On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 21:16 -0400, Coy Hile wrote:
In MIT land, one can potentially have multiple instances tied (by
convention) to a given user (that is, that administratively one knows
are the same set of eyeballs). For example, I might have my normal
user (hile), and I might have another
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 14:16 +, coy.h...@coyhile.com wrote:
Quoting Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 21:16 -0400, Coy Hile wrote:
In MIT land, one can potentially have multiple instances tied (by
convention) to a given user (that is, that administratively one knows
.
Does that question make more sense?
Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com
Date:04/07/2015 08:52 (GMT-05:00)
To: coy.h...@coyhile.com
Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Creating
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:54 +, Coy Hile wrote:
Quoting Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
I guess that makes sense. Is it possible to add a user that simply
doesn't have the posix attributes defined? In the particular case of
*/admin, I would expect that user to login to the ipa ui or
Quoting Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
I guess that makes sense. Is it possible to add a user that simply
doesn't have the posix attributes defined? In the particular case of
*/admin, I would expect that user to login to the ipa ui or to be
kinit'd to prior to running ipa administrative
On 04/07/2015 10:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 14:16 +, coy.h...@coyhile.com wrote:
Quoting Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 21:16 -0400, Coy Hile wrote:
In MIT land, one can potentially have multiple instances tied (by
convention) to a given user (that
On Apr 7, 2015, at 2:58 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:54 +, Coy Hile wrote:
Quoting Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
I guess that makes sense. Is it possible to add a user that simply
doesn't have the posix attributes defined? In the particular case
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 22:01 -0400, Coy Hile wrote:
On Apr 7, 2015, at 2:58 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:54 +, Coy Hile wrote:
Quoting Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
I guess that makes sense. Is it possible to add a user that simply
doesn't
In MIT land, one can potentially have multiple instances tied (by convention)
to a given user (that is, that administratively one knows are the same set of
eyeballs). For example, I might have my normal user (hile), and I might have
another distinct MIT principal hile/admin used when I’m doing
