We plan to do an alpha build of Dogtag 10.2 on Fedora 21 at the end of
this week.
Ade
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:14 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/22/2014 03:28 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> [...]
> > Should the requirement of Dogtag 10.2 be reflected in a spec file?
>
>
> Yes. Sorry for forget
On 08/22/2014 03:28 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
[...]
Should the requirement of Dogtag 10.2 be reflected in a spec file?
Yes. Sorry for forgetting that point in he review.
We can do two things here:
1) Require Dogtag 10.2 (and ask developers to add the vakwetu-dogtag
repo for ipa master)
or
2)
On 22.8.2014 10:03, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/21/2014 10:53 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 21:52 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 08/21/2014 05:27 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/21/2014 03:48 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
As agreed on #irc, disabling uninstallation for now.
Please apply this new
On 08/21/2014 10:53 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 21:52 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 08/21/2014 05:27 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/21/2014 03:48 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
As agreed on #irc, disabling uninstallation for now.
Please apply this new patch on top of the big one.
I'm fine
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 21:52 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 05:27 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 08/21/2014 03:48 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
> >> As agreed on #irc, disabling uninstallation for now.
> >> Please apply this new patch on top of the big one.
> >
> >
> > I'm fine with pushing a patc
On 08/21/2014 05:27 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/21/2014 03:48 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
As agreed on #irc, disabling uninstallation for now.
Please apply this new patch on top of the big one.
I'm fine with pushing a patch with incomplete functionality, after all I did
this all the time with permi
On 08/21/2014 03:48 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
As agreed on #irc, disabling uninstallation for now.
Please apply this new patch on top of the big one.
I'm fine with pushing a patch with incomplete functionality, after all I
did this all the time with permissions.
The incomplete parts (apart from th
As agreed on #irc, disabling uninstallation for now.
Please apply this new patch on top of the big one.
Ade
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 01:15 -0400, Ade Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 15:35 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > Ade Lee wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 14:29 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 08/20/2014 09:35 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
[...]
I'm kinda with Petr, I don't know that an uninstall option is needed.
On a single master install I successfully did a kra install, uninstall,
re-install, so maybe the issue that Petr saw was related to cloning.
Yes, on a single master it work
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 15:35 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Ade Lee wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 14:29 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> >> On 08/14/2014 10:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 08/13/2014 09:54 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
> In Dogtag, we have decided to revert the name of the DRM to the
Ade Lee wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 14:29 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> On 08/14/2014 10:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 08/13/2014 09:54 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
In Dogtag, we have decided to revert the name of the DRM to the old name
KRA.
DRM was really only used in docs/marketing
On 08/18/2014 07:36 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
[...]
After discussion with Endi, I also removed some functions in dogtag.py
(the plugin) which basically just wrapped calls to the keyclient. There
is no need to do this wrapping and it is much more flexible for IPA code
to call the keyclient directly. A
On 08/14/2014 10:53 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 08/13/2014 09:54 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
In Dogtag, we have decided to revert the name of the DRM to the old name KRA.
DRM was really only used in docs/marketing, whereas KRA is all over the code.
Soon, the code and the marketing/docs will match.
The fo
On 08/13/2014 09:54 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
> In Dogtag, we have decided to revert the name of the DRM to the old name KRA.
> DRM was really only used in docs/marketing, whereas KRA is all over the code.
> Soon, the code and the marketing/docs will match.
>
> The following patch changes all references
PM
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] - Add DRM to IPA
New patch attached which all the issues noted below. Rebased to master.
Please review,
Thanks,
Ade
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/09/2014 01:36 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > Ade Lee wrote:
> >
On 08/09/2014 01:36 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Ade Lee wrote:
Attached is a new patch. I believe I have addressed all the issues
raided by pviktori, edewata and rcrit.
Ar!
Please let me know if I missed something!
Incidentally, to get all this to work, you should use the latest Dogtag
10.
Ade Lee wrote:
> Attached is a new patch. I believe I have addressed all the issues
> raided by pviktori, edewata and rcrit.
>
> Please let me know if I missed something!
>
> Incidentally, to get all this to work, you should use the latest Dogtag
> 10.2 build, which also contains a fix for pkide
Ade Lee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have rebased all the previous patches against master, and have squashed
> them all into a single patch.
> Its a large patch, but as many folks have already reviewed the constituent
> precursor patches, most if it
> should be familiar and easier to review.
>
> The
On 07/16/2014 02:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 07/14/2014 11:45 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Hi all,
I have rebased all the previous patches against master, and have
squashed them all into a single patch.
Its a large patch, but as many folks have already reviewed the
constituent precursor patches, most
On 7/14/2014 4:45 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Hi all,
I have rebased all the previous patches against master, and have squashed them
all into a single patch.
Its a large patch, but as many folks have already reviewed the constituent
precursor patches, most if it
should be familiar and easier to review.
On 07/14/2014 11:45 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Hi all,
I have rebased all the previous patches against master, and have squashed them
all into a single patch.
Its a large patch, but as many folks have already reviewed the constituent
precursor patches, most if it
should be familiar and easier to revie
Ade Lee wrote:
Attached is a patch that adds the script ipa-drm-install.
This script will be used to install a drm in any ipa server that
contains a Dogtag CA. Right now, it works for a master. I will add
logic in a subsequent patch to allow the installation on a replica using
the same script.
- Original Message -
> Attached is a patch that adds the script ipa-drm-install.
>
> This script will be used to install a drm in any ipa server that
> contains a Dogtag CA. Right now, it works for a master. I will add
> logic in a subsequent patch to allow the installation on a replica
Attached is a patch that adds the script ipa-drm-install.
This script will be used to install a drm in any ipa server that
contains a Dogtag CA. Right now, it works for a master. I will add
logic in a subsequent patch to allow the installation on a replica using
the same script.
This patch is t
Ade Lee wrote:
Attached a new patch to address some of the concerns below, specifically
I created a new base class DogtagInstance, in which much of the common
CA/KRA code is placed. I'm sure we could go further in reducing
duplication, and I'm open to further suggestions and refinements.
I did
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 09:52 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 04/07/2014 10:40 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >> Ade Lee wrote:
> >>> This patch adds the capability of installing a Dogtag DRM
> >>> to an IPA instance. With this patch, when ipa-server-install
> >>>
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/07/2014 10:40 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Ade Lee wrote:
This patch adds the capability of installing a Dogtag DRM
to an IPA instance. With this patch, when ipa-server-install
is run, a Dogtag CA and a Dogtag DRM are created. The DRM
shares the
On 04/07/2014 10:40 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Ade Lee wrote:
>> This patch adds the capability of installing a Dogtag DRM
>> to an IPA instance. With this patch, when ipa-server-install
>> is run, a Dogtag CA and a Dogtag DRM are created. The DRM
>> shares the same tomcat in
Ade Lee wrote:
This patch adds the capability of installing a Dogtag DRM
to an IPA instance. With this patch, when ipa-server-install
is run, a Dogtag CA and a Dogtag DRM are created. The DRM
shares the same tomcat instance and DS instance as the Dogtag CA.
Moreover, th
Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 04/04/2014 02:50 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
This patch adds the capability of installing a Dogtag DRM
to an IPA instance. With this patch, when ipa-server-install
is run, a Dogtag CA and a Dogtag DRM are created. The DRM
shares the same tomcat instance and DS i
On 04/04/2014 02:50 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
This patch adds the capability of installing a Dogtag DRM
to an IPA instance. With this patch, when ipa-server-install
is run, a Dogtag CA and a Dogtag DRM are created. The DRM
shares the same tomcat instance and DS instance as the Dogt
31 matches
Mail list logo