RE: 11-RELEASE and live migration

My setup... Hosts: Two Dell R310's, each one as follows: 32gb ram, L3480 cpu, 4 gigabit nics, two 300gb disks (mirrored), where the local disk is used only to hold xenserver 7.0 with all patches up through and including today. These machines are 100% up to date on firmware, patches, bios, etc.

RE: 11-RELEASE and live migration

Rainer wrote... -- We've also seen this (unexplainable reboots, I think they happen after migrations). But it never hangs. It seems to actually "reboot", as if somebody had pressed CTRL-ALT-DEL or typed "reboot". - I should also point out... on the same pair of hosts, there are a few

RE: disk loss

Egoitz wrote... I would recommend you using NFS instead of iSCSI. It’s far more better to handle the connection to disk arrays (the FreeNAS in this situation) through a mature and stable protocol like NFS and not something manipulating blocks directly. I would advise you to rely the

RE: Terrible performance of XenServer 6.2 and FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE guest

to assign an IP and open up ssh ;) Jay West, President EZwind.net 11 The Pines Court, Suite B Chesterfield, MO 63141 P: 314-781-1800 F: 314-558-9284 E: jw...@ezwind.net W: www.ezwind.net -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf

Poor network performance

seem to be pf related. We do not have pf enabled at all so I have not gone that route. Should we be putting -tso in the vm's rc.conf ifconfig regardless? Jay West, President EZwind.net 11 The Pines Court, Suite B Chesterfield, MO 63141 P: 314-781-1800 F: 314-558-9284 E: jw...@ezwind.net W

RE: FreeBSD 10.0-R as Xen 'guest' - clarification?

I guess I could try it and see but is it also true that we no longer have to do the dance with removing the cd/dvd drive and fixing fstab for ad0 device naming convention? And what about the NO_ADAPTIVE _* kernel options - not needed? Jay West, President EZwind.net 11 The Pines Court, Suite B

tcp offloading

. So my question is; for best performance should TCP offloading be disabled in the VM, or the Xenserver (dom0), or should it be disabled in BOTH? Anyone have a definitive answer? Jay West EZwind.net PO Box 460474 Saint Louis, MO 63146 Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 Toll Free: (866

misc. questions

, or insight! Jay West EZwind.net PO Box 460474 Saint Louis, MO 63146 Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 Fax: (314) 558-9284 mailto:jw...@opensourceassociates.com jw...@ezwind.net This e-mail transmission may

RE: 9.1R?

Mark wrote You're not running XCP or XenServer. That's why you don't have those bugs. Exactly. I can confirm the bugs previously mentioned definitely exist and are 100% reproduceable. ___ freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list

9.1R?

to refer to the xen hd device (xbdX) or continue to use adX inside the VM for filesystem mounts (kinda like we need to change the network device {ex. bgeX} to xnX)? Just looking for a sanity check J Jay West EZwind.net PO Box 460474 Saint Louis, MO 63146 Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 Toll

RE: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts

Feedback Mark you absolutely ROCK. Jay West EZwind.net PO Box 460474 Saint Louis, MO 63146 Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 Fax: (314) 558-9284 jw...@ezwind.net This e-mail transmission may contain information