Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-13 Thread Christian Masloch
As far as I can tell, the last commit in the SVN for the project was in 2007, so it's either abandoned, in hiatus, or going so slowly that no commits have been pushed through in the last two years. I contacted Salvo a year or so ago and he said there's still work on a new version which will

[Freedos-user] DOS-C and GPL (was Re: Whatever happened to freedos-32?)

2009-08-13 Thread Pat Villani
With respects to DOS-C, if loading non GPL drivers really did violate GPL, then it would have never been released under GPL. The comparison of drivers to OSLib is an apples and oranges comparison. A DOS loadable device driver is simply an executable that is loaded into memory that follows a

Re: [Freedos-user] DOS-C and GPL (was Re: Whatever happened to freedos -32?)

2009-08-13 Thread Bret Johnson
Pat is correct. A device driver is no different than any other executable, it just normally gets loaded via CONFIG.SYS instead of AUTOEXEC.BAT or at the command line. If a GPL OS only allowed GPL applications to run on it, it would be useless. In the DOS world, almost no programs are GPL,

Re: [Freedos-user] DOS-C and GPL (was Re: Whatever happened to freedos-32?)

2009-08-13 Thread Christian Masloch
With respects to DOS-C, if loading non GPL drivers really did violate GPL, then it would have never been released under GPL. The GPL's text is huge and complicated, if you weren't aware of a violation you might have released program X under GPL though it actually violated the license

Re: [Freedos-user] DOS-C and GPL (was Re: Whatever happened to freedos-32?)

2009-08-13 Thread Pat Villani
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Christian Maslochc...@bttr-software.de wrote: *** SNIP *** I wasn't aware Richard Stallman is a DOS internals expert. Please don't argue by showing me people which don't believe in something, rather, stay with actual facts about the kernel and device driver

Re: [Freedos-user] DOS-C and GPL (was Re: Whatever happened to freedos-32?)

2009-08-13 Thread Christian Masloch
I have simply stated our position. I thought you wanted to discuss it since you even opened up a new thread for it. Regards, Christian -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day

Re: [Freedos-user] DOS-C and GPL (was Re: Whatever happened to freedos-32?)

2009-08-13 Thread Alain Mouette
Hi, I have followed many, many discussions about iteractions of GPL, and I have read the GPL inumerous times... GPL is very clear that *derived* work has to be GPL. There is no restriction in any way for *using with* Linking with GPL software, or copying a small piece of GPL code is

Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-13 Thread King InuYasha
Wouldn't it have been smarter to request a relicense to LGPL for FreeDOS-32? That would fix his problems On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Christian Masloch c...@bttr-software.dewrote: As far as I can tell, the last commit in the SVN for the project was in 2007, so it's either abandoned,