Hi guys,
BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
No, it hasn't.
I was halfway implying that FreeDOS wasn't necessarily incompetent
here, that it just hasn't changed much upstream since then. Hence
there's really nothing "new" to ship.
I know, there really is nothing we c
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Joe Forster/STA wrote:
>
>> BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
>
> No, it hasn't.
I was halfway implying that FreeDOS wasn't necessarily incompetent
here, that it just hasn't changed much upstream since then. Hence
there's really nothi
Hi guys,
BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
No, it hasn't. Version 6.0 is supposed to be a major release, only with
some bug fixes (I also reported one and it got fixed) and preparation for
another major release, version 6.1 (or 7.0). Same with Zip 3.0 -> 3.1.
If I
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> The 16 bit unzip is probably quite limited in performance
> and the range of files which it can unzip, but that is only
> a guess...
BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
So, if you're desperate to have a 16-bit build
Hi sparky4,
> this is most annoying i cannot do my usual file transfer with the
> freedos 1.2 unzip! gah!! why!?
The 16 bit unzip is probably quite limited in performance
and the range of files which it can unzip, but that is only
a guess... I do wonder how you installed FreeDOS 1.2 on a
28
