On 08/03/2015 04:30 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
snip
3. The mockups for HBAC time policies show quite a wizard-like UI.
While I might be very wrong here, I was thinking of rather a simple
UI where user would be able to set the values for each
On 08/03/2015 04:30 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
dragons may appear, although with a tiny tiny possibility of a
golden treasure in the end.
Yes, I think intervals are required.
Alright. I gave it a little thought considering the current state of
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
dragons may appear, although with a tiny tiny possibility of a
golden treasure in the end.
Yes, I think intervals are required.
Alright. I gave it a little thought considering the current state of
the language for time rules and considering where
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
I have made some changes to the structure of the HBAC time rules
extension, namely the code that validates the time rules' strings was
moved from the ipalib/parameters to the hbacrule module itself, and a
more fresh approach was used in code
On 08/03/2015 11:45 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
I have made some changes to the structure of the HBAC time rules
extension, namely the code that validates the time rules' strings was
moved from the ipalib/parameters to the hbacrule module
On 07/10/2015 04:17 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/07/15 12:08, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time
policies for HBAC rules on FreeIPA and SSSD sides. Attached is the
current
On 07/10/2015 12:43 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
Welcome back!
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time
policies for HBAC rules on FreeIPA and SSSD sides.
On 07/10/2015 01:10 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/10/2015 12:43 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
Welcome back!
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time
policies
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
Welcome back!
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time policies
for HBAC rules on FreeIPA and SSSD sides. Attached is the current state of
the FreeIPA
On 07/10/2015 01:12 PM, Matúš Honěk wrote:
On 07/10/2015 12:43 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
Welcome back!
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time
policies
On 07/10/2015 12:43 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
Welcome back!
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time
policies for HBAC rules on FreeIPA and SSSD sides.
On 10/07/15 12:08, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hi,
Long time no post from me, time to make it up to you.
I have been working on the the implementation of the design of time
policies for HBAC rules on FreeIPA and SSSD sides. Attached is the
current state of the FreeIPA solution. My comments and
Hi,
Dne 15.4.2015 v 16:07 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
Hi,
I have prepared a feature proposal for the wiki. I followed the Feature
Proposal Template and the chapter How to Test is currently missing so
it might rather be considered a draft. Please, see it, I hope it's alright.
The text:
On 4/16/2015 10:26 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
On 04/16/2015 08:04 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 15.4.2015 v 16:07 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
Hi,
I have prepared a feature proposal for the wiki. I followed the
Feature
Proposal Template
On 04/16/2015 08:04 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 15.4.2015 v 16:07 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
Hi,
I have prepared a feature proposal for the wiki. I followed the Feature
Proposal Template and the chapter How to Test is currently missing so
it might rather be considered a draft. Please,
Dne 16.4.2015 v 10:04 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 04/16/2015 08:04 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 15.4.2015 v 16:07 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
Hi,
I have prepared a feature proposal for the wiki. I followed the Feature
Proposal Template and the chapter How to Test is currently
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
On 04/16/2015 08:04 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 15.4.2015 v 16:07 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
Hi,
I have prepared a feature proposal for the wiki. I followed the Feature
Proposal Template and the chapter How to Test is currently missing so
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 10:04 +0200, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
Possible values of each keyword:
timeofday -2359
dayofweek Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat, Sun
dayofmonth 1-31
weekofmonth 1-5
monthofyear Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct,
Nov,
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 10:04 +0200, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
Possible values of each keyword:
timeofday -2359
dayofweek Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat, Sun
dayofmonth 1-31
weekofmonth 1-5
monthofyear Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr,
Dne 24.3.2015 v 19:20 Simo Sorce napsal(a):
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 08:40 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/25/2015 12:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
When using hbactest command you just need to supply implied time zone
as an option to the command itself. After all, you are simulating rule
execution so it does not matter where the value comes
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/25/2015 12:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
When using hbactest command you just need to supply implied time zone
as an option to the command itself. After all, you are simulating rule
execution
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/25/2015 12:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
When using hbactest command you just need to supply implied time zone
as an option to the command
On 03/26/2015 05:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:47 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
Reference:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2015-March/msg00158.html
I see how the language I sued may be confusing. But I was pointing out
only that you can't just do one or the
On 03/26/2015 04:57 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 26.3.2015 v 16:47 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/26/2015 04:39 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:35 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:26 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
[...]
I don't see any point in storing time zone in the host
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:47 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:39 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:35 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:26 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
[...]
I don't see any point in storing time zone in the host object, if it's
not used
On 3/26/2015 1:24 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/25/2015 12:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
When using hbactest command you just need to supply implied
On 03/26/2015 02:40 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 1:24 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/25/2015 12:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
When using
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:35 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:26 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
[...]
I don't see any point in storing time zone in the host object, if it's not
used
for anything meaningful and has to be manually synchronized with the host's
actual configured time
On 03/26/2015 04:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:26 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
I think the timezone still may be with the host object but only as
the UI
helper as you suggest. Although I would maybe rather not see it
with the object
at all and have the admin just set the
On 03/26/2015 04:39 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:35 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:26 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
[...]
I don't see any point in storing time zone in the host object, if it's not
used
for anything meaningful and has to be manually synchronized
Dne 26.3.2015 v 16:47 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/26/2015 04:39 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:35 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:26 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
[...]
I don't see any point in storing time zone in the host object, if it's not used
for anything
On 03/26/2015 04:26 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 26.3.2015 v 14:55 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/26/2015 02:40 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 1:24 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25
On 26. 3. 2015, at 14:55, Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/26/2015 02:40 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 1:24 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:39 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:26 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
I think the timezone still may be with the host object but only as
the UI
helper as you suggest. Although I would maybe rather not see it
Dne 26.3.2015 v 14:55 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/26/2015 02:40 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 1:24 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Standa Láznička wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:13 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 25.3.2015 v 18:25 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/25/2015
On 03/26/2015 04:42 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:39 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/26/2015 04:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:26 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
I think the timezone still may be with the host object but only as
the UI
helper as you suggest.
Dne 24.3.2015 v 18:08 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 08:40 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 03/25/2015 12:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
When using hbactest command you just need to supply implied time zone
as an option to the command itself. After all, you are simulating rule
execution so it does not matter where the value comes from.
Oh, good, I haven't thought of that. That
On 03/25/2015 12:09 PM, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
On 03/25/2015 08:21 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 18:08 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 08:40 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
On 03/25/2015 08:21 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 18:08 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 08:40 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar
On 03/25/2015 08:21 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 18:08 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 08:40 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 08:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 24.3.2015 v 08:40 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
On 3/23/2015 10:10 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 20.3.2015 v 13:30 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
...
As for the local time - timezone in the tuple (time, timezone) would
only say Local Time, which can't be found in Olson's and it means the
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
On 3/23/2015 10:10 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 20.3.2015 v 13:30 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
...
As for the local time - timezone in the tuple (time, timezone) would
only say Local Time, which
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
...
Given the above, HBAC rules could contain (time, anchor), where anchor
is UTC, user local time or host local time.
Truth is, it was not really clear to me from the last week's discussion
whose
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 08:40 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
...
Given the above, HBAC rules
On 24.3.2015 08:20, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
...
Given the above, HBAC rules could contain (time, anchor), where anchor
is UTC, user local
Dne 24.3.2015 v 08:40 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
...
Given the above, HBAC rules could contain
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
...
Given the above, HBAC rules could contain (time, anchor), where anchor
is UTC, user local time or host local time.
Truth is, it
On 03/24/2015 08:20 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/24/2015 07:16 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 23.3.2015 v 20:17 Standa Láznička napsal(a):
...
Given the above, HBAC rules could contain (time, anchor), where anchor
is UTC, user local
On 3/23/2015 10:10 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 20.3.2015 v 13:30 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
...
As for the local time - timezone in the tuple (time, timezone) would
only say Local Time, which can't be found in Olson's and it means the
time record from the tuple should be compared to
Hi,
Dne 20.3.2015 v 13:30 Stanislav Láznička napsal(a):
Hi!
I went through the last week's thread on Time-Based Policies, discussed
some parts I wasn't very sure about with Martin, and would like to make
a summary of it, followed by some further questions on the topic. The
mail is a bit longer
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, John Dennis wrote:
On 03/10/2015 12:56 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
See my answer to John. We don't need to end up with iCal at all since
iCal doesn't have procedural definitions of holidays. It has
EXDATE/RRULE allowing to express exceptions and repeating rules (EXRULE
for
On 03/10/2015 03:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 09:05 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 22:02 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 09:05 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 22:02 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
...
For some tasks 'local' is the only thing that makes sense (your
morning alarm
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 09:05 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 22:02 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
...
For some tasks 'local' is the only thing that
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:00 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 07:22 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin
On 03/09/2015 09:05 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 22:02 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
...
For some tasks 'local' is the only thing that makes sense (your
morning alarm clock), for other things 'UTC' is the only thing
that make
On 03/09/2015 07:22 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
One of bigger issues we had was lack of
On 03/10/2015 04:06 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
This is where importing iCal is helpful because it allows you to
outsource the task of creating such event to something else.
Parsing event information would produce a rule definition we
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/10/2015 05:18 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, John Dennis wrote:
On 03/10/2015 11:06 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
We may need to use libraries for processing iCal rules, like libical
On 03/10/2015 05:18 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, John Dennis wrote:
On 03/10/2015 11:06 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
We may need to use libraries for processing iCal rules, like libical
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=606329)...
Is that what Alexander
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
On 03/10/2015 04:06 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
This is where importing iCal is helpful because it allows you to
outsource the task of creating such event to something else.
Parsing event
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Gabe Alford wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Stanislav Láznička s...@seznam.cz wrote:
On 03/10/2015 04:06 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
This is where importing iCal is helpful because it allows you to
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
This is where importing iCal is helpful because it allows you to
outsource the task of creating such event to something else.
Parsing event information would produce a rule definition we would store
and SSSD would apply as
On 03/10/2015 12:13 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
HBAC rule is a tuple (user|group, host|hostgroup, service|servicegroup).
This tuple would get extension representing time/date information in a
multivalued attribute that would describe all time/date intervals
applicable to this rule.
I must be
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, John Dennis wrote:
On 03/10/2015 12:13 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
HBAC rule is a tuple (user|group, host|hostgroup, service|servicegroup).
This tuple would get extension representing time/date information in a
multivalued attribute that would describe all time/date
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/10/2015 03:34 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 09:05 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 22:02 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Stanislav Láznička s...@seznam.cz wrote:
On 03/10/2015 04:06 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
This is where importing iCal is helpful because it allows you to
outsource the task of creating such event to
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, John Dennis wrote:
On 03/10/2015 11:06 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
We may need to use libraries for processing iCal rules, like libical
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=606329)...
Is that what Alexander said, though? In his reply, I see:
Parsing event
On 03/10/2015 12:56 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
See my answer to John. We don't need to end up with iCal at all since
iCal doesn't have procedural definitions of holidays. It has
EXDATE/RRULE allowing to express exceptions and repeating rules (EXRULE
for exception rules was removed in RFC5545
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 08:00 +0100, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
Hi!
My name is Stanislav Laznicka and I am a student at Brno University
of Technology. As a part of my Master's thesis, I am supposed to
design and
implement time-based account policies extensions for FreeIPA and
SSSD.
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 02:02 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 08:00 +0100, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
Hi!
My name is Stanislav Laznicka and I am a student at Brno University
of Technology. As a part of my Master's thesis, I am supposed to
On 03/09/2015 02:02 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 08:00 +0100, Stanislav Láznička wrote:
Hi!
My name is Stanislav Laznicka and I am a student at Brno University
of Technology. As a part of my Master's thesis, I am supposed to
design and
implement time-based account
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
One of bigger issues we had was lack of versatile ical format parser to
handle calendar-like specification of events -- we need to allow
importing these ones
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
One of bigger issues we had was lack of versatile ical format parser to
handle calendar-like specification of events -- we need to allow
importing these ones instead of inventing our own.
Good point.
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
One of bigger issues we had was lack of versatile ical format parser to
handle calendar-like
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 16:17 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
We've been through this a few times already, it just doesn't work.
At a minimum you need to be able to select between UTC and Local Time
and it is a rathole down there (What time is it *here* may
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:55 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:22 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:13 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
One of bigger issues we had was lack of versatile ical format parser to
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 22:02 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:55 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:22 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar
On 03/09/2015 03:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
We've been through this a few times already, it just doesn't work.
At a minimum you need to be able to select between UTC and Local Time
and it is a rathole down there (What time is it *here* may be a hard
question to answer :-/)
O.K. I'll bite,
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:22 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
One of bigger issues we
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:22 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/09/2015 03:58 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Martin
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:55 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 20:22 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:08:46PM +0100,
86 matches
Mail list logo
