https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225558
--- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: rgrimes
Date: Mon Feb 12 19:08:17 UTC 2018
New revision: 329179
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/329179
Log:
MFC: r328695,r328720,r32878
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-virtualization@Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225791
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-virtualization@Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215972
--- Comment #37 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: avg
Date: Thu Feb 15 17:09:48 UTC 2018
New revision: 329320
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/329320
Log:
MFC r328622: vmm/svm: post LAPI
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215972
--- Comment #38 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: avg
Date: Thu Feb 15 17:10:42 UTC 2018
New revision: 329321
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/329321
Log:
MFC r328622: vmm/svm: post LAPI
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215972
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Progres
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21
Mateusz Piotrowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpp...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
Jeremy Chadwick changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@koitsu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #5 from david.boy...@twc.com ---
Based on Jeremy's assessment, I looked for revisions from 4 weeks ago that were
MFC'd this week. I came up with r327996 which was MFC'd to 11.1-STABLE as
r329316.
I built 11.1-STABLE as of r3293
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #6 from Andriy Gapon ---
Could you please run this command after attaching the device and before running
the gpart command?
# camcontrol debug -c -p -I -P 3:0:0
Where 3:0:0 is taken from bus, target, lun reported by camcontrol d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #7 from david.boy...@twc.com ---
Created attachment 190827
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190827&action=edit
Output of gpart show da0 after camcontrol debug -c -p -I -P 3:0:0
Output of gpart show da0 a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #8 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to David.Boyd49 from comment #7)
This is valuable information, thank you!
Could you please install sg3_utils package?
And then run the following commands (after attaching the USB device):
sg_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #9 from Andriy Gapon ---
And for completeness:
sg_modes -a -v /dev/pass2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-virtualization@free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #10 from david.boy...@twc.com ---
Created attachment 190845
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190845&action=edit
Output of sg3_utils commands
I ran the commands requested. The output looks truncated by er
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #11 from david.boy...@twc.com ---
Created attachment 190847
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190847&action=edit
Output of sg3_utils commands on CentOS EL 7.1708 host
The VirtualBox host is CentOS EL 7.17
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #12 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to David.Boyd49 from comment #10)
Are you sure that you used the correct pass device?
You used pass3 while previously the USB device had pass2.
Just double-checking... It's very strange that
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #13 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to David.Boyd49 from comment #11)
The host results look good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #14 from david.boy...@twc.com ---
Created attachment 190860
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190860&action=edit
Verify camcontrol devlist output for pass3 device
Andriy,
I verified pass3 as the USB devi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #15 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to David.Boyd49 from comment #14)
Perhaps the device genuinely does not support INQUIRY command...
Maybe camcontrol would be a better option in this case.
Could you please try this?
# camcon
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsd-...@freebsd.org
A
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-virtualization@Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142
Peter Grehan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225588
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |freebsd-virtualization@Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142
--- Comment #2 from Dave Cottlehuber ---
Thanks Peter! giving it a whirl now;
https://github.com/skunkwerks/freebsd/commit/e1f1fbb91c80d7f60801e2487c3e8761d61f7864
for a git-friendly branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21
--- Comment #19 from mainl...@apeiron.net ---
I've attached a patch that fixes this regression in bug #213155.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebs
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225588
--- Comment #4 from Jason W. Bacon ---
I'm not seeing this issue with CentOS in 5.2.8. A Debian install that failed
under 5.2.6 also worked under 5.2.8.
My Windows 10 guest still doesn't work, but that may be due to permanent damage
cause
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-virtualization@Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225588
w.schwarzenf...@utanet.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w.schwarzenf...@utanet.a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218731
--- Comment #17 from Dexuan Cui ---
(In reply to ds from comment #16)
I highly suspect this bug can be fixed by the attached patch in comment #2 of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583, but I don't have a
physical disk o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
--- Comment #3 from Dexuan Cui ---
Posted a patch for review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14690
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-virtualizat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
--- Comment #4 from Dexuan Cui ---
(In reply to Dexuan Cui from comment #3)
I manually tested the patch with releng/{10.3, 10.4, 11.0, 11.1}, stable/{10,
11), and master on local Windows Server 2012 R2, 2016 and Azure, and I don't
hit any r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Preetpal Sohal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||preetpal.so...@gmail.com
--- Comm
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225588
--- Comment #6 from Jason W. Bacon ---
Interesting...
I spoke too soon about 5.2.8 solving the problem. The latest round of CentOS
Yum updates triggered it again.
I restored the .vdi file using an OVA snapshot and reran updates + zeroing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Dexuan Cui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
--
You are recei
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176694
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||uefi
Assignee|freebsd-b..
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176694
--- Comment #5 from David NewHamlet ---
Fixed in: FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-amd64-20180329-r331740-disc1.iso
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-virt
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176694
Kyle Evans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-virtualization@Free |kev...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176694
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsd-virtualization@Free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
P Kern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||des.gauf...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #8 from P Kern ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #7)
Sigh. I should have rtfm: just noticed vmx(8) does _not_ mention
supporting jumbo frames. Never mind. P Kern.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #9 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #8)
*offtopic, vmxnet3 specific only, nothing PR related in this comment*:
It's correct that if_vmx(4) does not mention MTU or "jumbo" frames, but I was
quiet su
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #10 from P Kern ---
(In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #9)
Thanks for the code! Yes vmx(8) does support recv/xmit of 9k frames
but in a case where the VM has 2 vmx(8) NICs, the 9k frames do not seem to
be able to tr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #12 from P Kern ---
(In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #11)
[ doh! vmx(4)/em(4) -- not ..(8)! sigh, brain rot. ]
yup, I was suspecting vmx(_4_) was doing something like that.
With our limited resources, our options for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #13 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #12)
In case you end up switching from "vmxnet3"/[vmx(4)|vmx3f(4)] to
"e1000"/[em(4)], depending on your workload, you can save lots of overhead if
you switch to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #14 from P Kern ---
(In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #13)
> Happy to share the rc(8) script on request.
yup, "request" please. thx.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #15 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #14)
Sorry for so much nonsense and off-topic comments; But to correct myself in
case anybody else wonders
You do _not_ need the driver reload hack for the
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
--- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dexuan
Date: Tue Apr 10 18:05:03 UTC 2018
New revision: 332385
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332385
Log:
hyperv/storvsc: storvsc_io_do
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142
Dave Cottlehuber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227558
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|virtualizat...@freebsd.org
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212820
John Baldwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #30 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212820
--- Comment #31 from Dexuan Cui ---
(In reply to John Baldwin from comment #30)
This is a bug opened 1.5 years ago. We have made a lot of fixes to the storage
driver since then, and we also improved the support of Hyper-V Generation-2
FreeB
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227558
Peter Grehan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227558
--- Comment #3 from Domagoj Stolfa ---
(In reply to Peter Grehan from comment #2)
Hi Peter:
The revision this was tested on was r332573.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227558
--- Comment #4 from Domagoj Stolfa ---
(In reply to Domagoj Stolfa from comment #3)
Thinking about this more, it is possible that this is a side-effect of a race
in NFS (as this system is booted over NFS).
It's possible that mkstemp(s)() g
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
--- Comment #7 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dexuan
Date: Tue Apr 24 03:06:05 UTC 2018
New revision: 332903
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332903
Log:
MFC: 332385
r332385:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
--- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dexuan
Date: Tue Apr 24 03:07:49 UTC 2018
New revision: 332904
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332904
Log:
MFC: 332385
r332385:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Dexuan Cui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|virtualizat...@freebsd.org |dex...@freebsd.org
Fl
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|virtualizat...@freebsd.org
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Peter Grehan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ema...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #3 from Ed Maste ---
On my desktop at r333113 plus my WIP:
# kldstat -m vmm
Id Refs Name
5141 vmm
# kldstat -n vmm
Id Refs AddressSize Name
121 0x832ee000 53a160 vmm.ko
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Anish Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||an...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|`kldstat -m` does not work |`kldstat -m`
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #5 from Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> ---
Machine 1
=
* Laptop (Yoga 3 14)
* FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r332889
* Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5200U CPU @ 2.20GHz
Everything works as expected.
Machine 2
=
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer ---
I can't explain the fdc driver bug -- that seems unrelated -- but this is the
expected outcome of the vmm.ko *file* containing several modules: vmm, ppt, and
ivhd, and only one of them failing to load (v
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer ---
The usual thing to do here is to split vmm.ko into three separate .ko's. I
don't know the history here of why are one file. Possibly just convenience.
If they share significant code, maybe space savin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #6)
To clarify, there is a distinction between a *module* which is something
declared by (sometimes DRIVER_MODULE ->) DECLARE_MODULE -> MODULE_METADATA, and
a loada
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #9 from Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #8)
On the system that demonstrates the reported bug:
# kldunload vmm
# kldload ppt
kldload: can't load ppt: No such file or d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #10 from Rodney W. Grimes ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #8)
Thank you for that insight on kernel modules, I was not aware that we could
have multiple modules in a single file. That helps clarify some things, and
a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #11 from Peter Grehan ---
This is a bit of a lose-lose situation :( ppt was a separate kld at one point
but caused even more problems with it not being loaded, having to deal with
separate loads/unloads etc, so it was moved back
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #12 from Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #10)
Fragments of /var/log/messages from the FreeBSD guest:
CPU: AMD Opteron 63xx class CPU (4027.12-MHz K8-class CPU)
Orig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
--- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer ---
(In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #13)
Yeah, it's a nested hypervisor situation. That was covered in comment #5.
Does not change the fact that vmm.ko load failure results in the half-loaded
s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227956
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|virtualizat...@freebsd.org
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227956
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227956
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.1-STABLE |CURRENT
--
You are receiving t
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215972
Adam Jimerson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vend...@gmail.com
--- Comment #39
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215972
Anish Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||an...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #40 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168298
--- Comment #9 from rozhuk...@gmail.com ---
May be add info about AIO tunings to post install message and close this bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227880
Ryan Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rst...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #15 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168298
--- Comment #10 from rozhuk...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 193335
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=193335&action=edit
update postinstall message
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168298
--- Comment #11 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: pi
Date: Sat May 12 17:11:34 UTC 2018
New revision: 469742
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/469742
Log:
emulators/virtualbox-ose: add p
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168298
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.3-STABLE |11.1-RELEASE
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168298
--- Comment #12 from Kurt Jaeger ---
Sorry, I forgot to mention the reviews in the commit message. Now we should
probably keep this PR open until some finds a root cause and some safe lower
bounds for those values ?
--
You are receiving t
801 - 900 of 2669 matches
Mail list logo
