David O'Brien wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 05:50 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Add some documentation to the migrate-ds command.
rob
Ack
pushed to master
Apologies for the late review; I've been off sick for
Jan Zelený wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
The Managed Entries plugin will allow a user to be added even if a group
of the same name exists. This would leave the user without a private group.
We need to check for both the user and the group so we can do 1 of 3
things: - throw
Jan Zelený wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
permissions are a real group pointed to by an aci, managed by the same
plugin. Any given update can update one or both or neither. Do a better
job at determining what it is that needs to be updated and handle the
case where only the
Jan Zeleny wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Jan Zelený wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Give the memberof plugin time to work when adding/removing reverse
members.
When we add/remove reverse members it looks like we're operating on
group A but we're really
David O'Brien wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 12/11/2010 10:41 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:01 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Hi,
I installed today build. I can get to the static frame with green
line
and rigt user name which indicates that I actually connected and
Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
Dmitri,
While I don't expect you to do the review of the patch, I would
appreciate at least a visual inspection of the completed UI. Since
there seems to be something wrong with the install/UI right now, I've
posed the lates on my Fedora People page.
Lets walk through it tomorrow when I am in the office.
On 12/13/2010 11:05 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
Dmitri,
While I don't expect you to do the review of the patch, I would
appreciate at least a visual inspection of the completed UI. Since
there seems to be something
This depends on my patch 0116.
Something not mentioned in the commit message is that this also fixes
the 'filter only' options.
From c676e7a85fc679307a4639b8328a2230984eebe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] aci
Attached are patches to address:
(https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/570)
5) -The UI needs separate run-as-user and run-as-group categories for
the As Whom section. The UI also needs a way to manage the list of
users/groups for the run-as-user, and the list of groups for the
run-as-group.
On 12/13/2010 11:05 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
Dmitri,
While I don't expect you to do the review of the patch, I would
appreciate at least a visual inspection of the completed UI. Since
there seems to be something wrong with the install/UI right now, I've
posed the lates on
Move a bunch of objects created by the updater into the bootstrap ldif.
It is cleaner to do it this way (and probably a bit faster too).
rob
From 4094295ade03897b62f14b1b5ff4a59227fadf1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:23:04 -0500
In addition to the issues I explain above here is what I also noticed:
1) As we mentioned there is no Description in ACI. The description and
name is the same field for ACI.
Description is in the Meta data, and gets returned with ipa
permission_show, role_show, and privilege_show
May
On 12/13/2010 01:28 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
In addition to the issues I explain above here is what I also noticed:
1) As we mentioned there is no Description in ACI. The description and
name is the same field for ACI.
Description is in the Meta data, and gets returned with ipa
Ensure that the replication plugin exists before creeating or installing
a replica.
ticket 502
rob
From 5c751cd54b203e92db9e9d0f77f4147f717cf27b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:28:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Verify that the replication
On 12/13/2010 11:27 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Sorry this whole part just does not make sense to me. What is the target
group? Where it came from?
One ACI that uses this is 'add_user_to_default_group. This is used in
the permission 'useradmin'.
The json response for permission-show
Adam Young wrote:
On 12/13/2010 11:27 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Sorry this whole part just does not make sense to me. What is the target
group? Where it came from?
One ACI that uses this is 'add_user_to_default_group. This is used in
the permission 'useradmin'.
The json response for
JR Aquino wrote:
Attached are patches to address:
(https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/570)
5) -The UI needs separate run-as-user and run-as-group categories for
the As Whom section. The UI also needs a way to manage the list of
users/groups for the run-as-user, and the list of groups
JR Aquino wrote:
On 12/10/10 12:49 PM, Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
nack, found a couple of minor issues:
- The patch doesn't apply against the master branch (probably from
Simo's recent changes there)
- looks like you copied the man page from ipa-ldap-updater, needs a few
more
Jan Zelený wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Jan Zeleny wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Jan Zelený wrote:
Rob Crittendenrcrit...@redhat.comwrote:
Give the memberof plugin time to work when adding/removing reverse
members.
When we add/remove reverse
On 12/10/2010 01:36 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Round out our trio of access control plugins. This adds group to group
delegation where you can grant group A the ability to write a set of
attributes of group B (v1-style delegation).
rob
I'm
20 matches
Mail list logo
