Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 Sounds good. And thanks! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 [wsimpson - Sat Oct 20 10:12:55 2007]: Daniel Markstedt wrote: On 10/20/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about the (PR#39718) Turkish nation fixes? I originally planned to wait until 2.1.1 before committing, but since everyone else have been making exceptions to the code freeze, I might go ahead with it tonight after all. ;) Looking at the commits of Oct 7, my thought is to just drop the _() sections, and commit the rest. That is, leave for later the changes Turkic (ottoman.ruleset) and Turk (turk.ruleset) to Turkish. Done. As of today, seven days have passed since the release of RC1. I believe that it has passed the test according to the criteria we set up. I have about half a day with nothing else planned on Saturday that I could devote to Freeciv. If you're all ok with it, I'll tag 2.1.0 on Oct 27th a few hours after midnight CET (about noon locally) leaving a few more days for translators to patch up their work and for us to do some more smoke testing. Thoughts? ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 Regarding the recent SDL additions to 2.1, I'm comfortable going ahead with the release without another rc# cycle. SDL isn't (yet) finished, but the new SDL features will make it *much* more likely to be tested in the future (2.1.1 or 2.2)! The Turkish translations seem to be coming on apace, should we wait? What about the (PR#39718) Turkish nation fixes? Anything else urgent? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 On 10/20/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 Regarding the recent SDL additions to 2.1, I'm comfortable going ahead with the release without another rc# cycle. SDL isn't (yet) finished, but the new SDL features will make it *much* more likely to be tested in the future (2.1.1 or 2.2)! Agreed. The Turkish translations seem to be coming on apace, should we wait? Let's ask Ugur. If he's on track to finalize his work, it could be worth waiting a few days for. What about the (PR#39718) Turkish nation fixes? I originally planned to wait until 2.1.1 before committing, but since everyone else have been making exceptions to the code freeze, I might go ahead with it tonight after all. ;) Anything else urgent? The changelog have to be updated, but that is also the very last thing that should go in before tagging. ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 [wsimpson - Jeu. Oct. 18 12:09:30 2007]: Pepeto _ wrote: You decided that 2.0 is at end-of-life. But you are not alone in this project: this must be discuted before take a decision. To the best of my knowledge, the entire active group of developers decided that 2.0 is at end-of-life. I had even posted a report to coordinate 2.0.10, and it was not released. The discussion is over. Sorry I didn't know about it. I didn't read any comment about it before yours. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 Pepeto _ wrote: Sorry I didn't know about it. I didn't read any comment about it before yours. That is not true. I explicitly pointed you at the 2.0.10 (PR#39441) ticket as of (PR#39575) Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:48:37 -0700. Both of those tickets are numbered and dated after the beginning of your participation. You posted to this list about (PR#39358) vote in pregame as far back as Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:18:54 -0700. I'll just point out for the record that I participated on this list circa 18 months before asking to be a developer And I'm an internationally well-known Internet Engineer and open source developer, with design credit in every *BSD release for many years. Remember that Google is your friend. Folks can check your assertions. Also, please participate here under your actual name, not a pseudonym. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 [wsimpson - Jeu. Oct. 18 17:30:16 2007]: Pepeto _ wrote: Sorry I didn't know about it. I didn't read any comment about it before yours. That is not true. I explicitly pointed you at the 2.0.10 (PR#39441) ticket as of (PR#39575) Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:48:37 -0700. Both of those tickets are numbered and dated after the beginning of your participation. You posted to this list about (PR#39358) vote in pregame as far back as Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:18:54 -0700. I'll just point out for the record that I participated on this list circa 18 months before asking to be a developer And I'm an internationally well-known Internet Engineer and open source developer, with design credit in every *BSD release for many years. Remember that Google is your friend. Folks can check your assertions. Also, please participate here under your actual name, not a pseudonym. 1- I didn't know PR#39441. 2- My first ticket was before Wed, 25 Apr 2007. 3- I don't care that you are famous. 4- I think you don't know who I am, and what is my experience with Freeciv. 5- The only reason I'm not a developer to your eyes is, I just got rights to be one, and all said no commit before 2.1.0 release, so I was waiting (what you didn't: rev 13774). 6- I leave. There is no reason I fuck this project more than what you did. 7- I'm happy to don't be associated to the next S2_1 shit. I never hated you, I just point to you some points which were against the project. You fucked all the S2_0 branch, I just reported it. Good luck to save Freeciv. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39784) 2.0 end-of-life, releasing 2.1
On 10/19/07, Pepeto _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39784 [wsimpson - Jeu. Oct. 18 17:30:16 2007]: Pepeto _ wrote: Sorry I didn't know about it. I didn't read any comment about it before yours. That is not true. I explicitly pointed you at the 2.0.10 (PR#39441) ticket as of (PR#39575) Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:48:37 -0700. Both of those tickets are numbered and dated after the beginning of your participation. You posted to this list about (PR#39358) vote in pregame as far back as Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:18:54 -0700. I'll just point out for the record that I participated on this list circa 18 months before asking to be a developer And I'm an internationally well-known Internet Engineer and open source developer, with design credit in every *BSD release for many years. Remember that Google is your friend. Folks can check your assertions. Also, please participate here under your actual name, not a pseudonym. 1- I didn't know PR#39441. 2- My first ticket was before Wed, 25 Apr 2007. 3- I don't care that you are famous. 4- I think you don't know who I am, and what is my experience with Freeciv. 5- The only reason I'm not a developer to your eyes is, I just got rights to be one, and all said no commit before 2.1.0 release, so I was waiting (what you didn't: rev 13774). 6- I leave. There is no reason I fuck this project more than what you did. 7- I'm happy to don't be associated to the next S2_1 shit. I never hated you, I just point to you some points which were against the project. You fucked all the S2_0 branch, I just reported it. Good luck to save Freeciv. Pepeto, William: could you please keep your bickering off this list. Whatever personal differences you two have, it shouldn't be allowed to ruin the atmosphere of the project as a whole. Thank you, ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
