On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
> Interesting. When I replied to the email, I did check the website links. The
> links to SF were broken with a message from SourceForge. But I just checked
> again, and things seem back to normal. So that's good! :-)
I'll be curious to see what ha
Interesting. When I replied to the email, I did check the website links.
The links to SF were broken with a message from SourceForge. But I just
checked again, and things seem back to normal. So that's good! :-)
On Jul 13, 2016 12:58 PM, "dmccunney" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Jim H
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
> That's not a good sign. SourceForge did some planned maintenance yesterday
> about noon, and things didn't go as planned. So the FreeDOS Wiki, bug
> tracker, and Subversion repo are currently offline because they are hosted
> at SourceForge.
The
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Jose Antonio Senna
wrote:
>
> I just accessed the freedos.org page, and it seems OK.
>
> However, the links that point to Sourceforge
> return the message:
> "We're sorry -- the Sourceforge site is currently in
>Disaster Recovery mode, and currently r
That's not a good sign. SourceForge did some planned maintenance yesterday
about noon, and things didn't go as planned. So the FreeDOS Wiki, bug
tracker, and Subversion repo are currently offline because they are hosted
at SourceForge.
The www website is hosted elsewhere so is unaffected.
On Jul 1
> but HX trickery isn't really "DOS"
Then Quack-64 is 100% useless and 100% off-topic here.
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which use
