[Freedos-user] Re : Support for 4k byte sectors + TDSK

2012-02-04 Thread Bertho Grandpied
Hi, Guys! Replying to self, sort of, and Jeremy at the same time. I've been glancing thru the ram disk, TDSK, source. Internal buffer (used for init only) was provisionned for one 4K sector, but for some reason author(s) limited sector size to 2K, as specified on the driver's command line. I

Re: [Freedos-user] Best virtual machine for FreeDOS 1.2

2012-02-04 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, quick reply (as it takes too long to think things like this through, it's a complicated question), On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:17 AM, the bcpino wrote: > > I usually use VirtualBox, but as Jack said, it didn't emulate well > some old hardware. It's "mostly" fine but doesn't like UIDE. Not a su

Re: [Freedos-user] Re : Support for 4k byte sectors

2012-02-04 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Bertho Grandpied wrote: > Kenneth J. Davis wrote : > > TDSK is maintained by, IIRC, Mathias Paul - isn't Mathias on this list ? If > so I was going to ask him if he couldn't do a quick and (not so) dirty build > of the ramdisk driver with increased bytes per

Re: [Freedos-user] Best virtual machine for FreeDOS 1.2

2012-02-04 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 4-2-2012 18:17, the bcpino schreef: > Dear friends: > > I usually use VirtualBox, but as Jack said, it didn't emulate well > some old hardware. VirtualBox and VirtualPC have some flaky implementations at times indeed, unfortunately. > Which one should I use? QEMU, some VMware "gratis". QEMU

[Freedos-user] Best virtual machine for FreeDOS 1.2

2012-02-04 Thread the bcpino
Dear friends: I usually use VirtualBox, but as Jack said, it didn't emulate well some old hardware. Which one should I use? QEMU, some VMware "gratis". I need SB16 and network emulation, controlling CPU cycles (I don't want to burn my PC) Thanks in advance, BCPino Gino P.S. Please I don't wan

Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2012-02-04 Thread dmccunney
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jim Hall wrote: > On Feb 1, 2012 12:46 PM, "dmccunney" wrote: >> >> Whether this works will depend upon your BIOS.  The box I have FreeDOS >> on will boot from a USB floppy drive, but *not* from a USB stick. >> BIOS limitation.  I can't see a USB stick from FreeDOS

[Freedos-user] Re : Support for 4k byte sectors

2012-02-04 Thread Bertho Grandpied
Kenneth J. Davis wrote : "Improved support for sectors other than 512 bytes has been committed, I am still working on it, default support will still be for 512 bytes (currently not while testing).  I have tested 256, 512, 1024, and 2048 byte sectors with tdsk (currently my only way to test).  Usin

Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2012-02-04 Thread Marco Achury
El 04/02/2012 09:45 a.m., Jim Hall escribió: > > > On Feb 1, 2012 12:46 PM, "dmccunney" > wrote: > > > > Whether this works will depend upon your BIOS. The box I have FreeDOS > > on will boot from a USB floppy drive, but *not* from a USB stick. > > BIOS limitatio

Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2012-02-04 Thread Jim Hall
On Feb 1, 2012 12:46 PM, "dmccunney" wrote: > > Whether this works will depend upon your BIOS. The box I have FreeDOS > on will boot from a USB floppy drive, but *not* from a USB stick. > BIOS limitation. I can't see a USB stick from FreeDOS either, because > no driver is available that can do i

Re: [Freedos-user] Re : Support for 4k byte sectors

2012-02-04 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jeremy, Bret, Georg, others, > Improved support for sectors other than 512 bytes has been committed, > I am still working on it, default support will still be for 512 bytes > (currently not while testing). I have tested 256, 512, 1024, and 2048 > byte sectors with tdsk (currently my only way

Re: [Freedos-user] Re : Support for 4k byte sectors

2012-02-04 Thread Kenneth J. Davis
Improved support for sectors other than 512 bytes has been committed, I am still working on it, default support will still be for 512 bytes (currently not while testing). I have tested 256, 512, 1024, and 2048 byte sectors with tdsk (currently my only way to test). Using max sector size higher th