-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I would install 2 tools:
UDMA2
LBACACHE
With both, it is very fast!!
Bye, Flo
- --
http://www.drdos.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Hi!
17--2005 23:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Massimo Pizzolante Leuzzi) wrote to Arkady
V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MPL primary precompiled files
MPL http://www.fdos.org/kernel/KERNEL.SYS [stable kernel]
MPL http://www.fdos.org/kernel/KERNEL.dev.SYS [dev kernel]
MPL I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
What is the current status of CT Mouse?
v2.0 alpha 4...it is under development?
Bye, Flo
- --
http://www.drdos.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
At 02:49 PM 3/18/2005 +0200, Kristaps Kaupe wrote:
I had problems with DJGPP (long compile times, mystical error messages) until
I removed FreeDOS EMM386 from my CONFIG.SYS.
Heavy port I/O and use of software interrupts are way too freaking slow in
V86 mode, no doubt about it. No way around it,
Hi Michael,
I had problems with DJGPP (long compile times, mystical error messages)
until I removed FreeDOS EMM386 from my CONFIG.SYS.
Heavy port I/O and use of software interrupts are way too freaking slow in
V86 mode, no doubt about it. No way around it, either, as it's the nature
of
Hi, has any VIM user tried the DOS version recently, in particular
the 32bit DOS version (you probably need CWSDPMI to run it) vim63d32.zip?
http://www.vim.org/download.php
As VIM-non-user it is always hard to tell whether you have a good
port installed or not X-).
For me, that is. I
At 06:24 PM 3/18/2005 +0100, Eric Auer wrote:
Heavy port I/O and use of software interrupts are way too freaking slow in
V86 mode, no doubt about it. No way around it, either, as it's the nature
of V86 mode.
Not true - in Pentium and newer CPUs, you have VME, which allow
software interrupts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I tried it last year. But i don't like it. For editing i usually use
SetEdit or Necromancer DOS Navigator.
Bye, Flo
- --
http://www.drdos.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
Hello, all:
I've been fiddling with an MS-DOS script to find out what drive
letter is assigned to a ram drive, trying to get it to work with
tdsk and FreeDOS.
I've run into two differences that suprised me.
1. The VOL command built into command.com appears to
output to stderr instead of
Hi!
18--2005 18:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florian Xaver) wrote to fd-user
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
FX What is the current status of CT Mouse?
1.9.1 and 2.0 alpha 4.
FX v2.0 alpha 4...it is under development?
Now news since this (yet).
From: Kristaps Kaupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: NSS
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Compilation with DJGPP using RHIDE
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:49:12 +0200
Reply-To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
I had problems with DJGPP (long compile times,
Well, I'm _not_ searching any password program, because for my own use I
have the mine, I am just interested if other people are using (or would
using) such software, because if there are a lot of users needing a
password program, it could be worth to think about including into the
FreeDOS
At 06:24 PM 3/18/2005 +0100, you wrote:
Not true - in Pentium and newer CPUs, you have VME, which allow
software interrupts and the interrupt enable flag to be handled
by hardware even for V86 tasks.
And following-up with a more accurate answer, no, your VME does NOT
help. You have to
Eric said that too so working on it now, I got my freadln() working
right, it was only retrieving one character from file and not the whole
string, cause it to return false every time. It going to exit with users
record number as errorlevel if successful login.
Kristaps Kaupe wrote:
Well. I
Eric said that too so working on it now, I got my freadln() working
right, it was only retrieving one character from file and not the whole
string, cause it to return false every time. It going to exit with users
record number as errorlevel if successful login.
I would not like to have to
MDGNU-ish type stuff suffers from the we despise everything related to
MDMicrosoft and Not Invented Here syndromes, and its relationship with DOS
MDis often uneasy. That said, DJGPP has never given me a problem when
MDtesting recent EMM386 versions.
I never compiled anything using DJGPP,but
16 matches
Mail list logo
