@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
Hi Jesse,
Centralized documentation makes sense, but why would you put 100 packages in
a centralized source code repository if 95 of them have not a single source
code change in a whole year?
And why do nightly builds
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
Hi Jesse,
Centralized documentation makes sense, but why would you put 100 packages
in
a centralized source code repository if 95 of them have not a single
source
code change in a whole year?
And why do nightly builds of all 100 then? DOS
mailto:freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
Hi Jesse,
Centralized documentation makes sense, but why would you put 100 packages in
a centralized source code repository if 95 of them have not a single source
code change in a whole year?
And why do nightly builds
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Louis Santillan wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM, JK Benedict xenfomat...@outlook.com wrote:
[SNIP]
- Base resources, such as file system options/changes
- Connectivity tools
* Modernized web browser (I am working on one now - a text based
prototype)
drivers as soon as
possible.
--jesse/jkbs
-Original Message-
From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:17 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
Hi Jesse,
Centralized documentation makes sense, but why would
: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM, JK Benedict xenfomat...@outlook.com
wrote:
[SNIP]
- Base resources, such as file system options/changes
- Connectivity tools
* Modernized web browser (I am working on one now - a text
based
prototype)
There's Georg Potthast's Dillo
and will research/download the wifi drivers as soon as
possible.
--jesse/jkbs
-Original Message-
From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:17 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
Hi Jesse,
Centralized documentation makes
Hi Jesse,
Centralized documentation makes sense, but why
would you put 100 packages in a centralized
source code repository if 95 of them have not
a single source code change in a whole year?
And why do nightly builds of all 100 then? DOS
heavily relies on classic software that simply
is okay
There is WIFI drivers available,but they are often made for a specific
wireless card.Your best bet is to make a driver that can interpret ethernet
signals.Since information is coming from the internet to the ethernet
cables,you can get information/data from the internet using a parallel port
To make DOS use all of a computers resources (taking full advantage of your
CPU,RAM,ETC.),you need to be able to program is ASM (assembly
language).This allows you COMPLETE control over the program.It allows you
to program in specific hardware calls,ETC.However,we are all used to more
friendly
On 16/05/2015 13:01, Eric Auer wrote:
Thanks for the interesting FreeDOS wish list, Mateusz!
Actually, I think it would be good to put such list somewhere on our
Wiki, I will see to edit something. If anyone can think of some
reasonable needs found in real-world situations, please chip in, I
of things to be installed, tested, uninstalled,
etc.
--jesse/jkbs | @xenfomation
-Original Message-
From: Eric Auer [mailto:e.a...@jpberlin.de]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:01 AM
To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
Hi!
Thanks
CHARBONNEAU [mailto:jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 10:03 AM
To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Hello!
To make DOS use all of a computers resources (taking full advantage of your
CPU,RAM,ETC.),you need to be able
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM, JK Benedict xenfomat...@outlook.com wrote:
[SNIP]
- Base resources, such as file system options/changes
- Connectivity tools
* Modernized web browser (I am working on one now - a text based
prototype)
There's Georg Potthast's Dillo port (in XFDOS [0]),
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, J.K. Benedict xenfomat...@outlook.com wrote:
[SNIP]
#1. Has anyone assembled a doc on creating the preferred developer's
sandbox? I use many languages and want to ensure any software I offer meets
Read here [0][1][2][3]. Short answer, reference C compiler is
Forgot to mention (Open/Free)GEM [0] and Windows 3.1x, 95, 98 [1].
[0] http://www.freedos.org/software/?prog=opengem
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Louis Santillan lpsan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, J.K. Benedict
Michael Devore schreef:
Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ are the files
emmx226.zip, EMM386 2.26 and HIMEM version 3.26 memory manager, mostly
executable files; and emms226.zip, source code files. The FTP-challenged
may find the files at
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:04:01 -0400, you wrote:
Hi Pat,
Hello everyone. Just subscribed to the mailing lists again.
Glad to see you back!
As for me, I'm going to just be lurking for a while. I have a project
in mind which may be based on FreeDOS, but haven't come to any decisions
yet.
18 matches
Mail list logo
