On 06/02/2014 12:19 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 03:32 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> On 30.5.2014 15:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>> On 05/30/2014 08:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-
On 05/30/2014 03:32 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 30.5.2014 15:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 05/30/2014 08:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM,
Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 08:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Ma
On 30.5.2014 15:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 05/30/2014 08:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Ma
On 05/30/2014 09:24 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 05/30/2014 08:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM
On 05/30/2014 08:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM,
On 05/30/2014 02:37 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM,
On 05/29/2014 08:14 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Fr
On 05/29/2014 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I be
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:06 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > Let me try to consolidate again the proposals and changes for the
> > workflow&API
> > we have so far:
> >
> > 1) Manipulating staged users
> > - staged users must have UID RDN
> > - UID uniqueness plugin should not be enforcing in stagin
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> This, I believe, has already been c
On 05/29/2014 10:06 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 09:43 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
>> 1) Manipulating staged users
>> - staged users must have UID RDN
>> - UID uniqueness plugin should not be enforcing in staging area
>> - we do not want it in user plugin as it requires different parame
On 29.5.2014 09:43, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with th
On 05/29/2014 09:43 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned wit
On 05/29/2014 05:31 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the
(over)use of active/inact
On 05/26/2014 01:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the
(over)use of active/inactive in this discussion.
I think use of "inactive" and "a
On 05/23/2014 01:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:47 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
About membership. I think it could be risky to keep membership in
'delete' or 'stage'. Those entries are not valid user and should not
belong to any active group. Should we keep membership attribut
On 26.5.2014 10:18, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2014 09:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 26.5.2014 07:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
> 5) modifying
> (in active) ipa user-mod tuser ...
Ok.
> (in stage)ipa user-mod tuser --staged ...
Simo did not like this command, I would personally
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2014 09:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 26.5.2014 07:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
> 5) modifying
> (in active) ipa user-mod tuser ...
Ok.
> (in stage)ipa user-mod tuser --staged ...
Simo did not like this command, I would personally ad
On 05/26/2014 10:18 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2014 09:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 26.5.2014 07:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
> 5) modifying
> (in active) ipa user-mod tuser ...
Ok.
> (in stage)ipa user-mod tuser --staged ...
Simo did not like this command, I would persona
On 05/26/2014 09:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 26.5.2014 07:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
>> > 5) modifying
>> > (in active) ipa user-mod tuser ...
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> > (in stage)ipa user-mod tuser --staged ...
>>
>> Simo did not like this command, I would personally add it. As long as we
>>
On 05/26/2014 07:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the
(over)use of active/inactive in this discussion.
I think use of "inactive" and "a
On 26.5.2014 07:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the
(over)use of active/inactive in this discussion.
I think use of "inactive" and "activ
On 05/23/2014 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the
(over)use of active/inactive in this discussion.
I think use of "inactive" and "active" to describe users might be
confusing s
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:47 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> About membership. I think it could be risky to keep membership in
> 'delete' or 'stage'. Those entries are not valid user and should not
> belong to any active group. Should we keep membership attributes in
> those state or let the plugi
On 05/23/2014 10:13 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:33 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 07:48 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM,
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the
> (over)use of active/inactive in this discussion.
>
> I think use of "inactive" and "active" to describe users might be
> confusing since there is already an account en
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:33 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 07:48 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrot
Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 07:48 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo
On 23.5.2014 10:13, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 05/23/2014 08:33 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 07:48 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Mart
On 05/23/2014 08:33 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/23/2014 07:48 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, S
On 05/23/2014 07:48 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Wed,
On 22.5.2014 19:27, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks fo
On 05/21/2014 10:11 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for all these detailed descriptions.
Just to be sure to be on
On 05/21/2014 09:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for all these detailed descriptions.
Just to be sure to be on the same page, here is my
understanding of
the provisionin
On 05/21/2014 03:06 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for all these detailed descriptions.
Just to be sure to be on the same page, here is my
understanding of
the provisionin
On 05/21/2014 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for all these detailed descriptions.
Just to be sure to be on the same page, here is my understanding of
the provisioning templates and placeholder definitions. An
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 16:01 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for all these detailed descriptions.
> Just to be sure to be on the same page, here is my understanding of
> the provisioning templates and placeholder definitions. An
> administrator can provide a provisi
On 05/20/2014 10:30 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
I am sharing the question below with the list as I think the
information is useful and relevant for everyone interested in this
feature. See answers in the text.
On 05/20/2014 06:26 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello Martin, Petr,
I implemented 'u
I am sharing the question below with the list as I think the information is
useful and relevant for everyone interested in this feature. See answers in the
text.
On 05/20/2014 06:26 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello Martin, Petr,
I implemented 'user-add --to-stage' in a very simple way. Bas
41 matches
Mail list logo
