Hi,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:56 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org wrote:
My main problem,Rugluxio,was that it wont boot my harddrive after I run the
format /s command on it.My harddrive doesn't seem to like booting.Which is
funny,because I had it working perfectly 2 months
Hi!
I've tried everything.I ran format /s,I ran Fdisk,I've made the harddrive
bootable.But when I go to boot into the harddrive,my laptop just restarts.
There are various pretty technical reasons that could cause this:
BIOS and DOS disagreeing about geometry when you run SYS or FORMAT
versus
I've tried everything.I ran format /s,I ran Fdisk,I've made the harddrive
bootable.But when I go to boot into the harddrive,my laptop just restarts.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:56 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
A port of DOS to ARM would not be bound to any existing API and would not
need to be compatible with any existing DOS implementations, while still
being a port of DOS.
-uso.
--
I agree, a 32-bit kernel would open up worlds of possibilities for the DOS
platform.
Also, just to clarify, I wasn't asking anyone's permission, just probing to
see what kind of interest there is out there.
I used to follow DOSCore and Aura closely back in the day when I was
working (off and on,
I am considering starting a test project to determine the feasibility of
implementing a 32-bit FreeDOS kernel. If I decide to do so, who else is
interested in contributing?
Said contributors could assist in coding, help with testing, establish and
evolve standards for the project, create
To see it on the arm architecture I think would be a good long term goal
for a 32 bit kernel.
Raspberry pi and other small arm boards are cheap and affordable and would
breathe life into the dos platform.
You don't need the freedos community approval or help as such for a
project. Just do it.
Low end *nix apps could be ported in place of over dos apps hell we could
just make a Linux distro and slap a freedos sticker on it lol.
Problem is there are two arguments here.. why and why not.
If you build it they will come. If you don't then be happy carrying your
xt's on your back.
On
Doesn't matter, Mac os power pc applications dont work on new Mac os but
it's still the same os.
(rosetta comparability layer aside)
I see this as more of a chance for a new generation of dos. Freedos 1.x has
accomplished the needs for the existing replacement or clone requirements
of a dos with
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Chelson Aitcheson wrote:
Doesn't matter, Mac os power pc applications dont work on new Mac os but
it's still the same os.
(rosetta comparability layer aside)
I see this as more of a chance for a new generation of dos. Freedos 1.x has
accomplished the needs for the
Nothing is impossible if it was the case we would all still be using reel
to reel and tape decks lol.
Lots of ideas and spit balling here but hey why not write it up and if
people wana contribute then they will if not keep using old trusty xt
On 06/06/2015 8:39 am, Steve Nickolas
Eric,
That mainly is because Apple is Apple ;-) In DOS, you get very
far with a standard C library, good old OpenWatcom or DJGPP, in
the latter case even similar enough to the Linux GCC and G++ C
and C++ infrastructure to ease porting of things to DOS. As DOS
does not provide GUI,
Hey,
On Jun 5, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Chelson Aitcheson chelson.aitche...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nothing is impossible if it was the case we would all still be using reel to
reel and tape decks lol.
Lots of ideas and spit balling here but hey why not write it up and if people
wana contribute
Perhaps.I know it booted to my harddrive two months ago.Why wouldn't it
work now?Hm.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi!
I've tried everything.I ran format /s,I ran Fdisk,I've made the harddrive
bootable.But when I go to boot into the harddrive,my
14 matches
Mail list logo
