I see a subject line of No subject; I must have forgotten to copy the
intended subject line.
Going back to 2001, I used Enhanced Editor (EPM) in OS/2 Warp 4, but was forced
off this editor cold-turkey when the system crashed sometime during the
single-digit days of April 2001.
CHKDSK,
It would seem that is the logical solution.
I thank you all for the advice. I have compared a few editors and have
decided to start with Setedit.
I am updating a bible translation (The Concordant Literal Translation)
which I originally compiled for my BibleWorks program using UltraEdit in
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository. Currently I see
there are 6 editors there, which seem a bit too little to create a
separate category.
Mateusz, I am a fan of your FNDPKG system and I use it in Real FreeDOS
Mode. I have customized the all_cd to work perfectly on my various
On 13/03/2015 17:59, Don Flowers wrote:
Is there a reason the edit category is not
included in the fdnpkg install program or the all_cd iso?
Actually FreeDOS categories do not translate directly into FDNPKG
repositories.
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository. Currently I see
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote:
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository.
elvis 2.2 - a clone of vi/ex, the standard UNIX editor. Supports nearly
all vi/ex commands
Not to nitpick, it's still a good editor (at least in features), but
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository. Currently I see
there are 6 editors there, which seem a bit too little to create a
separate category.
Mateusz, I am a fan of your FNDPKG system and I use it in Real
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
I had actually forgotten about setedit (and have probably forgotten how to
use it as well). Is there a reason the edit category is not included in
the fdnpkg install program or the all_cd iso? I don't mind relearning
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
This is my number one request for FreeDOS 1.2/2/0.
Can we PLEASE increase the FreeDOS edit capacity to at least match the
capacity MS-DOS edit? I get so aggravated trying to open included .txt files
with various DOS
This is my number one request for FreeDOS 1.2/2/0.
Can we PLEASE increase the FreeDOS edit capacity to at least match the
capacity MS-DOS edit? I get so aggravated trying to open included .txt files
with various DOS programs only to find that the file exceeds the capacity of
FreeDOS edit.
--
Hi Dosgeek!
This is my number one request for FreeDOS 1.2/2/0.
Can we PLEASE increase the FreeDOS edit capacity to at least match the
capacity MS-DOS edit? I get so aggravated trying to open included .txt files
with various DOS programs only to find that the file exceeds the capacity of
Eric: PLEASE stop posting MULTIPLE topics in a SINGLE email. This makes
it very difficult for anyone to find reply to your posts!!! :-|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More talking about split programs, by the way: EDIT 0.7c should be
better than 0.82 in most aspects at the moment, please let me
I think I found a bug in FreeDOS edit, but I would like to see if
anyone else noticed this: When you try to save a text file on a floppy
disk that is write protected, it doesn't give any error message. The
only way I even knew that the disk was WP was that the drive made a
funny sound when
12 matches
Mail list logo
