Tom wrote:
>I don't think I ever got to use or try out FLTK, don't know what I'd do
>with it given FreeDOS's severe limitations on my modern hardware
This applies to FreeDOS in general. However, FreeDOS works for me on all
PCs I have available here in the family or in the office. Some have Window
> There is a free XServer and Client for DOS: Nano-X which I ported to DOS:
> https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/
> Since programming on the X11 level is not common today, you rather use
> GTK or Qt, I also ported the FLTK GUI to DOS. This GUI has far more features
> t
far more
> features
> than a single person could implement and can be used as an alternative to
> GTK.
>
> My XFDOS distro is based on FLTK for DOS.
>
> Georg
>
> > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:09:40 +0100
> > From: Eric Auer
> > Subject: Re: [Freedos-u
single person could implement and can be used as an alternative to
GTK.
My XFDOS distro is based on FLTK for DOS.
Georg
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:09:40 +0100
> From: Eric Auer
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 2.0 GUI?
> To: "Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.
> It would be interesting to see a command interpreter like
> freecom/command.com with some basic GUI elements added to it. A menu
> bar with mouse support, clock, scroll bar perhaps... Does something
> like this exist?
There are some separate DOS utilities that provide most of these functions,
t
"It would be interesting to see a command interpreter like
freecom/command.com with some basic GUI elements added to it. A menu bar
with mouse support, clock, scroll bar perhaps... Does something like this
exist?"
I have been testing an ansi enhancer called ansiplus. I have a Compaq
Armada 1700 wi
It would be interesting to see a command interpreter like
freecom/command.com with some basic GUI elements added to it. A menu bar
with mouse support, clock, scroll bar perhaps... Does something like this
exist?
I saw something similar on an Atari 800XL with a variant of SpartaDOS. At
the
Hi Thomas,
> There was, many years ago, a port of X Window from Unix to DOS, known
> as X-Appeal.
>
> One could download a crippled version or pay $199 for the full,
> working (?) version.
>
> I never tried it.
Old versions of SuSE Linux came with some X server for DOS.
However, that only allo
There was, many years ago, a port of X Window from Unix to DOS, known as
X-Appeal.
One could download a crippled version or pay $199 for the full, working (?)
version.
I never tried it.
That was in the days before broadband internet was so widely available, and one
could buy a CD Set for Linu
I should get my vp2os3 dos menu shell recompiled and working again. It
kinda looks like win95 in text mode.
--
-Chris Evans
Computer Consultant, Systems Administrator, Programmer, PC technician
Digitalatoll Solutions Group (Tawhaki Software)
Cell. : 916-612-6904 | http://www.tawhakisoft.slyip.ne
>> > Is anyone working on a functional GUI for FreeDOS? I currently use Windows
>> > 3.1 as I do consider it to be a gui and not an operating system and it is
>> > about 90 percent functional. It would be nice to have a completely open
>> > source OS though.
[...]
>>
>> There are several free open
Hi Eric,
"Windows is much more than a GUI. There are also 1000s of
programs which need Windows (even Windows 3) to function.
If you would make a new GUI for DOS, it would not allow
you to keep using all those Windows programs."
I have no problem running W31, for those programs that I still own fr
Hi Don,
> Is anyone working on a functional GUI for FreeDOS? I currently use Windows
> 3.1 as I do consider it to be a gui and not an operating system and it is
> about 90 percent functional. It would be nice to have a completely open
> source OS though.
Windows is much more than a GUI. There ar
Is anyone working on a functional GUI for FreeDOS? I currently use Windows
3.1 as I do consider it to be a gui and not an operating system and it is
about 90 percent functional. It would be nice to have a completely open
source OS though.
14 matches
Mail list logo
