Cool! Glad to have helped!
-a
On 29 November 2013 00:47, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Modify that function to print out keg-uk_name as well.
Done. See:
Well, the first step is figuring out which UMA zones are actually
problematic. Isn't it logging which zones aren't empty?
-a
On 26 November 2013 20:01, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Adrian,
As part of looking at this bug in FreeNAS:
Panic on new jail with vnet
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Well, the first step is figuring out which UMA zones are actually
problematic. Isn't it logging which zones aren't empty?
The error messages on the console look like this:
Freed UMA keg was not empty (203 items). Lost
Modify that function to print out keg-uk_name as well.
-a
On 27 November 2013 12:45, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Well, the first step is figuring out which UMA zones are actually
problematic. Isn't
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the bug on
a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session.
the obvious problem line is :
routetbl 2684 303890K
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the
bug on a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session.
the obvious
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the
bug on a debug kernel
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net a écrit
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
This is a serial console log
Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@... writes:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@... wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Marko Zec wrote:
Actually, we never seriously discussed or revisited the issue with
separate
UMA pools for each vnet instance.
My original
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Dan wrote:
Hi,
I have been experiencing a similar problem. I am running
Freebsd8.1 64bit Release and after closing
my server application I come across
this type of message
Freed UMA keg was not empty (672 items). Lost 4 pages of
memory
The more virtual nodes I use the
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 06:57:53 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hi,
first of all freebsd-virtualization@ is the better list for this; Cc:ed.
We are using FreeBSD + VIMAGE at work, and we have seen an annoying
problem : there seems to be a memory
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Marko Zec wrote:
Actually, we never seriously discussed or revisited the issue with separate
UMA pools for each vnet instance.
My original motivation when O introduced separate UMA pools was primarily in
making it easier to spot resource leaks, and to prove the correctness
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Marko Zec wrote:
Actually, we never seriously discussed or revisited the issue with
separate
UMA pools for each vnet instance.
My original motivation when O introduced separate UMA
16 matches
Mail list logo