On 11/13/2017 3:34 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi again,
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
SmallerC is very standards compliant.
(Great, I swear MS Security Essentials or whatever just deleted my .ZIP, sigh!)
Just to clarify, the existing PE/EXE binaries are (IMHO,
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:58:30 -0500, Jerome Shidel wrote:
> >> Shouldn't take much.
> >
> > Correct, but if your going to calculate stuff, should be accurate.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> Also, whoever would take on doing this semi-pointless
Hi again,
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> SmallerC is very standards compliant.
> (Great, I swear MS Security Essentials or whatever just deleted my .ZIP,
> sigh!)
Just to clarify, the existing PE/EXE binaries are (IMHO, falsely)
flagged via bad
Hi,
Thanks for the help. Anything with lots of files needs special
attention (esp. due to licensing).
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Random Liegh via Freedos-user
wrote:
>
> I think I have figured out what goes where, though I'm not sure.
>
> I've only done