Hi guys,
I'm working on Fedora16 and FreeIPA 2.1.4.
I executed the command ipa-server-install and during the setup digging in
the logs i can find this error, related to SELinux.
I'm running in Permissive mode, so nothing prevented me to successfully
complete my setup.
Is this an error in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marco
I had a very similar issue trying to do the same thing a while back on
the day RHEL 6.2 went GA..
My situation was
SElinux enforcing, then run ipa-server-install.. it gets half way
through the process and it fails
then I tried
SELinux
Hi Dale,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Dale Macartney
d...@themacartneyclan.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marco
I had a very similar issue trying to do the same thing a while back on the
day RHEL 6.2 went GA..
My situation was
SElinux enforcing, then
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm working on Fedora16 and FreeIPA 2.1.4.
I executed the command ipa-server-install and during the setup digging in
the logs i can find this error, related to SELinux.
I'm running in Permissive mode, so nothing prevented me to successfully
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Alexander Bokovoy aboko...@redhat.comwrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm working on Fedora16 and FreeIPA 2.1.4.
I executed the command ipa-server-install and during the setup digging in
the logs i can find this
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 17:01 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
This may be related to https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/273 and
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/274 which have been fixed in
1.2.10
In this case Ian please open a bugzilla, it looks like we need to
address this in RHEL6.
Simo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All
I have added a walk through on configuring Dovecot to use IMAPS with SSO
support to the Wiki.
http://freeipa.org/page/Dovecot_IMAPS_Integration_with_FreeIPA_using_Single_Sign_On
Feed back is more than welcome
Dale
-BEGIN PGP
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:50 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Dmitri Pal d...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/30/2012 09:47 AM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi guys,
Next days I'm going to start a test deployment of FreeIPA
2.1 but the
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:30 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:50 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Dmitri Pal
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:30 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:50 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Dmitri
On 02/10/2012 04:01 AM, David Juran wrote:
Hello
I wonder if it's somehow possible to sync AD-users more selectively then
just by sub-tree. In my case, I'm dealing with a very large organisation
where the users that are to be synced to IPA aren't grouped by a subtree
in AD but rather spread
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:30 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:50 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com
mailto:rcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:30 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
On 02/10/2012 11:41 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2012 10:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 04:01 AM, David Juran wrote:
Hello
I wonder if it's somehow possible to sync AD-users more selectively then
just by sub-tree. In my case, I'm dealing with a very large organisation
where the
On 02/10/2012 01:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 11:41 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2012 10:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 04:01 AM, David Juran wrote:
Hello
I wonder if it's somehow possible to sync AD-users more selectively
then
just by sub-tree. In my case, I'm
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:50 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Dmitri Pal d...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/30/2012 09:47 AM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi guys,
On 02/10/2012 12:18 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2012 01:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 11:41 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2012 10:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 04:01 AM, David Juran wrote:
Hello
I wonder if it's somehow possible to sync AD-users more
On 02/10/2012 02:22 PM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
I wget-ed the repo file on a 64bit fedora16 system but I'm failing in
seeing the package for 64-bit systems.
Please, could you tell me what my error is?
We just finished rebuilding the repo. Please try again.
We don't have a mechanism to lock the
On 02/10/2012 02:35 PM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
No, same as before.
Is it yum makecache sufficient to renew my metadata?
Sounds like it should work, I'm not in the habit of using makecache, I
tend to use the big hammer 'yum clean --all'
I just checked the repo the files are there, so I assume
On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
This may be related to https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/273 and
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/274 which have been fixed in
1.2.10
In this case Ian please open a bugzilla, it looks like we need to
address this in RHEL6.
I'll
Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 11:41 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/10/2012 10:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/10/2012 04:01 AM, David Juran wrote:
Hello
I wonder if it's somehow possible to sync AD-users more selectively
then
just by sub-tree. In my case, I'm dealing with a very large
Hi guys,
I see in the (Fedora 15) FreeIPA documentation that IBM AIX as a client is
supported for version 5.3.
What about versions 6.1 and 7.1? Are they really not supported or simply
not been verified they can work?
Thanks
Marco
___
Freeipa-users
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 16:18 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On 02/10/2012 03:49 PM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
*Error: Protected multilib versions: libldb-1.1.0-1.fc16.i686 !=
libldb-1.1.4-1.fc16.1.x86_64*
This error is because you've got both a 32-bit and 64-bit
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/10/2012 03:49 PM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
*Error: Protected multilib versions: libldb-1.1.0-1.fc16.i686 !=
libldb-1.1.4-1.fc16.1.x86_64*
This error is because you've got both a
On 02/10/2012 04:16 PM, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi guys,
I see in the (Fedora 15) FreeIPA documentation that IBM AIX as a
client is supported for version 5.3.
What about versions 6.1 and 7.1? Are they really not supported or
simply not been verified they can work?
You are definitely welcome to
On 02/07/2012 03:54 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
Users in group A can manage the membership of group B
Users in group A can manage this small set of attributes of members of
group B
Yes, I can see that delegating is going to be very hard to do securely /
properly.at least with [my] limited
26 matches
Mail list logo
