Hello,
For anyone interested I have submitted a PR to update the version of vm-bhyve
in the ports tree.
Primarily this fixes the off-putting, but completely benign error printed when
users run 'vm init' (the very first thing to run...)
I've no idea if I've got the diff format right though.
> Hello!
> not workink bhyve and windows please help me:
> bhyve
> -c 2
> -s 0,hostbridge
> -s 3,ahci-hd,/images/win.img
> -s 4,ahci-cd,/images/win_repack.iso
> -s 10,virtio-net,tap0
> -s 31,lpc
> -l com1,/dev/nmdm0A
> -l com2,/dev/nmdm1A
> -l bootrom,/path/to/BHYVE_UEFI.fd
> -m 2G -H
> Hi,
>> ..
> /pci@0,0/pci8086,2821@4/disk@0,0 (sd1) online
> NOTICE: vioif0: Got MAC address from host: e4:94:1:0:ff:ff
> pseudo-device: tun0
> tun0 is /pseudo/tun@0
> pseudo-device: lx_systrace0
> lx_systrace0 is /pseudo/lx_systrace@0
>
> panic[cpu0]/thread=ff0002566c40: BAD
>> -s 0,hostbridge
> Things should work if you leave out the hostbridge. The PCIe
> capability that is tacked on to this will make Illumos use MSI/MSIx for
> the virtio adapter which apparently hits a bug in the driver. Without
> it, the virtio driver will fall back to legacy interrupts. This
>Hi,
>Please see inline.
>On Oct 13, 2015, at 7:17 AM, Matt Churchyard via freebsd-virtualization
><freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> wrote:
> In my quest to continue expanding guest support in my vm-bhyve utility (See
> https://github.com/churchers/vm-bhyve :) )
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:10:44PM -0700, Marcus Reid wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:25:52PM -0400, Vick Khera wrote:
Opinions? Preferably well-reasoned ones. :)
However, having the ARC eating up lots of memory twice seems pretty
bletcherous. You can probably do some tuning to
As I understand it
1) shutdown from guest
2) 'kill ' -> pressing the power button once.
3) --force-poweroff -> holding power button in
4) --force-reset -> pressing the reset button
5) bhyvectl --destroy -> same as 3? (although vmm is destroyed as well)
1 or 2 are obviously preferred. I've found
> [..]
>
> You just need the vm name (win) on the end:
>
> # bhyve [options] vm-name
>
>Sorry, I was being stupid. With the vm name on the end, it just exits with
>error code 1 and without printing anytning.
>I have recompiled bhyve itself and the libvmmapi, maybe it's not enough? The
(sent this to the wrong list...)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Churchyard
Sent: 04 August 2016 12:57
To: 'Michael Reifenberger'
Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Bhyve tests and findings
>Hi,
>after waiting for UEFI-GOP and using bhyve (with vm-bhyve as a convenient
>tool) an a
Colleagues,
>I like bhyve very much, and have sucessfully run FreeBSD and Ubuntu
>16.04 server in FreeBSD 10.3 bhyve, with vm-bhyve as a shell.
>Now I am trying to boot Windows 7 but have not succeeded so far.
>However there are things I don't quite understand. A couple of questions, if
>you
>
> uefi="yes"
> graphics="yes"
> Dear Colleagues,
> Can I enjoy and test all those nice "UEFI-GOP" features on a 10.3-RELEASE
> system, or do I have to install CURRENT for that?
I believe you should also be able to use the 11 beta.
Matt
___
> > > > > >
> > > > > > uefi="yes"
> > > > > > graphics="yes"
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Colleagues,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I enjoy and test all those nice "UEFI-GOP" features on a
> > > > > 10.3-RELEASE system, or do I have to install CURRENT for that?
> > > >
> > > > AFAIK you can checkout
>Lars Engels wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > uefi="yes"
> > > > > graphics="yes"
> > > >
> > > > Dear Colleagues,
> > > >
> > > > Can I enjoy and test all those nice "UEFI-GOP" features on a
> > > > 10.3-RELEASE system, or do I have to install CURRENT for that?
> > >
> > > AFAIK you can checkout
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:21:10PM -0700, Peter Grehan wrote:
> >> [Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file
> >> [D:\autounattend.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is
> >> invalid.]
> >
> > Something is wrong with your autounattend.xml file.
>
> Still working on the
>On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:07:13AM +, Matt Churchyard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:21:10PM -0700, Peter Grehan wrote:
> > >> [Windows could not parse or process unattend answer file
> > >> [D:\autounattend.xml] for pass [windowsPE]. The answer file is
> > >> invalid.]
> > >
> > >
>I was able to install the Windows 2016 using the GUI method.
>One proble.
>It is assigned an IP but
>the netmask and the default route is not showing up.
>Also The virtual Windows 2016 box does not see a network interface.
This makes very little sense. You usually specify the netmask and
>I was able to install the Windows 2016 using the GUI method.
>One proble.
>It is assigned an IP but
>the netmask and the default route is not showing up.
>Also The virtual Windows 2016 box does not see a network interface.
This makes very little sense. You usually specify the netmask and
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Daniel Tihanyi wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 08:02 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:02:57AM +, Matt Churchyard wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I was able to install the Windows 2016 using the GUI method.
> > > >
> > > > One
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Matt Churchyard via freebsd-virtualization
<freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org<mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>>
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Daniel Tihanyi wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 08:02 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter Grehan
Sent: 25 October 2016 19:19
To: Randy Terbush
Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Installing SQL Server on Windows 2012 bhyve
> >
> > > 1. Does ARC actually cache zfs volumes (not files/datasets)?
> >
> > Yes it does.
>
> I find this distinction between volumes/files/etc and what is cached
> causes confusion (as well as "volumes not datasets").
>
> Both ZVOLs and Z file systems are types of dataset. A dataset stores
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>
> > 1. Does ARC actually cache zfs volumes (not files/datasets)?
>
> Yes it does.
I find this distinction between volumes/files/etc and what is cached causes
confusion (as well as "volumes not datasets").
Both ZVOLs and Z file systems are types of dataset. A dataset
Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> first I tried to install windows10 ltsc 2019 onto a nvme disk.
> This failed, the windows installer did not find a disk to install.
>
> Then I tried the following setup:
> ...
> disk0_type="ahci-hd"
> disk0_dev="zvol"
> disk0_name="disk0"
> disk1_type="nvme"
>
>I just updated my bhyve server running CURRENT up to r349133 and can't start
>my network switch. I suspect that this problem has a root cause in the kernel
>configuration change made on 20190507 that created if_tuntap to replace the
>tunnel and tap devices. My vm switch has been in use for
Victor Sudakov wrote on 2019-04-22 19:43:
...
>> And the implementation is pretty brutal:
>> # 'vm stopall'
>> # stop all bhyve instances
>> # note this will also stop instances not started by vm-bhyve #
>> core::stopall(){
>> local _pids=$(pgrep -f 'bhyve:')
>>
>> echo "Shutting down
Hello.
I'd like to run a FreeBSD 11.3 VM under FreeBSD 12.1.
As I'm already using vm-bhyve to run a Windows guest, I think the best (or
possibly only) choice is to use bhyve for the FreeBSD guest too.
I've got the following conf file:
> guest="freebsd"
> loader="bhyveload"
> cpu=1
>
Hello,
Is there a reason why the resident memory used by a bhyve guest is quite
different when comparing ps/top & bhyvectl?
Does bhyvectl take in account something in kernel space that top/ps doesn't see?
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZRSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
root 12670 0.1
> On 9 Jan 2020, at 18:58, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> 2016 is slow (even slower doing windows updates). 2019 is much better. A
>>> tip I have found is a minimum of 1 cpu, 2 cores and 4 threads to get decent
>>> speed from that OS (more CPUs in bhyve >tends to make performance
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 08:37, Rodney W. Grimes
mailto:freebsd-...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>> wrote:
>
> Loading kernel...
> /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x168fdf1 data=0x1d0a68+0x768d80
> syms=[0x8+0x178bc0+0x8+0x1969d5]
> Loading configured modules...
> can't find '/boot/entropy'
> /
> "
>
> I get either
Hi,
> >2016 is slow (even slower doing windows updates). 2019 is much better. A
> >tip I have found is a minimum of 1 cpu, 2 cores and 4 threads to get decent
> >speed from that OS (more CPUs in bhyve >tends to make performance worse - in
> >my observations - in 2016). Also, use the Virtio
Hello,
I've recently got hold of some Dell C6220 systems (2 servers in a single
chassis) while I was hoping to use for bhyve
The basic spec of a single server is as follows -
Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 (VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID)
64GB DDR3
LSI MegaRaid 9265-8i
FreeBSD 12.1
I had a bit of
> Hi,
> >2016 is slow (even slower doing windows updates). 2019 is much better. A
> >tip I have found is a minimum of 1 cpu, 2 cores and 4 threads to get decent
> >speed from that OS (more CPUs in bhyve >tends to make performance worse - in
> >my observations - in 2016). Also, use the
32 matches
Mail list logo
