Hi Pat, Bart, Mateusz, Rugxulo, others,
> I would like to thank all the folks who have worked very hard to
> produce this latest kernel. Their effort is very much appreciated by
> myself and all the people who continue to use FreeDOS in various
> applications.
>
> I am looking forward to using
Hi Ray, Bernd,
>> How was the bootdisk created?
> The included bat.
The kernel download only includes the KERNEL itself and
the "installer" tool SYS. It does not include a SHELL,
so if you run SYS (or run the bat which runs sys) then
it will copy whatever version of command.com you already
have
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
>>
> How was the bootdisk created?
The included bat. See my previous post where I described the fix.
Ray
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licen
Ray Davison schreef:
> The boot process identifies all the HDD partitions then:
> Incorrect DOS version
> Bad or missing Command Interpreter: command.com /P /E:256
> Enter .
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Ray
>
How was the bootdisk created? Are you sure it contains both the
kernel.sys and command.com
Ray Davison wrote:
> The boot process identifies all the HDD partitions then:
> Incorrect DOS version
> Bad or missing Command Interpreter: command.com /P /E:256
> Enter .
The floppy had a 2003 Command.com. The bat went looking for a copy of
command.com on the HDD and that is what it found.
The boot process identifies all the HDD partitions then:
Incorrect DOS version
Bad or missing Command Interpreter: command.com /P /E:256
Enter .
Suggestions?
Ray
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Some years ago I thought that DOS was more or less dead. So I am very
happy that there are people how continues. Many thanks, I will test it
after my final exam next week.
Bye
Flo
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:33:11 +0200, Pat Villani wrote:
> I would like to thank all the folks who have worked
I would like to thank all the folks who have worked very hard to
produce this latest kernel. Their effort is very much appreciated by
myself and all the people who continue to use FreeDOS in various
applications.
I am looking forward to using this new kernel and updating the distribution.
Pat
-
Hi!
>> Notable things: edit
>
> buggy (some PC's)
Who what where?
>> perl
>
> NOMYSO ???
There is Perl for DOS. I think even version 5.6 or newer...
> QEMU or BOCHS only (BOCHS is slower and better)
The Bochs emulator also has a nicer debugger built-in :-)
Is there a PNG viewer for F
Hi Dos386,
> Intel ICH
Pure AC97, does not attempt to support SB. Supported by
few modern DOS apps as AC97, not supported by old games.
> ES1371/1373 AKA SB128PCI/SB16PCI, EMUxxx
> (SB512/LiveAudigy), ... (MPXPLAY)
Supported by modern apps as AC97, comes with driver which
creates virtual SB, a
Thank you Eric.
Pat
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> There is a new sourceforge file release of the FreeDOS kernel:
> Version 2038 is now available with OpenWatcom 8086 FAT16 and
> FAT32 binaries and as source code download. No 386+ or Turbo C
> binaries t
> probably (correct me if I'm wrong) even more
> challenging than writing a dos kernel.
I think you're right on that. For example, Japheth writes on his site that
"HX's source code is about 100,000 lines of code", whereas the current
RxDOS kernel Assembly source code is only around 35,000 line
>> I try to ask what is going to get done in the next release or when XYZ
>> is
>> going to get fixed and I get attacked.
>
> YES, but is cloning of Windaube ME on-topic here at all ? :-D
What are you talking about? ReactOS is not about Windows Me at all,
because Windows Me is effectively part
> HX DOS Extender does support VERY basic Win32 applications, but it is
> somewhat of a hodgepodge. It's basically using the Windows NT form of
> Win32
> as its base. If that could be refitted to work with Wine DLLs then it
> would
> make a lot of the work needed go by a lot faster.
>
> Then we
> There is no reason for an MSDOS Windows replacement to be MSDOS
> compatible.
Except to run on MS-DOS as well. As said, it's Microsoft's method to write
programs such that they only run with other Microsoft programs although
there's no good reason why they shouldn't run with other vendor's p
guest schreef:
> I know about ReactOS, ReactOS is garbage right now. It will probably be
> garbage for 2-3 more years.
>
Calling a project garbage is quite severe. If it's unusable for you or
your goals, just indicate so but don't dismiss other people's efforts
into getting something nice of
"DOS386" wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation ... UIDE won't see the PCI addon
> card since it uses BIOS INT $13 to search for disks ... but
> does anything prevent UIDE from searching for IDE/ATA/SATA
> stuff using PCI BIOS, and assigning it to a "free" INT $13
> disk number specified in commandl
> I know about ReactOS, ReactOS is garbage right now. It will probably be
> garbage for 2-3 more years.
Realistically, writing a Windows 9x replacement for FreeDOS would take
years, probably more than 2 or 3 because developers are hard to find
and it's a huge project, probably (correct me if I'm
18 matches
Mail list logo