On 03/24/2014 02:33 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 17:37 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 00:08 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> There is an
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 17:37 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 00:08 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> >> > >>There is an error in libotp's find() function which assumes tha
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 00:08 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> > >>There is an error in libotp's find() function which assumes that
>> > >>get_basedn() always returns non-NULL value. This is not true fo
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 00:08 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> > >>There is an error in libotp's find() function which assumes that
> >> > >>get_basedn() always returns non-NULL value. This is not true for at
> >> > >>least cn=Directory Manager.
>
On 02/20/2014 07:45 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered a
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
From ead3ef011667dadacfc817725179f38c05177a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathaniel McCallum
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:20:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] Fix a typo where self was omitted
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4099
---
ipalib/plu
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>There is an error in libotp's find() function which assumes that
> >>get_basedn() always returns non-NULL value. This is not true for at
> >>least cn=Directory Manager.
> >>
> >>Patch attached.
> >More fixes required, now that Thierry produced th
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 14:13 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
> >deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
> >ordered set. The set attached is order
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:33 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > >There is definitely a bug (or more) in ipa-pwd-extop in handling
> > >authentication cases.
> > Some progress
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:33 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >There is definitely a bug (or more) in ipa-pwd-extop in handling
> >authentication cases.
> Some progress on this investigation.
>
> Plugin precedence setting is broke
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
There is definitely a bug (or more) in ipa-pwd-extop in handling
authentication cases.
Some progress on this investigation.
Plugin precedence setting is broken in 389-ds. It is only set once,
before running init function provided by the plugin and d
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/17/2014 06:17 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now
On 02/17/2014 06:17 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches a
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:32 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
>>deleted, etc. So I'm
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:32 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
> >>deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patc
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
From 357cc6a40c58f3f88f8e86c5224f2c042ab974d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathaniel McCallum
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:19:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Add OTP last token plugin
This plugin prevents the deletion or deactivation of the last
vali
On patch 0001:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
index
9cb9d71a81bc1f1089017a2236b4b7b94946ed35..8ab09e92b64b6a2f31c9c25d61a7dacc9fa608e8
100644
--- a/VERSION
+++ b/VERSION
@@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ IPA_DATA_VERSION=2010061412
I
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered acco
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my pre
On 02/14/2014 12:37 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my
On 02/14/2014 01:13 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my
On 02/14/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my preferred merge
order. It also places easy to revi
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my preferred merge
order. It also places easy to revi
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my preferred merge
order. It also places easy to revi
On 02/13/2014 06:56 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my preferred merge
order. It also places easy to revi
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Through the review process, patches are getting shifted around, added,
deleted, etc. So I'm now just going to be posting all the patches as an
ordered set. The set attached is ordered according to my preferred merge
order. It also places easy to revi
31 matches
Mail list logo
