ok, doing it now.
On 5/22/07, Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen any replies in this thread that argue Subversion is a
bad idea, but let's make this a FINAL CALL before we go ahead. If no
one speaks up by this time tomorrow,
On 5/16/07, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen any replies in this thread that argue Subversion is a
bad idea, but let's make this a FINAL CALL before we go ahead. If no
one speaks up by this time tomorrow, I think Bart gets the go-ahead to
convert the FreeDOS CVS to Subversion
Hi,
is CVS really used at the moment? I thought, that most people have
sent patches to current maintainer.
Bye
Flo
On 5/16/07, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen any replies in this thread that argue Subversion is a
bad idea, but let's make this a FINAL CALL before we go ahead.
PS:
A DOS version of CVS exists...of Subversion too?
--
It is true that no one can essentially cultivate exact science
without understanding the mathematics of that science. But we are not
to suppose that the calculations and equations that mathematicians
find so useful constitute the whole
Hi,
would people here support a conversion of the FreeDOS CVS repository
(kernel, freecom, install, mem) to Subversion (SVN)? One big plus is
that CRLF problems would be mostly a thing of the past... what has
happened a lot is that people check out CVS files on *nix, get LF line
endings, correct
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Bart Oldeman wrote:
Hi,
would people here support a conversion of the FreeDOS CVS repository
(kernel, freecom, install, mem) to Subversion (SVN)? One big plus is
that CRLF problems would be mostly a thing of the past... what has
happened a lot is that people check out
I have no objection to SVN, but I haven't edited any sources in a
while so maybe I'm not a good person to chime in. :-)
If we do decide to migrate to Subversion, we should use the SVN
repository on SourceForge (it's not activated yet, but it's there to
be used.) This helps to keep all
I'm just curious, as I have never used much of cvs and none of SVN
(just MS Sourcesafe, pvcs and other commercial solutions), what would
be the main advantages of SVN to CVS?
(in other words, why would you care to make such a big effort?
probably there are many good reasons, then).
Aitor
On 5/15/07, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious, as I have never used much of cvs and none of SVN
(just MS Sourcesafe, pvcs and other commercial solutions), what would
be the main advantages of SVN to CVS?
Losing the line-ending annoyance for one... there are other
On 5/15/07, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no objection to SVN, but I haven't edited any sources in a
while so maybe I'm not a good person to chime in. :-)
If we do decide to migrate to Subversion, we should use the SVN
repository on SourceForge (it's not activated yet, but it's
10 matches
Mail list logo
