HiI have multiple domains her but I want to use one user/group etc. database. How can I do it? Options:1. Different realm for each domain, but how to share the user/group etc infos betwen different ipa servers?2. One realm for al domains. Possible? (it is possible to change the realm after
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force --hostname=kelvin-c5.dnsdomainname
and successfully bound to the domain.
I am now trying to get nfs4 up and
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force --hostname=kelvin-c5.dnsdomainname
and successfully bound to the domain.
I am now
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what
looks to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force
On 2012-04-13, at 1:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what
looks to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to add/remove replicas many times - and run into
problems installing
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to add/remove replicas many
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:43, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm convinced that my LDAP directories contain lots of cruft which has
built up and is causing problems on my system. There may even be some
corruption since there's an entry which
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 13:39 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to
On 04/13/2012 12:22 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:43, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm convinced that my LDAP directories contain lots of cruft which has
built up and is causing problems on my system. There may even be
Thanks for the quick response.
Simo: Thanks - I'd prefer to clean it up properly rather than start
from scratch. I haven't changed the LDAP schema at all. All I've done
is the use the IPA tools for user admin and add/remove replicas.
I just felt like I've been emailing this list once a week or
Has anyone worked any magic to keep DNS, kerberos and LDAP request routed to
local servers in an IPA setup where topology is separated by WAN links?
I have looked at things like doing sorts in the DNS client configuration, BIND
views, etc. but I would like to know if anyone else has tried to
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
Simo: Thanks - I'd prefer to clean it up properly rather than start
from scratch. I haven't changed the LDAP schema at all. All I've done
is the use the IPA tools for user admin and add/remove replicas.
I just felt like
Brian Cook wrote:
Has anyone worked any magic to keep DNS, kerberos and LDAP request
routed to local servers in an IPA setup where topology is separated by
WAN links?
I have looked at things like doing sorts in the DNS client
configuration, BIND views, etc. but I would like to know if anyone
Ideally I would rely on a -group- of servers, and then rely on DNS if it is
down. I don't want to hammer one server. We're talking about 500-1000 servers
running virtual machines, so potentially a lot of traffic. Got any suggestions
for that?
---
Brian Cook
Solutions Architect, Red Hat,
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:04:55PM -0700, Brian Cook wrote:
Ideally I would rely on a -group- of servers, and then rely on DNS if it
is down. I don't want to hammer one server. We're talking about 500-1000
servers running virtual machines, so potentially a lot of traffic. Got
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it can't be deleted because it's
not a leaf node, but it doesn't have any sub-entries that I can delete
first.
You are correct. Try this:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it can't be deleted because it's
not a leaf node, but it doesn't have any sub-entries that I can delete
On 2012-04-13, at 4:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:41, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
It's not a problem until it's a problem :-) I would go ahead and run
CLEANRUV.
I cleaned up a load of
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:41, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.comwrote:
It's not a problem until it's a problem :-) I would go ahead
23 matches
Mail list logo
