Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-18 Thread JK Benedict
that can benefit the core of FreeDOS *while* preserving its intentions. --jkbs | @xenfomation From: Antony Gordon [mailto:cuzint...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:37 PM To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello! I

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-18 Thread Tom Ehlert
iting code or compiling things :) > > Thanks for the reply and will research/download the wifi drivers as soon as > possible. > > --jesse/jkbs > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de] > Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:17 AM &g

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-18 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
I just >> don't feel like writing code or compiling things :) >> >> Thanks for the reply and will research/download the wifi drivers as soon >> as >> possible. >> >> --jesse/jkbs >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread Antony Gordon
code or compiling things :) > > Thanks for the reply and will research/download the wifi drivers as soon as > possible. > > --jesse/jkbs > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de] > Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:17 AM > To: freedos-deve

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread JK Benedict
Thanks for the reply and will research/download the wifi drivers as soon as possible. --jesse/jkbs -Original Message- From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de] Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:17 AM To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello! Hi Jesse,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread JK Benedict
ubject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello! On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM, JK Benedict wrote: [SNIP] > - Base resources, such as file system options/changes > - Connectivity tools > * Modernized web browser (I am working on one now - a text > based > prototype) There's Georg Pott

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jesse, Centralized documentation makes sense, but why would you put 100 packages in a centralized source code repository if 95 of them have not a single source code change in a whole year? And why do nightly builds of all 100 then? DOS heavily relies on classic software that simply is okay as

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
There is WIFI drivers available,but they are often made for a specific wireless card.Your best bet is to make a driver that can interpret ethernet signals.Since information is coming from the internet to the ethernet cables,you can get information/data from the internet using a parallel port driver

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread Steve Nickolas
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Louis Santillan wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM, JK Benedict wrote: > [SNIP] >> - Base resources, such as file system options/changes >> - Connectivity tools >> * Modernized web browser (I am working on one now - a text based >> prototype) > > There's Georg P

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-17 Thread Mateusz Viste
Hello JK, That's an extensive list :) On 17/05/2015 04:44, JK Benedict wrote: > Priority 1: Centralized Documentation > ~~ > - Single-source for links to mailing list, project goals, components, > completion, owners, priority, etc This is the purpose of www.freedos.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-16 Thread Louis Santillan
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM, JK Benedict wrote: [SNIP] > - Base resources, such as file system options/changes > - Connectivity tools > * Modernized web browser (I am working on one now - a text based > prototype) There's Georg Potthast's Dillo port (in XFDOS [0]), and Arachne (beside

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-16 Thread JK Benedict
CHARBONNEAU [mailto:jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org] Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 10:03 AM To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello! To make DOS use all of a computers resources (taking full advantage of your CPU,RAM,ETC.),you need to be able

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-16 Thread JK Benedict
p and track/keep a database of things to be installed, tested, uninstalled, etc. --jesse/jkbs | @xenfomation -Original Message- From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de] Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:01 AM To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Subject: Re: [Freed

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-16 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 16/05/2015 13:01, Eric Auer wrote: > Thanks for the interesting FreeDOS wish list, Mateusz! Actually, I think it would be good to put such list somewhere on our Wiki, I will see to edit something. If anyone can think of some reasonable needs found in real-world situations, please chip in, I w

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-16 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
To make DOS use all of a computers resources (taking full advantage of your CPU,RAM,ETC.),you need to be able to program is ASM (assembly language).This allows you COMPLETE control over the program.It allows you to program in specific hardware calls,ETC.However,we are all used to more friendly lang

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-16 Thread Eric Auer
Hi! Thanks for the interesting FreeDOS wish list, Mateusz! > - Extend one of the existing network stacks with full IPv6 support Really? But then how about GPT partition support first? :-) > ... box and another PC) - maybe a NFS browser, or even just > a free equivalent of the old LapLink tool.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-15 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 15/05/2015 23:47, J.K. Benedict wrote: > ‎After years of using FreeDOS, I have found it apropos to contribute. I > am still reviewing road maps, current utilities, and preferred languages. Hi, Here below is a short list of stuff that could need contributing, from the top of my head: Creati

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-15 Thread J.K. Benedict
questions for FreeDOS developers. Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello! On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, J.K. Benedict wrote: [SNIP] > #1. Has anyone assembled a doc on creating the preferred "developer's > sandbox"? I use many languages and want to ensure any software I offer meet

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-15 Thread Louis Santillan
Forgot to mention (Open/Free)GEM [0] and Windows 3.1x, 95, 98 [1]. [0] http://www.freedos.org/software/?prog=opengem [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Louis Santillan wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, J.K. Benedict > wrote: > [SNIP] >> #1. H

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-15 Thread Louis Santillan
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, J.K. Benedict wrote: [SNIP] > #1. Has anyone assembled a doc on creating the preferred "developer's > sandbox"? I use many languages and want to ensure any software I offer meets Read here [0][1][2][3]. Short answer, "reference C compiler" is "OpenWatcom C", and

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!

2015-05-15 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jesse :-) Which tools you want to use to develop largely depends on which existing DOS software you want to improve - you want to use some toolchain which is compatible. If you want to write a new thing for DOS, it simply depends on your personal taste, combined with the de-facto requirement t

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello EMM386/HIMEM 2.26, Good-bye Michael

2006-08-26 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Michael Devore schreef: > Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ are the files > emmx226.zip, EMM386 2.26 and HIMEM version 3.26 memory manager, mostly > executable files; and emms226.zip, source code files. The FTP-challenged > may find the files at http://www.devoresoftwar

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello again

2004-07-19 Thread Johnson Lam
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:04:01 -0400, you wrote: Hi Pat, >Hello everyone. Just subscribed to the mailing lists again. Glad to see you back! >As for me, I'm going to just be lurking for a while. I have a project >in mind which may be based on FreeDOS, but haven't come to any decisions >yet. >