On 1/8/2010 1:23 AM, James Smith wrote:
...
We want to use XenServer (iscsi SAN storage) by Citrix and FreeBSD.
We've got a testing setup in place, so we can play around with the
features. FreeBSD runs and installs quite well within this environment,
along with Linux distros, Windows etc.
On 11/24/2010 10:03 AM, Yuriy Kohut wrote:
Hi,
It is for amd64 only, correct ?
I have only tested it on amd64, but I don't know of anything inherent in
the PV driver framework that would prevent it from operating on other
architectures.
Do you know is it stable enough ?
It has been quite
On 11/26/2010 8:56 AM, Yuriy Kohut wrote:
Hi,
I have just built XENHVM from RELANG_8_1.
RELENG_8_1 doesn't have the latest Xen PV code in it. stable/8 (RELENG_8 if
checking out of CVS instead of SVN?) does.
--
Justin
___
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
On 12/1/2010 4:52 AM, Yuriy Kohut wrote:
Hi,
Now your commit in place and I have built XENHVM on RELENG_8.
Some things are changed for me, but the issue still exists.
I will try to replicate your issues again later today. One notable
difference between my configuration and yours is that
The following reply was made to PR kern/152818; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Justin T. Gibbs gi...@scsiguy.com
To: Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/152818: [panic][xen] disk driver data cannot cross a page
boundary
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15
On 1/15/2011 3:12 AM, Janne Snabb wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Janne Snabb wrote:
It appears that that the netfront driver fails to get the vif mac
address which leads to panic shortly afterwards.
The patch at the bottom of this message solves the problem for me.
After that the current
On 5/12/11 11:48 AM, Janne Snabb wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Laurent Cligny wrote:
All FreeBSD VM are 8.2 amd64 with XENHVM kernel anf the Linux VM is a
Paravirtualized Debian amd64.
My suggestion would be to try out the same setup with GENERIC kernel
and the rtl driver (or even better e1000
On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeing breakage with ring_pages 1 on a blkfront; more precisely,
request
#32 has a garbage response (resulting in a panic) exactly as if the
dom0 thinks
we're only using a single page for the ring. Forcing ring_pages to 1
makes the
On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it possible that there's a bug
in how our blkfront negotiates the request ring? Does anyone have
ring_pages 1 in use
On 7/5/11 10:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
On 07/05/11 19:42, Colin Percival wrote:
On 07/05/11 19:04, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Maybe the right option is to have a loader tunable dev.xn.linuxback to
control which version of the protocol is used?
What
This work was sponsored by BQ Internet Corporation and they have
successfully migrated 100+ FreeBSD VMs with these changes (slightly
modified for use in 8.x). I'd like to have feedback from other
developers and FreeBSD Xen users before submitting this and/or
asking for approval to push them into
On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:55 -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
This work was sponsored by BQ Internet Corporation and they have
successfully migrated 100+ FreeBSD VMs with these changes (slightly
modified for use in 8.x). I'd
On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:55 -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
This work was sponsored by BQ Internet Corporation and they have
successfully migrated 100+ FreeBSD VMs with these changes (slightly
modified for use in 8.x). I'd
On 9/15/11 4:35 AM, Hugo Silva wrote:
On 09/15/11 05:43, Janne Snabb wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
I'm planning to ask RE for permission to merge the following netfront
fixes (listed below) into 9.0/head.
Assuming this is the same patch that I posted on the list after
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote:
Dear users,
I am trying to compare the 8.2 i386 PV mode and 9.0 amd64 hvm mode, regarding
$ xm shutdown
from outside.
While 8.2 PV shuts down well, 9.0 hvm does not. Is it an issue of the xen
hypervisor, or of freebsd?
On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
While working on improving XENHVM (I've been looking at adding PV
timers), I've realized that the event channel implementation in PV vs
HVM mode differs greatly. Xen PV port uses sys/xen/evtchn/evtchn.c while
On Mar 21, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
On 21/03/13 13:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
Hi Roger,
I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel
interface. In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers
I've been working to get the next chunk of Spectra/Roger Pau Monné Xen work
into head. The latest version of the patch I'm working on can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_intr.diff
I will continue my testing today and commit it tonight unless I hear
complaints.
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/29/13 09:32, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
I've been working to get the next chunk of Spectra/Roger Pau Monné Xen work
into head. The latest version of the patch I'm working on can be found here:
http
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org wrote:
In sys/x86/xen/hvm.c:
+/**
+ * If non-zero, the hypervisor has been configured to use a direct
+ * IDT event callback to the
+ */
This comment seems to be missing part of its
Fixed.
--
Justin
On Sep 2, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
While playing with driver domains using FreeBSD I've found out that
blkback in FreeBSD makes assumptions about the id of a request instead
of actually using the id of the request on the shared ring. This seems
In my continuing effort to get all of Roger's Xen enhancements into
FreeBSD, I'm just about finished reviewing the next patch in his
series. The current status of the patch can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_ipi.diff
The main, and late breaking, wrinkle for this
On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
On 02/09/13 22:03, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On Sep 2, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
While playing with driver domains using FreeBSD I've found out that
blkback in FreeBSD makes
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Hello,
I've found another issue with blkback handling of flush operations, it
was incorrectly setting one of the bio parameters when using a block
device as backend. The attached patch fixes it, and also includes a
On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:09 AM, Shanker Balan m...@shankerbalan.net wrote:
On 10-Oct-2013, at 1:37 PM, Shanker Balan m...@shankerbalan.net wrote:
On 09-Oct-2013, at 8:06 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 8:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 09/10/13 13:49, Mark
On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Karl Pielorz kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
With FreeBSD 10 being out now (Great!) - GENERIC appears now has everything
needed for Xen to run in PVHVM for amd64.
The man page for xen (man 4 xen) states you should have:
options NO_ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES
26 matches
Mail list logo
