Update of bug #16387 (project freeciv):
Category:None = general
Status: Need Info = Wont Fix
Assigned to:None = pepeto
Open/Closed:
Update of bug #16387 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Need Info
___
Follow-up Comment #5:
Could someone confirm or infirm this is a bug? It appears to me to be a
feature of the shuffled
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #16387 (project freeciv):
It doesn't seem like a bug to me.
With Freeciv in its default concurrent phasemode, you can't rely on a
particular order of things happening on the next turn, as any player can
notionally do anything at any time. However, as I understand it,
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #16387 (project freeciv):
As I explained, the unit which perform the action first doesn't depend of the
action it is accomplishing, but the order of its owner in the new turn. The
move you are commenting *is* possible because at the new turn the unit gets
its move
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16387 (project freeciv):
As far as I know, the result of a such situation is random. It depends of the
random order of the player for that turn. If the pillager player plays first,
then the pillage will be completed, else not.
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #16387 (project freeciv):
I expected the pillaging to complete before the pillager dies. I might have
confusion about the 'goto' command: because the turn change refills the
movement points of the attacker, I expected the attacker to move _after_ the
turn change.
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16387
Summary: attacker can abuse 'go to' to stop pillager
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: kernigh
Submitted on: Sunday 08/08/2010 at 20:32
Category: None
Severity: 2 - Minor
