Hi Brolin,
> As far as I know, you could not write a generic AC97 driver, because
> AC97 only defines a standard for audio codecs to conform to...
Good point. I just had a quick look at
/usr/src/linux-2.6.11.4-20a/sound/{oss/ac97*.?,pci/ac97/*.?}
(9k lines of C in 12 files) and it seems that muc
Eric Auer wrote:
"future DOS" - things for modern hardware and modern OS compatibility.
Examples: long file names, PCMCIA, USB (drives, mice, keyboards...),
AC97->SB16 virtual soundcard generic driver
As far as I know, you could not write a generic AC97 driver, because
AC97 only defines a
Hi Michael!
> >"soon please" - would be nice to have that soon after FreeDOS 1.0, e.g.
> > before 2.0, for example: several EMM386 / HIMEM features...
> aka, none. EMM386 is quite deliberately versioned at 2.x because it's
> moved beyond what is needed and necessary for a FreeDOS 1.0+ relea
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
Hi, I would suggest an extra column for the tables in the
post 1.0 TODO list: Level / State of the wish. Example
values:
[ http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Post_1_0_Todo ]
I seem to like the idea of the categories , although I'd personally
review what anyone puts anywhere.
Hi!
4-Окт-2005 17:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andre Tertling) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
AT> Ah! I already saw the UPX! signature but didn't find the usual header.
AT> Is the kernel using a customized upx engine?
No. But kernel image customized after upx to make it .sys-able. Bu
At 01:11 PM 10/4/2005 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
"soon please" - would be nice to have that soon after FreeDOS 1.0, e.g.
before 2.0, for example: several EMM386 / HIMEM
features
aka, none. EMM386 is quite deliberately versioned at 2.x because it's
moved beyond what is needed and necessary
Салям!
4-Окт-2005 17:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>>You can't, because kernal image along with all textial information
>> inside it is packed (by UPX).
RR> He could check sum the files and compare these with some predefined
RR> values
Ah! I already saw the UPX! signature but didn't find the usual header.
Is the kernel using a customized upx engine? At least it is UPX and no
proprietary algorithm. :) How does the data get packed at
compilation/linking time?
Regards,
Andre
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
4-Окт-2005 16:44 [EM
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
>You can't, because kernal image along with all textial information
> inside it is packed (by UPX).
He could check sum the files and compare these with some predefined
values. Of course a lot work, because he has to know nearly *every
single* kernel version for
Hi!
4-Окт-2005 16:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andre Tertling) wrote to Freedos User
Mailinglist :
AT> I am in the odd situation that I need to determine the FreeDOS version
AT> of a given bootdisk without booting it. I already found that FreeCom can
AT> display the version, but only if FreeDOS is runni
Hi everybody,
I am in the odd situation that I need to determine the FreeDOS version
of a given bootdisk without booting it. I already found that FreeCom can
display the version, but only if FreeDOS is running. So I guess it
retrieves the version information from the FreeDOS kernel. So where c
Eric Auer schreef:
Hi, I would suggest an extra column for the tables in the
post 1.0 TODO list: Level / State of the wish. Example
values:
Category "deprecated" you mean? That would mean the functions are not
implemented.
With or without commandline compatibility? (parameter accepted but no
Hi, I would suggest an extra column for the tables in the
post 1.0 TODO list: Level / State of the wish. Example
values:
[ http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Post_1_0_Todo ]
"legacy" - MS DOS had it, but nobody needs it anymore. For example:
DRIVER / DRIVPARM (for tape drives, for forcing "disk change
Michael Devore schreef:
No way I can see to discuss a page so that I can record a comment, for
example, that notes most of the remaining EMM386 option to-do list is
unnecessary, superseded, or no longer applicable. Not appropriate to
just yank them out of there unilaterally.
And pretty much
At 11:19 PM 10/3/2005 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
Hi. Just wanted to let everyone know that I've copied the Post-1.0
todo list to the FreeDOS wiki so that everyone can view and edit the
list of items. It is available at:
http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Post_1_0_Todo
No way I can see to discuss a
Many thanks, Blair.
Just one word on the list: I know what some people may be thinking of some of
the items there.
I would like to suggest that the list be used to track the features that are
not available in FreeDOS and are not to be implemented in FreeDOS in a short
time or even never (e.g. D
16 matches
Mail list logo
