In the vain hope this'll help others having this issue...
Having looked at this now for some time - and run a lot of tests, the
current best solution to allow a FreeBSD domU under XenServer 6.5 to act as
a gateway, or run OpenVPN (or dhcpd etc.) and remain agile - is to switch
to VirtIO
El 12/09/15 a les 0.13, Sydney Meyer ha escrit:
> I just noticed that these performance problems do not occur under 10.0 and
> 10.1.
>
> Starting with 10.2 IPv4 TCP performance drops from ~12 Gb/s under 10.1 to
> ~350 Mb/s under 10.2.
>
> Should i write a new bugreport for this?
Thanks for
I just read that you were working on importing a newer netfront from Linux and
thought that maybe this could help finding the culprint, as KVM users seemed to
have similar issues, e.g. issues with the offloading capabilities of the pv nic
and/or checksum errors.
Anyhow, awesome news that
I just noticed that these performance problems do not occur under 10.0 and 10.1.
Starting with 10.2 IPv4 TCP performance drops from ~12 Gb/s under 10.1 to ~350
Mb/s under 10.2.
Should i write a new bugreport for this?
> On 09 Sep 2015, at 22:58, Sydney Meyer wrote:
>
>
--On 08 September 2015 17:06 +0100 Karl Pielorz
wrote:
XenServer logs:
"Migrating VM 'FreeBSD (SWR)' from 'Xen1' to 'Xen2' Internal error:
Xenops_interface.Internal_error("Unix.Unix_error(2\"open\",\"/var/lib/xen
/qemu-save.36\")")"
As a follow-up to this - the
Hello,
El 09/09/15 a les 11.33, Karl Pielorz ha escrit:
>
>
> --On 09 September 2015 11:04 +0200 Roger Pau Monné
> wrote:
>
>> I'm working on importing a new netfront from Linux, which hopefully
>> should solve the problems we are having with the PV nic.
>
> That'll be
--On 09 September 2015 11:04 +0200 Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
I'm working on importing a new netfront from Linux, which hopefully
should solve the problems we are having with the PV nic.
That'll be great - I did test a CentOS box domU a while ago, and that
didn't have
--On 09 September 2015 11:04 +0200 Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
In the meantime, I have the following crappy patch to FreeBSD if_re
driver, which should disable the watchdog (I have not even compile
tested this).
fyi - The patch stops the 'watchdog timeout' errors - but
Hello,
I'm running Xen 4.4.1 on a Debian 8 Dom0 and with 2 fresh FreeBSD 10.2 DomU's
(pf disabled):
IPv4:
- Host A (FreeBSD 10.2): "dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M | nc -l 5001" ---> Host B
(FreeBSD 10.2) "nc 10.0.30.95 5001 | dd of=/dev/zero bs=1M" = ~46 MB/s
- Host A (FreeBSD 10.2): "dd if=/dev/zero
--On 07 September 2015 13:11 -0400 Adam McDougall
wrote:
Try this:
http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/329848-openbsd-with-message-watchdog-
timeout/
I've used it before for an OpenBSD guest VM. If that patch is in place
on any XenServer you migrate to, it should
El 07/09/15 a les 14.58, Karl Pielorz ha escrit:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a bunch of FreeBSD 10.1 hosts we run the NIC's as HVM (this
> avoids a known networking issue with XenServer and PV networks under
> FreeBSD to do with routing packets for other Xen DomU).
>
> This seems to work OK - but
--On 07 September 2015 16:51 +0200 Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
This sounds like a problem in the if_re driver on FreeBSD or a bug in
Qemu emulation. As a workaround, could you try to use the emulated e1000
instead of the realtek? AFAIK it should also provide better
Hi,
We have a bunch of FreeBSD 10.1 hosts we run the NIC's as HVM (this avoids
a known networking issue with XenServer and PV networks under FreeBSD to do
with routing packets for other Xen DomU).
This seems to work OK - but recently we've had a whole bunch of:
Sep 7 12:41:08 host1
On 09/07/2015 11:00, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> --On 07 September 2015 16:51 +0200 Roger Pau Monné
> wrote:
>
>> This sounds like a problem in the if_re driver on FreeBSD or a bug in
>> Qemu emulation. As a workaround, could you try to use the emulated e1000
>> instead of the
14 matches
Mail list logo