Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread Per I. Mathisen
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote: > You don't have a 2.0.* client. That's an unreleased development client. We have for a long time been running a fresh checkout of stable branches for pubserver games, since this way we cou

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread Per I. Mathisen
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote: > If there were packet specific capabilities There are. See doc/README.delta - Per ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread William Allen Simpson
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > Pepeto _ wrote: > You are wrong, the 2.0 branch is supposed be stable. All the user with a > 2.0.* client would be able to play on a 2.0.* server without > compatibility problems. > You don't have a 2.0.* client. That's an unreleased develo

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread William Allen Simpson
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 16/08/07, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is no documented packet specific capability string. > > version.in, common/cap.c > That is not a documented packet specific capability string.

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread Marko Lindqvist
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > On 16/08/07, Pepeto _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > at revision 13068, 13069 and 13070, ATTRIBUTE_CHUNK_SIZE had been changed. > But, ATTRIBUTE_CHUNK_SIZE is used to define packets. Yes, this has to reverted from S2_1 and S2_0 immediately.

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread Marko Lindqvist
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > On 16/08/07, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > > > Pepeto _ wrote: > > IT'S VERY DANGEROUS TO CHANGE PACKET DEFINITIONS WITHOUT REDEFINE > > CAPABILITY STRING. > > > Th

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread Pepeto _
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > > [wsimpson - Jeu. AoĆ». 16 13:48:36 2007]: > > Pepeto _ wrote: > There is no released version with this new code. > > IT'S VERY DANGEROUS TO RUN DEVELOPMENT CODE AGAINST RELEASED SERVERS. > > You want to run development code, you also have

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread William Allen Simpson
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > Pepeto _ wrote: > IT'S VERY DANGEROUS TO CHANGE PACKET DEFINITIONS WITHOUT REDEFINE > CAPABILITY STRING. > There is no documented packet specific capability string. There is no released version with this new code. IT'S VERY DANGEROUS TO RU

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39575) Redefinition of packets crash

2007-08-16 Thread Pepeto _
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39575 > at revision 13068, 13069 and 13070, ATTRIBUTE_CHUNK_SIZE had been changed. But, ATTRIBUTE_CHUNK_SIZE is used to define packets. PACKET_PLAYER_ATTRIBUTE_CHUNK=47; pre-send, sc,cs,handle-via-packet UINT32 offset, total_length, chunk_length;