yes - zvols looks awesome. But what driver you use for it? virtio-blk. And what about disk usage overhead in guest? ufs on zvol is faster, either in the parent or a bhyve using virtio-blk, than zfs. at least for writing, which is my dominant work load. i

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Hello! Yes - zvols looks awesome. But what driver you use for it? And what about disk usage overhead in guest? virtio-blk doesnt support fstrim (ahci-hd support it, but slower? "*At this point virtio-blk is indeed faster then ahci-hd on high IOPS*"). In linux && kvm we try used virtio-scsi driver

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Pavel Odintsov wrote: Hello, Dear Community! I would like to ask about plans for this storage engine approach. I like ZFS so much and we are storing about half petabyte of data here. But when we are speaking about vm's we should use zvols or even raw file based images and they are discarding

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Jakub Klama wrote on 03/11/2016 00:13: Wiadomość napisana przez Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> w dniu 10.03.2016, o godz. 23:30: Pavel Odintsov wrote on 03/10/2016 23:24: Hello! Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs state in FreeBSD and their protocol

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

> Wiadomość napisana przez Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> w dniu > 10.03.2016, o godz. 23:30: > > Pavel Odintsov wrote on 03/10/2016 23:24: >> Hello! >> >> Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs >> state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead. >> >> Coukd

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Pavel Odintsov wrote on 03/10/2016 23:24: Hello! Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead. Coukd you aim me to more details? You can find something at https://github.com/wca/p9fs On Friday, 11 March 2016, Peter

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

>Coukd you aim me to more details? I believe Jakub was working on this. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2016-February/004102.html Here's the GitHub Branch: https://github.com/jceel/freebsd/tree/virtfs Here's the diff:

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Hello! Songs interesting! But I could not find any information regarding p9fs state in FreeBSD and their protocol overhead. Coukd you aim me to more details? Thanks! On Friday, 11 March 2016, Peter Grehan wrote: > As we have support for ZFS on almost all platforms (I'm

Re: ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

As we have support for ZFS on almost all platforms (I'm speaking about Linux and FreeBSD) we could run ZFS subvolumes inside vm's without so much pain. So this approach looks very promising and I would like to talk about it ;) To be clear on this: do you mean something like ZFS DMU passthru

ZFS subvolume support inside Bhyve vm

Hello, Dear Community! I would like to ask about plans for this storage engine approach. I like ZFS so much and we are storing about half petabyte of data here. But when we are speaking about vm's we should use zvols or even raw file based images and they are discarding all ZFS benefits. We

ports/Xen on CURRENT, error: ELF start or entries are out of bounds.

Hi all. I'm trying to run XEN on latest current as dom0. Did all by manual: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0 (except compiling from git, cant compile tools, so just used ports xen/xen-tools/xen-kernel) And stuck with such an error: --- (XEN) elf_xen_addr_calc_check: ERROR: ELF start or