On Wednesday 08 April 2009 00:53 (CEST), Blair Campbell wrote:
Maybe 1.05 is included in the watt-32 package. I would check there.
That's also some of the first things I checked out - unfortunately I didn't
found HTGET in Watt32 nor WatTCP.
Damn, I think that HTGET is cursed by some evil
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 08:21 (CEST), Mateusz Viste wrote:
That's also some of the first things I checked out - unfortunately I didn't
found HTGET in Watt32 nor WatTCP.
Hey, you're right, Blair :-)
In the doubt, I double-checked Watt32, and I found both htget.exe and htget.c
in there! It's
Hi,
some more Italian translations are available at my Italian FreeDOS page:
http://www.mariottini.net/freedos/english.html
In particular you can find the translations of DISKCOPY, MOVE, SORT and
TREE.
In the next weeks I can look at the missing programs to translate them
as well.
Can you
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 15:17 (CEST), Roberto Mariottini wrote:
In particular you can find the translations of DISKCOPY, MOVE, SORT and
TREE.
Cool, I grabed them just now :)
Can you indicate the version at the beginning of the EN file? It's
easier for me to know what is changed between
Does freedos/fat/dos store the files date and time information properly.
Perhaps we could go by newer file instead of messages. The newer
version of something may have less after some cleanup.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste-family.net wrote:
On Wednesday 08 April
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 19:59 (CEST), usul wrote:
Does freedos/fat/dos store the files date and time information properly.
Perhaps we could go by newer file instead of messages.
Definitely a bad idea. Download any translation file from my website. What
timestamps do you get? Hint: HTTP
Hi,
talking about date
what will happen to freedos(kernel stuff?) at 2038?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
Geraldo
Sapere Aude
Non ducor, duco
São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt
site: http://exdev.sf.net/
msn: geraldo_boca_at_hotmail.com
skype: geraldo-netto
icq: 145-061-456
2009/4/8
Hi,
as long as core / tool programs are in some directory in PATH,
things will be fine. For other apps, people can add a batch
into one of the directories in PATH or they can use ALIAS or
just chdir to the place to run stuff :-). Of course PATH can
differ between different DOSes and different
Hi Geraldo,
talking about date
what will happen to freedos(kernel stuff?) at 2038?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
DOS has another date handling scheme, it counts 128
years starting at 1980, so we have enough time :-).
But note that many DOS programs also decide to use
other
Hi!
It appears that any binary package installed on FreeDOS goes to /BIN.
Almost. Packages which need many files in the same BINish
directory have separate directories. This includes for
example Arachne, DOG, Emacs, Network and USB driver bags,
FBC, GhostScript, the 1.0 game collection,
Hi Jim :-))
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
Hi people!
So far, we have always used packaging sources and binaries differently (that
is, in separate packages, like memx.zip and mems.zip). I am trying to put
some effort these days into syncing some packages to make
Hi Aitor,
But then it wouldn't be compatible with the LFN that came with
Windows9X and is used in the millions of USB devices or the like, nor
with the applications that are LFN-aware (unless you'd like to rewrite
the DOS LFN API descript.ion-based...
...
I think a descript.ion file based
Hi!
FreeDOS has been using info-zip as the ZIP and UNZIP tool
ever since I can remember. And it works very nicely, so
I do not miss PKZIP either. If somebody really does miss
it, a wrapper to translate PKZIP OPTIONX into a call to
ZIP OPTIONY might be an idea, but as said, I do not think
anybody
On Wed, April 8, 2009 14:56, Adam Norton wrote:
Speaking about match menus
I remember a menu program that I used way back in the day
I was able to build a menu and each item could be a sub menu or a
program or bat file.
It was basic but simple.
Anyone remember the menus from way back
Is there a way to compress folders so they take up less space? Ideally,
I would like to be able to compress into a zip file, and still have the
OS treat it as a regular folder. As long as other OSs can view/access
the folder and its files, then any type of compression is OK.
Thanks.
-Mike
15 matches
Mail list logo
